出版社: University Of Chicago Press
出版年: 1996-12-15
页数: 212
定价: USD 13.00
装帧: Paperback
ISBN: 9780226458083
内容简介 · · · · · ·
Since the publication of this book in 1962, Kuhn's writings (and many of his ideas, such as "paradigm shift") have been highly influential in academic and popular discourse. This book is must-reading for anyone studying the history and philosophy of science specifically, or cultural or technological change generally.
Since Kuhn does not permit truth to be a criterion of scienti...
Since the publication of this book in 1962, Kuhn's writings (and many of his ideas, such as "paradigm shift") have been highly influential in academic and popular discourse. This book is must-reading for anyone studying the history and philosophy of science specifically, or cultural or technological change generally.
Since Kuhn does not permit truth to be a criterion of scientific theories, he would presumably not claim his own theory to be true. But if causing a revolution is the hallmark of a superior paradigm, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions has been a resounding success.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions的创作者
· · · · · ·
-
托马斯·库恩 作者
作者简介 · · · · · ·
Thomas Samuel Kuhn (surname pronounced /ˈkuːn/; July 18, 1922 – June 17, 1996) was an American physicist who wrote extensively on the history of science and developed several important notions in the sociology and philosophy of science.
喜欢读"The Structure of Scientific Revolutions"的人也喜欢的电子书 · · · · · ·
喜欢读"The Structure of Scientific Revolutions"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 163 条 )
科学革命之路上的八卦
被现代科学证伪的理论真的应该被鄙视吗? ——谈库恩《科学革命的结构》
这篇书评可能有关键情节透露
中学时,政治老师谈到牛顿,曾痛心疾首地说“牛顿是一位多么伟大的物理学家,可是他晚年时用了几十年的时候去证明‘上帝是第一推动力’,并写了几百页的废纸。如果他能把这些时间拿去研究别的东西,那对科学是多么有意义的一件事啊。” 无论从唯物主义,还是以当代科学的眼光... (展开)【转】伊安·哈金:《科学革命的结构》50周年纪念
无责任简介:托马斯•库恩《科学革命的结构》
论坛 · · · · · ·
在这本书的论坛里发言这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部13 )
-
北京大学出版社 (2012)9.0分 3471人读过
-
北京大学出版社 (2004)8.8分 1622人读过
-
北京大学出版社 (2022)9.1分 512人读过
-
University Of Chicago Press (2012)8.9分 132人读过
以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )
- 哲学宅男理想书架 (hkstehtstark)
- 【MIT】麻省理工--脑与认知科学--阅读书目 (Shawn™)
- Glen Weyl的价格理论书单(威力加强版) (Yii)
- The 100 Best Non-Fiction Books of the Century (ZG)
- 1000+ 豆瓣9.0+的書 (Python)
谁读这本书? · · · · · ·
二手市场
· · · · · ·
订阅关于The Structure of Scientific Revolutions的评论:
feed: rss 2.0
2 有用 Zen Mule 2012-08-11 23:24:03
An argument of what science is nothing but a kind of faith.
1 有用 Welfare 2013-10-12 05:37:30
Ask your research if it "again gives me hope and joy in life...I believe it is again possible to march forward."pp84; Recognize sth.has gone fundamentally wrong, and your training has equipped you to ... Ask your research if it "again gives me hope and joy in life...I believe it is again possible to march forward."pp84; Recognize sth.has gone fundamentally wrong, and your training has equipped you to deal with it;Able and beautiful to solve problems that alternative old paradigms failed;Explain phenomena previously unknown/link lower level theories (展开)
0 有用 allday2k 2010-05-01 23:19:12
"Normal science consists in the actualization of that promise, an actualization achieved by extending the knowledge of those facts that the paradigm displays as particularly revealing, by increasing t... "Normal science consists in the actualization of that promise, an actualization achieved by extending the knowledge of those facts that the paradigm displays as particularly revealing, by increasing the extent of the match between those facts and the paradigm's predictions, and by further articulation of the paradigm itself." (展开)
0 有用 Len 2013-08-26 00:49:59
生词不多,阅读完全无障碍
0 有用 ae 2012-12-29 15:39:14
读的睡不着觉,或者是因为想那些问题睡不着才读的
0 有用 mipropiocentro 2024-03-09 14:20:50 加拿大
[excerpts] … Francis Bacon’s acute methodological dictum: “Truth emerges more readily from error than from confusion.” … Nor is it just the problems that have changed. Rather the whole network of fac... [excerpts] … Francis Bacon’s acute methodological dictum: “Truth emerges more readily from error than from confusion.” … Nor is it just the problems that have changed. Rather the whole network of fact and theory that the textbook paradigm fits to nature has shifted. (展开)
0 有用 SoccerObsidian 2023-11-13 17:44:05 北京
其实很久以前为了学福柯两个中译本都读过了,这次读了英文版嗯嗯,,,对本文科生而言情感上当然是觉得做科学史非常牛逼,属于我等废人望尘莫及的领域。比起关注老生常谈的范式问题,其实最后几章有提到的、对于共同体和科学话语权威的反思倒是更吸引我,可能因为我时常会站在社会学的立场上,所以对此更有共鸣吧只能说。1969后记请看。
0 有用 森木三 2023-08-16 04:17:46 加拿大
must
0 有用 iki 2023-02-13 06:08:57 美国
读前有这是一本“震惊!改变人一生”的必读书目的印象,但没想到这么moderate…难道是我已经不幸被太多critical theory对科学的批评入脑了吗
0 有用 今泉佑唯 2022-05-22 05:29:59
the origin of paradigmatic tradition