作者: Yasheng Huang
出版社: Cambridge University Press
出版年: 2008-9-1
页数: 366
定价: USD 38.00
装帧: Hardcover
ISBN: 9780521898102
内容简介 · · · · · ·
作者简介 · · · · · ·
"Yasheng Huang is an insightful scholar of China's ... (展开全部) "The development of the Chinese private sector is a key to the future shape and performance of the Chinese economy. At present, the subject is widely misunderstood. This book does more than any other to clarify the issues and point the way forward." - Christopher Howe, FBA, School of East Asian Studies, University of Sheffield
"Yasheng Huang is an insightful scholar of China's political economy. In this important book, he shows how China's rural economy took off in the 1980s, led by 'township and village enterprises' that were essentially private, only to be ignored in the 1990s by state-led development that focused on urban regions such as Shanghai. The 'Shanghai miracle,' he argues - and as any businessman who has worked there knows - was not the simple triumph of capitalism, but of a stronger and more intrusive (and effective) state. If one wants to understand the policy origins of China's growing divide between rich and poor, urban and rural, one need look no further than this book." - William Kirby, Harvard University
"Sure to generate a lively debate, Professor Huang's study provides a provocative and well-researched challenge to much current thinking on China's economic development. The widely shared gains of the 1980s have not been matched in more recent years. Danger signs include the stagnation in household incomes, growing inequality and illiteracy, and heightened governance problems. Huang argues that China will not be able to continue to grow unless the benefits of growth are widely shared through fundamental political and legal reforms." - Susan Rose-Ackerman, Yale Law School
"Most books about China's economy and their authors fall into one of two camps: those that are hypercritical and those that are hyperlaudatory. Professor Huang's book is closer to the former than the latter, for example, he characterizes China's economy as '...crony capitalism built on systemic corruption and raw political power.' Yet, his book is different from, as well as better than, others in that genre because it gives ample recognition to contrary views and empirical data supporting them. Consequently, Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics is both immensely informative and enormously provocative." - Charles Wolf, Jr., Pardee RAND Graduate School
"For years, Western economists are amazed that China's growth is obviously fueled by factor accumulation and yet her capital markets appear to be under developed. Yasheng Huang's book provides some refreshing information and analysis. He shows that in China's vast rural areas, which Western academics often cannot obtain good and detailed information, economic and financial liberalization went much further than credited by outside analysts and that the rigorous development of private entrepreneurship explained much of China's takeoff. His thesis is worthy of attention; this book will enhance our understanding of China's economy and lead us to take a more thorough look at the development process." - Bernard Yeung, University of Singapore Business School
目录 · · · · · ·
2. The entrepreneurial decade
3. A great reversal
4. What is wrong with Shanghai?
5. Capitalism with Chinese characteristics.
2. The entrepreneurial decade
3. A great reversal
4. What is wrong with Shanghai?
5. Capitalism with Chinese characteristics.
· · · · · · (收起)
豆瓣成员常用的标签(共131个) · · · · · ·
喜欢读"Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·
按有用程度 按页码先后 最新笔记
-
第147页
......in the 1980s, the RCCs were moving explicitly in the direction of autonomy and self-governance, whereas in the 1990s, the RCCs moved in the opposite direction, both in letter and in spirit......In both the 1980s and 1990s, informal finance played an active role in meeting the financial needs of rural entrepreneurs and households. The difference, however, is that informal finance was not only... (更多)
(收起)......in the 1980s, the RCCs were moving explicitly in the direction of autonomy and self-governance, whereas in the 1990s, the RCCs moved in the opposite direction, both in letter and in spirit......In both the 1980s and 1990s, informal finance played an active role in meeting the financial needs of rural entrepreneurs and households. The difference, however, is that informal finance was not only tolerated in the 1980s but also was actually used by the reformers to benchmark the reforms of the formal financial institutions. In the 1990s, there was a protracted, costly, and ultimately futile effort to stamp out informal finance on the one hand and to intervene and micromanage the operations of the formal financial institutions on the other.
2012-02-15 15:02:14 回应
-
第144页
The easing of the financing for rural private entrepreneurs did not occur by chance; it occurred because financial policy was tacitly or even explicitly supportive of the private sector. This is one of the least known aspects of the 1980s. Between 1980 and 1988, the Chinese financial system became increasingly flexible as the reformers directed banks and RCCs to lend to the emerging private sector... (更多)
(收起)The easing of the financing for rural private entrepreneurs did not occur by chance; it occurred because financial policy was tacitly or even explicitly supportive of the private sector. This is one of the least known aspects of the 1980s. Between 1980 and 1988, the Chinese financial system became increasingly flexible as the reformers directed banks and RCCs to lend to the emerging private sector. They also introduced proactive reforms of financial institutions by reducing state controls RCCs and permitting entry by private players.
2012-02-15 14:42:39 回应
-
第139页
In the 1990s numerous rural entrepreneurs who had been forced to tap into or organize underground financing because of massive inadequacies of China's banking system were arrested......This practice, widespread in the 1980s and a legitimate source of start-up capital for many TVEs, now ran into the iron fist of the Chinese financial regulators determined to stamp out all forms of informal finance. (更多)
(收起)In the 1990s numerous rural entrepreneurs who had been forced to tap into or organize underground financing because of massive inadequacies of China's banking system were arrested......This practice, widespread in the 1980s and a legitimate source of start-up capital for many TVEs, now ran into the iron fist of the Chinese financial regulators determined to stamp out all forms of informal finance.
2012-02-15 14:19:11 回应
-
第1页
袁本初 (悲伤时读书)
Lenovo is a success story of the market-based finance of Hong Kong, not of China’s state-controlled financial system. Until 2005, many of the high-tech and so-called strategic industries were declared off-limits to domestic pri- vate entry. Indigenous private entrepreneurs, many highly capable, could grow their businesses only via foreign registration. Professor Sull chronicles seven ot... (更多)Lenovo is a success story of the market-based finance of Hong Kong, not of China’s state-controlled financial system.Until 2005, many of the high-tech and so-called strategic industries were declared off-limits to domestic pri- vate entry. Indigenous private entrepreneurs, many highly capable, could grow their businesses only via foreign registration.Professor Sull chronicles seven other firms in his book: Sina, UTStar- com, AsiaInfo, Haier, Galanz, Wahaha, and Ting Hsin. Every single case Professor Sull discusses is a Lenovo-like story. The firms are all registered as foreign firms in China, or some of their main operations are so registered.They are Chinese to the extent that theirmanagers and owners are ethnically Chinese, but their legal status is foreign. That corporate success in China requires a combination of Chinese management and foreign legalstatus is probably the cleanest illustration of the massive distortions in China’s business environment – that this is a system that has imposed a straitjacket on the domestic private sector. China lacks efficient legal and financial institutionsChina’s success has less to do with creating efficient institutions and more to do with permitting access to efficient institutions outside of ChinaIn the 1980s, the country was moving directionally toward the virtuous kind of capitalism, or what Baumol, Litan, and Shramm (2007) describe as entrepreneurial capitalism. In the 1990s, the country stillmoved toward capitalism but of a different and less virtuous kind – the state-led brand of capitalism.Themost impressive poverty reduction in China occurred at a time when China had no FDI – in the early 1980s – and, in fact, after China became a member of the WorldTrade Organization (WTO) in 2001, the emerging evidence is that China’s poverty level increased. During the entrepreneurial decade of the 1980s, fast GDP growth was accompanied by equally fast household income growth. During the state-led 1990s, fast GDP growth diverged from house- hold income growth. Suffice it to mention that the pre-Tiananmen and the post-Tiananmen leaderships differed in none critical aspect – their rural vis-` a-vis urban credentials. Before Tianan-men, many of the top Chinese leaders charged with day-to-day economic management – Zhao Ziyang, Wan Li, and Tian Jiyun – hailed from rural provinces that had pioneered in agricultural reforms. They built their eco-nomic credentials by having succeeded in the management of agriculture. After Tiananmen, the top Chinese leaders in charge of the economy – JiangZemin and Zhu Rongji – came from the most urban and the least reformed region of China – Shanghai.“If China spent precious resources on such projects, what other projects had to be given up to finance these projects?” I return to this issue in greater detail in the next chapter, but suffice it to say here that some of the rural reforms in the 1980s were quite far-reaching and that in the 1990s there was a reversal of some of the key elements of the reforms that had allowed for a flourishing of rural entrepreneurship in the 1980s.in the first 10 years of reforms, this number already declined to 96 million in 1988. The poverty headcount declined by 154 million. In the next 10 years of reforms from 1989 to 1999, the poverty headcount declined by only 62 million. This was a fraction of what China achieved in the 1980s. the structural explanation oddly assumes that it was easier to tackle poverty in the 1980s than in the 1990s. In the 1990s, theChinese government commanded substantially more resources than in the 1980s.none comes close to producing themicroeconomic success stories that have come out of some of the initially poorer agricultural provinces. The reason is that the economic policies in rural China were farmore liberal than thosein urban China.In the 1980s, as SEBS1991 shows, it was the rural entrepreneurs who came to the cities and established operations there. In the 1990s, it was mainly the rural laborers who flooded the cities in search of jobs. Fittingly , 1989 marked both the decadal and policy turning pointsMy conjecture, althought not yet an empirically settled view , is that the economic effect of Tiananmen were actually far more long-lasting than we previously believed .One observable effect of Tiananmen is that the backgrounds and outlooks of chinese leaders before and after Tiananmen-symbolized by Zhao Ziyang in particular-had first gained national prominence as a result of their economic stewardship of the poor tural provinces . More than any other politician ,Zhao Ziyang and Wan Li had lauched China's transformative rural reforms , in Sichuan and Anhui provinces .While farming became increasingly less lucrative , rural Chinese flocked to labor markets to contribute their labor rather than to start their own businessThe TVEs were the most dynamic economic force in the 1980s and provided a ready channel for the rural chinese to transition out of the low value-added agriculture. Their failings in the 1990s had a huge effect on the economic well-being of the rural population . The fate of the TVEs is also a barometer of the policy environment (收起)2011-09-25 20:28:50 回应
-
第2页
Much of the received wisdom in the academic literature states that entrepreneurship, financial liberalization, and private property rights security are not significant components of Chinese economic growth. The success of the Chinese economy has inspired the idea that economic growth follows from an adept tailoring of economic policies and institutions to their local contexts rather than from an a... (更多)
(收起)Much of the received wisdom in the academic literature states that entrepreneurship, financial liberalization, and private property rights security are not significant components of Chinese economic growth. The success of the Chinese economy has inspired the idea that economic growth follows from an adept tailoring of economic policies and institutions to their local contexts rather than from an application of universal economic principles.
2012-02-10 12:55:10 回应
-
第3页
楚材斯胜 (有用的书劳心,斯言是也)
If we believe Lenovo to be a product of China's business environment, then many of those who argue that China has created a unique, country-specific formula for cautious deregulation, state ownership, and selective government intervention in the economy have a point. If we believe Lenovo to be a product of Hong Kong and Hong Kong institutions, the success of Lenoveo then becomes a story of rule of... (更多)
(收起)If we believe Lenovo to be a product of China's business environment, then many of those who argue that China has created a unique, country-specific formula for cautious deregulation, state ownership, and selective government intervention in the economy have a point. If we believe Lenovo to be a product of Hong Kong and Hong Kong institutions, the success of Lenoveo then becomes a story of rule of law and market-base finance.
2012-01-19 04:53:42 回应
-
第147页
......in the 1980s, the RCCs were moving explicitly in the direction of autonomy and self-governance, whereas in the 1990s, the RCCs moved in the opposite direction, both in letter and in spirit......In both the 1980s and 1990s, informal finance played an active role in meeting the financial needs of rural entrepreneurs and households. The difference, however, is that informal finance was not only... (更多)
(收起)......in the 1980s, the RCCs were moving explicitly in the direction of autonomy and self-governance, whereas in the 1990s, the RCCs moved in the opposite direction, both in letter and in spirit......In both the 1980s and 1990s, informal finance played an active role in meeting the financial needs of rural entrepreneurs and households. The difference, however, is that informal finance was not only tolerated in the 1980s but also was actually used by the reformers to benchmark the reforms of the formal financial institutions. In the 1990s, there was a protracted, costly, and ultimately futile effort to stamp out informal finance on the one hand and to intervene and micromanage the operations of the formal financial institutions on the other.
2012-02-15 15:02:14 回应
-
第144页
The easing of the financing for rural private entrepreneurs did not occur by chance; it occurred because financial policy was tacitly or even explicitly supportive of the private sector. This is one of the least known aspects of the 1980s. Between 1980 and 1988, the Chinese financial system became increasingly flexible as the reformers directed banks and RCCs to lend to the emerging private sector... (更多)
(收起)The easing of the financing for rural private entrepreneurs did not occur by chance; it occurred because financial policy was tacitly or even explicitly supportive of the private sector. This is one of the least known aspects of the 1980s. Between 1980 and 1988, the Chinese financial system became increasingly flexible as the reformers directed banks and RCCs to lend to the emerging private sector. They also introduced proactive reforms of financial institutions by reducing state controls RCCs and permitting entry by private players.
2012-02-15 14:42:39 回应
-
第139页
In the 1990s numerous rural entrepreneurs who had been forced to tap into or organize underground financing because of massive inadequacies of China's banking system were arrested......This practice, widespread in the 1980s and a legitimate source of start-up capital for many TVEs, now ran into the iron fist of the Chinese financial regulators determined to stamp out all forms of informal finance. (更多)
(收起)In the 1990s numerous rural entrepreneurs who had been forced to tap into or organize underground financing because of massive inadequacies of China's banking system were arrested......This practice, widespread in the 1980s and a legitimate source of start-up capital for many TVEs, now ran into the iron fist of the Chinese financial regulators determined to stamp out all forms of informal finance.
2012-02-15 14:19:11 回应
书评 · · · · · · (共11条) 我来评论这本书
热门评论 最新评论
黄亚生:寻找真正的中国模式
-
- Ewan(El seny i la rauxa) “中国模式”如果存在的话,那就是温州模式 1981年,国门初开。 着名记者、报告文学家黄钢把儿子黄亚生送去了世界上最好的大学——哈佛大学。在这位坚定的共产党人看来,只有让叛逆的儿子见识到资本主义的腐朽和堕落,他才能重新相信共产主义。 黄钢是电影《永不消逝的电波》的剧本作者。电影里的主人公身处繁华的上海,却始终坚持...... (19回应)2009-04-15 60/61有用
《新左派评论》里对黄的批评
-
- 弱水三千(不为思考所阻挠) 首先声明,我并没有读这本书,虽然此书已经在书架上放了有些时候了。之所以这时候拿出来讨论,是因为读了在最新的一期《新左派评论》上Joel Andreas(安舟)写的对此书的长篇批评,颇为受益也深表赞同。 安舟对黄书中的观点总结如下:首先,中国近三十年的改革历程可分为两大段,80年代的发展是由农村企业的兴起所主导,而...... (10回应)2010-10-27 28/44有用
<有中国特色的资本主义>的中文翻译版
-
- io 各位朋友: 你们好! 我在2010年初在水木社区上了解到这本书,还比较感兴趣,看到网上有人问有没有中文版,正好有时间,于是就尝试将书翻译过来。经过半年的时间,翻译了大概2章,但经过详细审核的只有第1章(到英文版的p49),还有表格没有翻译过来,文档中标记为红色的地方,为我不确定翻译的地方,...... (11回应)2010-08-16 12/13有用
On Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics
-
- dldldl(过了开花的时光) Not bad. His main argument is pretty insightful, but a linear narrative of the historical development of China's economic reform is a little bit problematic for......2011-02-20 1/1有用
Arrighi,黄亚生,Andreas
-
- beep(大同民间故事) http://beeplin.blog.163.com/blog/static/1725441602011351123964/ 本篇核心说黄亚生的《中国特色资本主义》,并和Arrighi、Andreas对比。 《中国特色资本主义》讲了两层意思,一层是对事实的观察,一层是对此观察的解读。 第一层:中国的......2011-04-14 2/3有用
别的不说,先把它的得出来的观点抄在这里
-
- 邵立的学习园地(死读书,读死书,读书死) 有的结论很有新意。基本说明80年代在进步,90年代看起来在进步,但很多指数都在后退。最让我吃惊的是文盲率…… Synopsis p xiv 1980s Explicitly private entrepreneurship in the non-farm sectors developed vi...... (1回应)2011-01-20
温家宝视察阿里巴巴公司总部,马云的观点
-
- 搞小能(哇咔咔) 黄亚生在书中一直强调的观点是,中国经济的动力在上世纪80年代是源自农村地区的创业精神和意志,当90年代政策“突变”后,经济发展模式更多地仰仗SOE和FDI这两种形式,他坚持认为,民营企业对于这个民族独一无二的重要性。 其实就在最近这个时候,很适合对黄亚生做一个采访,刚刚宣布了取消出口退税,而且最重要的是,那些无论如何......2010-07-08
"Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics"的论坛 · · · · · ·
| Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics | 来自嘯·寒™ | 1 回应 | 2011-10-22 |
| Capitalism with fewer Chinese characteristics | 来自搞小能 | 2010-07-11 | |
| 我有英文电子版的 需要的留下信箱 | 来自面朝阳光 | 196 回应 | 2011-12-23 |
| CHINAYOUREN 书评 | 来自Absurdfool | 2009-03-02 | |
| 找电子版 | 来自人间的證明 | 2 回应 | 2010-08-06 |
> 浏览更多话题
以下豆列推荐 · · · · · · (全部)
- 【网上可下载到的】英文当代中国书单 (流鱼溟)
- 我要有文化 我看原版书 ([已注销])
- The Economist 2008 Best Books (笨熊)
- 2010年要读的书 (野兽爱智慧)
- 刘瑜的秘密书架 (minox)
谁读这本书?
喜欢这本书的人常去的小组 · · · · · ·

- 研读哈耶克 (1353)

- 香港《21世纪》杂志 (661)

- 质性研究 (276)

- 芝加哥大学社会思想委员 (321)

- 吉登斯 (371)

- 京剧老生首席:余叔岩 (199)

- 华尔街日报 (504)

- 香港科技大学HKUST (999)
喜欢这本书的人关注的活动 · · · · · ·
订阅关于Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics的评论:
feed: rss 2.0











