Three paradoxes surround the division of the costs of social reproduction: * Women have entered the paid labour force in growing numbers, but they continue to perform most of the unpaid labour of housework and childcare. * Birth rates have fallen but more and more mothers are supporting children on their own, with little or no assistance from fathers. * The growth of state spending is often blamed on malfunctioning markets, or runaway bureaucracies. But a large percentage of social spending provides substitutes for income transfers that once took place within families. Who Pays for the Kids? explains how this paradoxical situation has arisen. The costs of social reproduction are largely paid by women: men have remained extremely reluctant to pay their share of the costs of raising the next generation. Traditional theories - neo-classical, Marxist and Feminist - can only provide an incomplete account of this, and this book offers an alternative analysis, based on individual choices but within interlocking structures of constraint based on gender, age, sex, nation, race and class.
0 有用 三轮车 2022-08-12 18:15:28
补标,和马克思&新古典有很长的对话(真字面意义上的对话),强调家庭和市场&国家社会一样,都是contested terrain,不要假设它是一个行动主体,这点倒是非常的rrpe。虽然反对马和新,但是感觉受两者的影响依然很大,还是有点偏实证主义,跟现在流行的拉康福柯完全不是一个路数了。
0 有用 三轮车 2022-08-12 18:15:28
补标,和马克思&新古典有很长的对话(真字面意义上的对话),强调家庭和市场&国家社会一样,都是contested terrain,不要假设它是一个行动主体,这点倒是非常的rrpe。虽然反对马和新,但是感觉受两者的影响依然很大,还是有点偏实证主义,跟现在流行的拉康福柯完全不是一个路数了。