New Thinking about Propositions

Three leading philosophers of language present rival views on the nature of propositions

The starting-point for all future work on this topic

Philosophy (especially philosophy of language and philosophy of mind), science (especially linguistics and cognitive science), and common sense all sometimes make reference to propositions—understood as the things we believe and say, and ...

(展开全部)

Three leading philosophers of language present rival views on the nature of propositions

The starting-point for all future work on this topic

Philosophy (especially philosophy of language and philosophy of mind), science (especially linguistics and cognitive science), and common sense all sometimes make reference to propositions—understood as the things we believe and say, and the things which are (primarily) true or false. There is, however, no widespread agreement about what sorts of things these entities are. In New Thinking about Propositions, Jeffrey C. King, Scott Soames, and Jeff Speaks argue that commitment to propositions is indispensable, and that traditional accounts of propositions are inadequate. They each then defend their own views of the nature of propositions.

Readership: Scholars and advanced students in philosophy of language and philosophy of mind; linguists and cognitive scientists working in related fields.

Jeffrey C. King, Rutgers University, Scott Soames, University of Southern California, and Jeff Speaks, University of Notre Dame

Jeffrey C. King is Professor II and Chair of the Department of Philosophy at Rutgers University. He is the author of Complex Demonstratives: A Quantificational Account (MIT Press, 2001), and The Nature and Structure of Content (Clarendon Press, 2007).

...

(展开全部)

Jeffrey C. King, Rutgers University, Scott Soames, University of Southern California, and Jeff Speaks, University of Notre Dame

Jeffrey C. King is Professor II and Chair of the Department of Philosophy at Rutgers University. He is the author of Complex Demonstratives: A Quantificational Account (MIT Press, 2001), and The Nature and Structure of Content (Clarendon Press, 2007).

Scott Soames is Distinguished Professor and Director of the School of Philosophy at the University of Southern California. A Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, he taught for twenty-four years at Princeton University before moving to Southern California. He is the author of several books in the philosophy of language and the history of analytic philosophy.

Jeff Speaks is Rev. John A. O'Brien Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame. He is the author of several articles in the philosophy of language and the philosophy of mind.

Jeff Speaks: Introduction
Part I - Common ground
1: Jeffrey C. King: What role do propositions play in our theories?
2: Jeff Speaks: What's wrong with semantic theories which make no use of propositions?
3: Scott Soames: Why the traditional conceptions of propositions can't be correct
Part II - Three theories of propositions
· · · · · · (更多)

Jeff Speaks: Introduction
Part I - Common ground
1: Jeffrey C. King: What role do propositions play in our theories?
2: Jeff Speaks: What's wrong with semantic theories which make no use of propositions?
3: Scott Soames: Why the traditional conceptions of propositions can't be correct
Part II - Three theories of propositions
4: Jeffrey C. King: Naturalized propositions
5: Jeff Speaks: Propositions are properties of everything or nothing
6: Scott Soames: A cognitive theory of propositions
Part III - Critical essays
7: Jeffrey C. King: Criticism of Soames and Speaks
8: Jeff Speaks: Representational entities and representational acts
9: Scott Soames: Critique of two views: propositions as properties & propositions as facts
Part IV - Further thoughts
10: Jeffrey C. King: Reply to Speaks and Soames
11: Jeff Speaks: Representation and structure in the theory of propositions
12: Scott Soames: Clarifying and improving the cognitive theory to meet its explanatory burden
Bibliography
Index
· · · · · · (收起)