作者:
Michael Bakunin 出版社: Cambridge University Press 副标题: Statism and Anarchy (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought) 出版年: 1990-11-30 页数: 300 定价: USD 33.99 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780521369732
Statism and Anarchy is a complete English translation of the last work by the great Russian anarchist Michael Bakunin, written in 1873. Then he assails the Marxist alternative, predicting that a 'dictatorship of the proletariat' will in fact be a dictatorship over the proletariat, and will produce a new class of socialist rulers. Instead, he outlines his vision of an anarchist ...
Statism and Anarchy is a complete English translation of the last work by the great Russian anarchist Michael Bakunin, written in 1873. Then he assails the Marxist alternative, predicting that a 'dictatorship of the proletariat' will in fact be a dictatorship over the proletariat, and will produce a new class of socialist rulers. Instead, he outlines his vision of an anarchist society and identifies the social forces he believes will achieve an anarchist revolution. Statism and Anarchy had an immediate influence on the 'to the people' movement of Russian populism, and Bakunin's ideas inspired significant anarchist movements in Spain, Italy, Russia and elsewhere. In a lucid introduction Marshall Shatz locates Bakunin in his immediate historical and intellectual context, and assesses the impact of his ideas on the wider development of European radical thought. A guide to further reading and chronology of events are also appended as aids to students encountering Bakunin's thought for the first time.
原文摘录
· · · · · ·
Let him govern, and he will become the most unbearable tyrant, for scholarly pride is repulsive, offensive, and more oppressive than any other. To be the slaves of pedants - what a fate for mankind! Give them free rein, and they will start performing the same experiments on human society that for the sake of science they now perform on rabbits, cats, and dogs.
We will esteem scholars according to their merits, but for the salvation of their intellect and morality they must not be given any social privileges or accorded any other right than the common one of freedom to propagate their convictions, ideas, and knowledge. Power should no more be given to them than to anyone else, for anyone who is invested with power by an invariable social law will inevitably become the oppressor and exp... (查看原文)
0 有用 末人 2015-09-20 00:45:30
太多歷史了，或者說全是歷史（時評）。作為馬老師的競爭者，眼光毒。
0 有用 旮旯 2018-03-09 09:24:45
對政府、國家的批判比他所設想的無政府主義狀態還要全面。巴枯寧認為國家、教會等體制都是（黑格爾主義式）形而上思考推導到極端的結果，都是服務於少數有管道接受教育的階級。而所有透過教育來加諸於人的觀念都是統治階級的陰謀。但無政府主義的思想如何不透過國家、教會、教育來散佈？對此巴枯寧似乎沒有提出令人信服的設想。在這一點上，克魯泡特金更願意承認觀念的重要，認為反叛的精神需要觀念作導引，行動則需要少數的勇者作... 對政府、國家的批判比他所設想的無政府主義狀態還要全面。巴枯寧認為國家、教會等體制都是（黑格爾主義式）形而上思考推導到極端的結果，都是服務於少數有管道接受教育的階級。而所有透過教育來加諸於人的觀念都是統治階級的陰謀。但無政府主義的思想如何不透過國家、教會、教育來散佈？對此巴枯寧似乎沒有提出令人信服的設想。在這一點上，克魯泡特金更願意承認觀念的重要，認為反叛的精神需要觀念作導引，行動則需要少數的勇者作領導。巴枯寧則反對任何形式的領導（包括無產階級專政），認為領導必定導向中央集權。 (展开)
0 有用 旮旯 2018-03-09 09:24:45
對政府、國家的批判比他所設想的無政府主義狀態還要全面。巴枯寧認為國家、教會等體制都是（黑格爾主義式）形而上思考推導到極端的結果，都是服務於少數有管道接受教育的階級。而所有透過教育來加諸於人的觀念都是統治階級的陰謀。但無政府主義的思想如何不透過國家、教會、教育來散佈？對此巴枯寧似乎沒有提出令人信服的設想。在這一點上，克魯泡特金更願意承認觀念的重要，認為反叛的精神需要觀念作導引，行動則需要少數的勇者作... 對政府、國家的批判比他所設想的無政府主義狀態還要全面。巴枯寧認為國家、教會等體制都是（黑格爾主義式）形而上思考推導到極端的結果，都是服務於少數有管道接受教育的階級。而所有透過教育來加諸於人的觀念都是統治階級的陰謀。但無政府主義的思想如何不透過國家、教會、教育來散佈？對此巴枯寧似乎沒有提出令人信服的設想。在這一點上，克魯泡特金更願意承認觀念的重要，認為反叛的精神需要觀念作導引，行動則需要少數的勇者作領導。巴枯寧則反對任何形式的領導（包括無產階級專政），認為領導必定導向中央集權。 (展开)
0 有用 末人 2015-09-20 00:45:30
太多歷史了，或者說全是歷史（時評）。作為馬老師的競爭者，眼光毒。