作者: ZINSSER,WILLIAM
出版社: Harpercollins
出版年: 2001-04-16
页数: 308
定价: $14.00
装帧: Pap
ISBN: 9780060006648
豆瓣成员常用的标签(共42个) · · · · · ·
喜欢读"On Writing Well"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·
按有用程度 按页码先后 最新笔记
-
第1页
sdt (生逢其时,不负今日!)
Then along came e-mail can all the formalities went away. E-mail has no etiquette. It does not require stationery, or neatness, or proper spelling, or preliminary chitchat. No amenities....Never have so many people written so profusely and with so few inhibitions. Which means that is was not a cognitive problem after all. It was a cultural problem, rooted in that old bugaboo of American education:... (更多)Then along came e-mail can all the formalities went away. E-mail has no etiquette. It does not require stationery, or neatness, or proper spelling, or preliminary chitchat. No amenities....Never have so many people written so profusely and with so few inhibitions. Which means that is was not a cognitive problem after all. It was a cultural problem, rooted in that old bugaboo of American education: fear.Fear of writing gets planted in American schoolchild at an early age, especially children of scientific or technical or mechanical bent. They are led to believe that writing is a special language owned by the English teacher, available only to the humanistic few who have " a gift for words". But writing isn't skill that some people are born with and others aren't, like a gift for art or music. Writing is talking to someone else on paper. Anybody who can think clearly can write clearly, about any subject at all.E-mail pushed that verbosity to a new extreme: chatter unlimited.It is a spontaneous medium, not conducive to slowing down or looking back.Chapter OneI was asked if I would come and talk about writing as a vocation......He was going to talk about writing as an avocation.He said it was tremendous fun. Coming home from an arduous day at the hospital, he would go straight to his yellow pad and write his tensions away. The words just flowed. (FLOW......WT..................) It was easy. I then said that writing was not easy and was not easy and was not fun. It was hard and lonely, and the words seldom just flowed. (......................."What do you do on days when it isn't going well?" He said he just stopped writing and put the work aside for a day when it would go better. I then said that the professional writer must establish a daily schedule and stick to it. I said that writing is a craft, not an art, and the men who runs away from his craft because he lacks inspiration is fooling himself. He is also going broke.On "Is it useful to circulated in the literary world"... I said that professional writers are solitary drudges who seldom see other writers.As for the students, anyone might think we left them bewildered. But in fact we gave them a broader glimpse of the writing process than if only one of us had talked. For there isn't any "right" way to do such personal work. There are all kinds of writers and all kinds of methods, and any method that helps you to say what you want to convey is the right method for you. Some people need silence, others turn on the radio. Some write by hand, some by word processor, some by talking into a tape recorder. Some people write their first draft in one long burst and then revise; others can't write the second paragraph until they have fiddle endlessly with the first.The self who emerges on paper is far stiffer than the person who sat down to write.Ultimately the product that any writer has to sell is not the subject being written about, but who he or she is.Good writing has an aliveness that keeps the reader reading from one paragraph to the next, and it is not a question of to personalize the author. It is a question of using the English language in a way that will achieve the greatest clarity and strength.Chapter TwoClutter is the disease of American writing. We are a society strangling in unnecessary words, circular constructions, pompous frills and meaning less jargon. (收起)2011-08-16 19:49:02 5回应
-
第4页
The Q (再也不看应试的书了!)
Professional writers rewrite their sentences over and over and then rewrite what they have rewritten. The professional writer must establish a daily schedule and stick to it. (更多)
(收起)Professional writers rewrite their sentences over and over and then rewrite what they have rewritten. The professional writer must establish a daily schedule and stick to it.
2011-02-08 20:43:00 回应
-
CharpterI Principle - Clutter
Clara佐罗 (settling down)
Clutter is the language of the Pentagon calling an invasion a "reinforced protective reaction strike" and justifying its vast budgets on the need for "counterforce deterrence." (更多)Clutter is the language of the Pentagon calling an invasion a "reinforced protective reaction strike" and justifying its vast budgets on the need for "counterforce deterrence." (收起)2011-11-24 10:44:48 回应
-
第1页
sdt (生逢其时,不负今日!)
Then along came e-mail can all the formalities went away. E-mail has no etiquette. It does not require stationery, or neatness, or proper spelling, or preliminary chitchat. No amenities....Never have so many people written so profusely and with so few inhibitions. Which means that is was not a cognitive problem after all. It was a cultural problem, rooted in that old bugaboo of American education:... (更多)Then along came e-mail can all the formalities went away. E-mail has no etiquette. It does not require stationery, or neatness, or proper spelling, or preliminary chitchat. No amenities....Never have so many people written so profusely and with so few inhibitions. Which means that is was not a cognitive problem after all. It was a cultural problem, rooted in that old bugaboo of American education: fear.Fear of writing gets planted in American schoolchild at an early age, especially children of scientific or technical or mechanical bent. They are led to believe that writing is a special language owned by the English teacher, available only to the humanistic few who have " a gift for words". But writing isn't skill that some people are born with and others aren't, like a gift for art or music. Writing is talking to someone else on paper. Anybody who can think clearly can write clearly, about any subject at all.E-mail pushed that verbosity to a new extreme: chatter unlimited.It is a spontaneous medium, not conducive to slowing down or looking back.Chapter OneI was asked if I would come and talk about writing as a vocation......He was going to talk about writing as an avocation.He said it was tremendous fun. Coming home from an arduous day at the hospital, he would go straight to his yellow pad and write his tensions away. The words just flowed. (FLOW......WT..................) It was easy. I then said that writing was not easy and was not easy and was not fun. It was hard and lonely, and the words seldom just flowed. (......................."What do you do on days when it isn't going well?" He said he just stopped writing and put the work aside for a day when it would go better. I then said that the professional writer must establish a daily schedule and stick to it. I said that writing is a craft, not an art, and the men who runs away from his craft because he lacks inspiration is fooling himself. He is also going broke.On "Is it useful to circulated in the literary world"... I said that professional writers are solitary drudges who seldom see other writers.As for the students, anyone might think we left them bewildered. But in fact we gave them a broader glimpse of the writing process than if only one of us had talked. For there isn't any "right" way to do such personal work. There are all kinds of writers and all kinds of methods, and any method that helps you to say what you want to convey is the right method for you. Some people need silence, others turn on the radio. Some write by hand, some by word processor, some by talking into a tape recorder. Some people write their first draft in one long burst and then revise; others can't write the second paragraph until they have fiddle endlessly with the first.The self who emerges on paper is far stiffer than the person who sat down to write.Ultimately the product that any writer has to sell is not the subject being written about, but who he or she is.Good writing has an aliveness that keeps the reader reading from one paragraph to the next, and it is not a question of to personalize the author. It is a question of using the English language in a way that will achieve the greatest clarity and strength.Chapter TwoClutter is the disease of American writing. We are a society strangling in unnecessary words, circular constructions, pompous frills and meaning less jargon. (收起)2011-08-16 19:49:02 5回应
-
第4页
The Q (再也不看应试的书了!)
Professional writers rewrite their sentences over and over and then rewrite what they have rewritten. The professional writer must establish a daily schedule and stick to it. (更多)
(收起)Professional writers rewrite their sentences over and over and then rewrite what they have rewritten. The professional writer must establish a daily schedule and stick to it.
2011-02-08 20:43:00 回应
-
第12页
sdt (生逢其时,不负今日!)
Our national tendency is to inflate and thereby sound important, the Writer gave a example of a pilot who describing the prediction of coming rain as “he is presently anticipating experiencing considerable precipitation”. The secret of good writing is to strip every sentence to its cleanest components. (I love the verb “strip” he used. The Writer gave some examples and stated that “thes... (更多)Our national tendency is to inflate and thereby sound important, the Writer gave a example of a pilot who describing the prediction of coming rain as “he is presently anticipating experiencing considerable precipitation”.The secret of good writing is to strip every sentence to its cleanest components. (I love the verb “strip” he used.The Writer gave some examples and stated that “these are the thousand and one adulterants that weaken the strength of a sentence”, quite confused with the express re “the thousand and one”, was he quoting the One Thousand and One Nights?Clear thinking becomes clear writing. It is impossible for a muddy thinker to write good English. He seems a big fans of Thoreau and quoted much from the Walden. How can the rest of us achieve such enviable freedom from clutter?Thanks to the Writer, I got the difference between “sanguine” and “sanguinary”, a bloody big one.“Faced with such obstacles, readers are at first tenacious. They blames themselves-they obviously missed something and they go back over to the mystifying sentence, or over the whole paragraph, piecing it out like an ancient rune, making guesses and moving on. But they won’t do that for long” Exactly!!! stop blaming ourselves the next time, the problem is not our poor understanding but the book we choose.Professional writers are constantly bearded by people who say they’d like to “try a little writing sometime” - meaning when they retired from their real profession, like insurance or real estate, which is hard. (LOL (收起)2011-08-26 23:10:59 回应
-
CharpterI Principle - Clutter
Clara佐罗 (settling down)
Clutter is the language of the Pentagon calling an invasion a "reinforced protective reaction strike" and justifying its vast budgets on the need for "counterforce deterrence." (更多)Clutter is the language of the Pentagon calling an invasion a "reinforced protective reaction strike" and justifying its vast budgets on the need for "counterforce deterrence." (收起)2011-11-24 10:44:48 回应
-
第12页
sdt (生逢其时,不负今日!)
Our national tendency is to inflate and thereby sound important, the Writer gave a example of a pilot who describing the prediction of coming rain as “he is presently anticipating experiencing considerable precipitation”. The secret of good writing is to strip every sentence to its cleanest components. (I love the verb “strip” he used. The Writer gave some examples and stated that “thes... (更多)Our national tendency is to inflate and thereby sound important, the Writer gave a example of a pilot who describing the prediction of coming rain as “he is presently anticipating experiencing considerable precipitation”.The secret of good writing is to strip every sentence to its cleanest components. (I love the verb “strip” he used.The Writer gave some examples and stated that “these are the thousand and one adulterants that weaken the strength of a sentence”, quite confused with the express re “the thousand and one”, was he quoting the One Thousand and One Nights?Clear thinking becomes clear writing. It is impossible for a muddy thinker to write good English. He seems a big fans of Thoreau and quoted much from the Walden. How can the rest of us achieve such enviable freedom from clutter?Thanks to the Writer, I got the difference between “sanguine” and “sanguinary”, a bloody big one.“Faced with such obstacles, readers are at first tenacious. They blames themselves-they obviously missed something and they go back over to the mystifying sentence, or over the whole paragraph, piecing it out like an ancient rune, making guesses and moving on. But they won’t do that for long” Exactly!!! stop blaming ourselves the next time, the problem is not our poor understanding but the book we choose.Professional writers are constantly bearded by people who say they’d like to “try a little writing sometime” - meaning when they retired from their real profession, like insurance or real estate, which is hard. (LOL (收起)2011-08-26 23:10:59 回应
-
第1页
sdt (生逢其时,不负今日!)
Then along came e-mail can all the formalities went away. E-mail has no etiquette. It does not require stationery, or neatness, or proper spelling, or preliminary chitchat. No amenities....Never have so many people written so profusely and with so few inhibitions. Which means that is was not a cognitive problem after all. It was a cultural problem, rooted in that old bugaboo of American education:... (更多)Then along came e-mail can all the formalities went away. E-mail has no etiquette. It does not require stationery, or neatness, or proper spelling, or preliminary chitchat. No amenities....Never have so many people written so profusely and with so few inhibitions. Which means that is was not a cognitive problem after all. It was a cultural problem, rooted in that old bugaboo of American education: fear.Fear of writing gets planted in American schoolchild at an early age, especially children of scientific or technical or mechanical bent. They are led to believe that writing is a special language owned by the English teacher, available only to the humanistic few who have " a gift for words". But writing isn't skill that some people are born with and others aren't, like a gift for art or music. Writing is talking to someone else on paper. Anybody who can think clearly can write clearly, about any subject at all.E-mail pushed that verbosity to a new extreme: chatter unlimited.It is a spontaneous medium, not conducive to slowing down or looking back.Chapter OneI was asked if I would come and talk about writing as a vocation......He was going to talk about writing as an avocation.He said it was tremendous fun. Coming home from an arduous day at the hospital, he would go straight to his yellow pad and write his tensions away. The words just flowed. (FLOW......WT..................) It was easy. I then said that writing was not easy and was not easy and was not fun. It was hard and lonely, and the words seldom just flowed. (......................."What do you do on days when it isn't going well?" He said he just stopped writing and put the work aside for a day when it would go better. I then said that the professional writer must establish a daily schedule and stick to it. I said that writing is a craft, not an art, and the men who runs away from his craft because he lacks inspiration is fooling himself. He is also going broke.On "Is it useful to circulated in the literary world"... I said that professional writers are solitary drudges who seldom see other writers.As for the students, anyone might think we left them bewildered. But in fact we gave them a broader glimpse of the writing process than if only one of us had talked. For there isn't any "right" way to do such personal work. There are all kinds of writers and all kinds of methods, and any method that helps you to say what you want to convey is the right method for you. Some people need silence, others turn on the radio. Some write by hand, some by word processor, some by talking into a tape recorder. Some people write their first draft in one long burst and then revise; others can't write the second paragraph until they have fiddle endlessly with the first.The self who emerges on paper is far stiffer than the person who sat down to write.Ultimately the product that any writer has to sell is not the subject being written about, but who he or she is.Good writing has an aliveness that keeps the reader reading from one paragraph to the next, and it is not a question of to personalize the author. It is a question of using the English language in a way that will achieve the greatest clarity and strength.Chapter TwoClutter is the disease of American writing. We are a society strangling in unnecessary words, circular constructions, pompous frills and meaning less jargon. (收起)2011-08-16 19:49:02 5回应
书评 · · · · · · 我来评论这本书
热门评论 最新评论
怎样写出靠谱的英文?— 英文写作圣经On Writing We...
-
- 门特 纽约时报评价On Writing Well是一本指导英文写作的圣经,任何想让要自己文章简洁的人都应该没事拿出来读一读,膜拜膜拜。 Library Journal说,在这本书里,你可以看到“A love and respect for the language is evident on every page.” ...... (1回应)2011-01-07 24/24有用来自 Harper Paperbacks2006版
如果你想学style,好好读这本书吧
-
- Daydreaming 毫不夸张的说,此书是我迄今为止,读过最满意的一本写作书。整本书自成体系,无时无刻不在展示作者的写作风格和写作思想。 如果你是一位刚入门的新手,或者期待一本书可以手把手教你一个写作套路,那么本书不适合你,比这本书更易读的厚书数不胜数,读本书一是对自己的摧残,二是很难会有比较显著的提高,属于做事倍功半的事情。 ......2009-02-09 7/7有用来自 Harper Paperbacks2006版
关于科技英语写作的部分有点问题
-
- 在竹林中(情之所钟,正在我辈) 这部分针对的不是科技英语写作,而是科普英语写作。科技英语写作的特殊格式和要求完全没提,介绍的只是怎么深入浅出的讲明白一个科学原理或者实验。引用的例文也多是Newyork这种普通杂志上的科普文章。也和作者的writer身份有关吧,毕竟不是做research的,可能他认为的科技英语写作就是这种杂志副刊或者科普读物吧......2011-03-14 2/2有用
第一个在"On Writing Well"的论坛里发言
- Harper Paperbacks版 亚马逊 RMB 105.00
- 加入购书单 多本比价 批量购买 已在购书单
这本书的其他版本有售 · · · · · ·
- > 点这儿转让 有223人想读,手里有一本闲着?
这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部3 )
- Harper Paperbacks版 2006-05-01 / 61人读过 / 有售
- HarperCollins Publishers, New York City, NY版 2008 / 32人读过
以下豆列推荐 · · · · · · (全部)
- 有效的学习:阅读,研究,写作 (Warald)
- IPS Class of 2010 - 2011 Fall Semester Book List (旱季小骆驼)
- 电子书柜 (珞迦远)
- 研究 (cheervivian)
- 未命名 (Viya)
谁读这本书?
喜欢这本书的人常去的小组 · · · · · ·

- 英语e书房 (220)

- 非线性Nonlinear (507)

- 牛津通识读本VSI (1929)

- Truman Capote (440)

- 公民社会猪肠粉 (606)

- 2012年我们一起去美国 (2266)

- Wolfram Mathematica (1324)

- 艾晓明 (750)
喜欢这本书的人关注的活动 · · · · · ·
订阅关于On Writing Well的评论:
feed: rss 2.0











