Indonesian and Nigerian politics paralleled each other to a remarkable degree before diverging suddenly when oil money came into play. Both were populous, ethnically diverse countries with abundant natural resources and histories of political turbulence and authoritarian rule. But despite these likenesses, the two countries have seen dramatic differences in economic performance over recent decades: Indonesia grew rapidly and was able to improve national standards of living, while Nigeria stagnated and experienced deepening poverty. Author Peter Lewis suggests that the explanation for this divergence is found in each country's way of confronting policy reform and developing institutions for economic growth. Based on the author's detailed study of forty years of economic change, Growing Apart offers conclusions about the policy decisions, governmental institutions, and political foundations needed for long-term economic growth.
"Growing Apart is an important and distinguished contribution to the literature on the political economy of development. Indonesia and Nigeria have long presented one of the most natural opportunities for comparative study. Peter Lewis, one of America's best scholars of Nigeria, has produced the definitive treatment of their divergent development paths. In the process, he tells us much theoretically about when, why, and how political institutions shape economic growth."
—Larry Diamond, Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution
"Growing Apart is a careful and sophisticated analysis of the political factors that have shaped the economic fortunes of Indonesia and Nigeria. Both scholars and policymakers will benefit from this book's valuable insights."
—Michael L. Ross, Associate Professor of Political Science, Chair of International Development Studies, UCLA
"Lewis presents an extraordinarily well-documented comparative case study of two countries with a great deal in common, and yet with remarkably different postcolonial histories. His approach is a welcome departure from currently fashionable attempts to explain development using large, multi-country databases packed with often dubious measures of various aspects of 'governance.'"
—Ross H. McLeod, Editor, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies
"This is a highly readable and important book. Peter Lewis provides us with both a compelling institutionalist analysis of economic development performance and a very insightful comparative account of the political economies of two highly complex developing countries, Nigeria and Indonesia. His well-informed account generates interesting findings by focusing on the ability of leaders in both countries to make credible commitments to the private sector and assemble pro-growth coalitions. This kind of cross-regional political economy is often advocated in the profession but actually quite rare because it is so hard to do well. Lewis's book will set the standard for a long time."
—Nicolas van de Walle, John S. Knight Professor of International Studies, Cornell University
0 有用 Alsasymphonie 2022-01-08 09:27:35
上学期老刘教质性方法论时零零散散讲了很多内容,方法在他自己的研究当中确实贯彻得很好,而且理论功夫非常扎实。第二章lit review需要好好读,比较历史社会学和制度分析两种理论传统的调和与对话也很有启发(虽然我基础还很薄弱…)本书的宏大问题是什么类型的制度安排对于穷国经济发展而言是重要的?促进增长和诱导机构发展的政治条件是什么?通过求异法对比资源禀赋、政治进程比较相似,但是在亚洲金融危机爆发前经济... 上学期老刘教质性方法论时零零散散讲了很多内容,方法在他自己的研究当中确实贯彻得很好,而且理论功夫非常扎实。第二章lit review需要好好读,比较历史社会学和制度分析两种理论传统的调和与对话也很有启发(虽然我基础还很薄弱…)本书的宏大问题是什么类型的制度安排对于穷国经济发展而言是重要的?促进增长和诱导机构发展的政治条件是什么?通过求异法对比资源禀赋、政治进程比较相似,但是在亚洲金融危机爆发前经济增长表现大相径庭的印尼和尼日利亚来说明几个核心的假定:制度的早期发展即可暂时实现大幅增长、寻租和腐败对于增长有不同影响、问责制缺乏下决策权下放和政策锁定可以增强可信度、发展型领导力出现需要政治经济机遇、精英协调以及包容性制度的重要性;两者在90s的共同崩溃则说明持续性制度安排对于长期增长必不可少。 (展开)
0 有用 Alsasymphonie 2022-01-08 09:27:35
上学期老刘教质性方法论时零零散散讲了很多内容,方法在他自己的研究当中确实贯彻得很好,而且理论功夫非常扎实。第二章lit review需要好好读,比较历史社会学和制度分析两种理论传统的调和与对话也很有启发(虽然我基础还很薄弱…)本书的宏大问题是什么类型的制度安排对于穷国经济发展而言是重要的?促进增长和诱导机构发展的政治条件是什么?通过求异法对比资源禀赋、政治进程比较相似,但是在亚洲金融危机爆发前经济... 上学期老刘教质性方法论时零零散散讲了很多内容,方法在他自己的研究当中确实贯彻得很好,而且理论功夫非常扎实。第二章lit review需要好好读,比较历史社会学和制度分析两种理论传统的调和与对话也很有启发(虽然我基础还很薄弱…)本书的宏大问题是什么类型的制度安排对于穷国经济发展而言是重要的?促进增长和诱导机构发展的政治条件是什么?通过求异法对比资源禀赋、政治进程比较相似,但是在亚洲金融危机爆发前经济增长表现大相径庭的印尼和尼日利亚来说明几个核心的假定:制度的早期发展即可暂时实现大幅增长、寻租和腐败对于增长有不同影响、问责制缺乏下决策权下放和政策锁定可以增强可信度、发展型领导力出现需要政治经济机遇、精英协调以及包容性制度的重要性;两者在90s的共同崩溃则说明持续性制度安排对于长期增长必不可少。 (展开)