What are the connections between these independent physical objects and our mental representations of these objects? Is our sense-data an integral part of those independent objects? What does it mean...What are the connections between these independent physical objects and our mental representations of these objects? Is our sense-data an integral part of those independent objects? What does it mean when we say that our language and the facts partake of the same logical form?(展开)
What are the connections between these independent physical objects and our mental representations of these objects? Is our sense-data an integral part of those independent objects? What does it mean when we say that our language and the facts partake of th...
(展开)
AZ
0 有用 貂蛮公主 2024-01-08 01:35:45 广西
语言哲学的起点
0 有用 香迟 2024-05-09 17:06:09 广东
语言是游戏
0 有用 AZ 2022-06-17 12:59:42
What are the connections between these independent physical objects and our mental representations of these objects? Is our sense-data an integral part of those independent objects? What does it mean... What are the connections between these independent physical objects and our mental representations of these objects? Is our sense-data an integral part of those independent objects? What does it mean when we say that our language and the facts partake of the same logical form? (展开)
0 有用 sage.xiong 2020-03-25 23:49:12
没读懂，感觉应该先读罗素的。粗略看了一遍，以后再回头来看吧。
0 有用 Siri 2022-09-04 19:45:02 福建
在自己读的维特根斯坦相关内容里，只有这本提到了维氏的读写障碍症，而且还反复提，作者以此来解读维特根斯坦一些想法的来源。这本书读来一般，不知是翻译还是作者写作风格本如此，读的有些云里雾里的。上豆瓣才知道不是新书，是老书重印了。阅读体验一般，看完并没有加深对维特根斯坦哲学的关键概念的理解。类似的书我会更推荐蒙克为“如何阅读”系列写的维氏介绍，更像是写给普通人看的入门读物。