作者: Paul Graham
出版社: O'Reilly Media
出版年: 2010-5-1
页数: 272
定价: GBP 13.99
装帧: Paperback
ISBN: 9781449389550
内容简介 · · · · · ·
作者简介 · · · · · ·
保罗•格雷厄姆在康奈尔大学读完本科,然后在哈佛大学获得计算机科学博士学位。1995年,他创办了Viaweb,帮助个人用户在网上开店,这是世界上第一个互联网应用程序。1998年夏天,Yahoo!公司收购了Viaweb,收购价约为5000万美元。
此后,他架起了个人网站paulgraham.com,在上面撰写了许许多多关于软件和创业的文章,以深刻的见解和清晰的表达而著称,迅速引起了轰动。2005年,他身体力行,创建了风险投资公司Y Combinator,将自己的理论转化为实践,目前已经资助了80多家... (展开全部) 保罗•格雷厄姆,《黑客与画家》一书的作者,硅谷创业之父。1964年,出生于匹兹堡郊区的一个中产阶级家庭。父亲是设计核反应堆的物理学家,母亲在家照看他和他的妹妹。青少年时代,格雷厄姆就开始编程。但是,他还喜欢许多与计算机无关的东西,这在编程高手之中是很少见的。
保罗•格雷厄姆在康奈尔大学读完本科,然后在哈佛大学获得计算机科学博士学位。1995年,他创办了Viaweb,帮助个人用户在网上开店,这是世界上第一个互联网应用程序。1998年夏天,Yahoo!公司收购了Viaweb,收购价约为5000万美元。
此后,他架起了个人网站paulgraham.com,在上面撰写了许许多多关于软件和创业的文章,以深刻的见解和清晰的表达而著称,迅速引起了轰动。2005年,他身体力行,创建了风险投资公司Y Combinator,将自己的理论转化为实践,目前已经资助了80多家创业公司。现在,他是公认的互联网创业权威。
喜欢读"Hackers & Painters"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·
按有用程度 按页码先后 最新笔记
-
第113页
@SanzoMaldini (42)
In more organized societies, like China, the ruler and his officials used taxation instead of confiscation. But here too we see the same principle: the way to get rich was not to create wealth, but to serve a ruler powerful enough to appropriate it. This started to change in Europe with the rise of the middle class. Now we think of the middle class as people who are neither rich nor poor, but... (更多)
(收起)In more organized societies, like China, the ruler and his officials used taxation instead of confiscation. But here too we see the same principle: the way to get rich was not to create wealth, but to serve a ruler powerful enough to appropriate it. This started to change in Europe with the rise of the middle class. Now we think of the middle class as people who are neither rich nor poor, but originally they were a distinct group. In a feudal society, there are just two classes: a warrior aristocracy, and the serfs who work their estates. The middle class were a new, third group who lived in towns and supported themselves by manufacturing and trade.
2011-08-08 21:47:19 回应
-
chapter 6
a) It's about wealth. Startups are evaluated just by how much wealth they can created. b) Customers are an effective sign to recognize the value of your products. c) Measurement and leverage is the factor of wealth. Once your work is easy to be measured and has much leverage, wealth is a lot closer to you. In an other word , you could double your income as you work two times harder. Worked... (更多)a) It's about wealth. Startups are evaluated just by how much wealth they can created. b) Customers are an effective sign to recognize the value of your products.c) Measurement and leverage is the factor of wealth. Once your work is easy to be measured and has much leverage, wealth is a lot closer to you. In an other word , you could double your income as you work two times harder. Worked ten times harder,you might earn thirty times or more. Thankfully, starting up a company is good way to kick both above. d) Difficulty is a proved way to prevent competiters,especially in big company. As far as I am concerned, technology is an aspect, which is a trap for some tech-addicts at the situation that sources badly limited in startups. (收起)2012-02-13 22:30:54 回应
-
1. Why Nerds Ard Unpopular
Alberti, arguably the archetype of the Renaissance Man, writes that "no art, however minor, demands less than total dedication if you want to excel in it." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Battista_Alberti (更多)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Battista_Alberti (收起)Alberti, arguably the archetype of the Renaissance Man, writes that "no art, however minor, demands less than total dedication if you want to excel in it."
2012-02-01 16:53:06 回应
-
第1页
彼岸嘉瑜 (静。)
But I think that misfits and iconoclasts are also more likely to become hackers. The computer world is like an intellectual Wild West, where you can think anything you want, if you're willing to risk the consequences. When you tread water, you lift yourself up by pushing water down. Likewise, in any social hierarchy, people unsure of their own position will try to emphasize it by maltreating thos... (更多)But I think that misfits and iconoclasts are also more likely to become hackers. The computer world is like an intellectual Wild West, where you can think anything you want, if you're willing to risk the consequences.
When you tread water, you lift yourself up by pushing water down. Likewise, in any social hierarchy, people unsure of their own position will try to emphasize it by maltreating those they think rank below. I've read that this is why poor whites in the United States are the group most hostile to blacks.
We need a language that lets us scribble and smudge and smear, not a language where you have to sit with a teacup of types balanced on your knee and make polite conversation with a strict old aunt of a compiler.
I tended to just spew out code that was hopelessly broken, and gradually beat it into shape. Debugging, I was taught, was a kind of final pass where you caught typos and oversights. The way I worked, it seemed like programming consisted of debugging.
But when you damp oscillations, you lose the high points as well as the low. This is not a problem for big companies, because they don't win by making great products. Big companies win by sucking less than other big companies.
Smilence...If you want to make money, you tend to be forced to work on problems that are too nasty for anyone to solve for free.
Nearly all makers have day jobs early in their careers. Painters and writers notoriously do. If you're lucky you can get a day job closely related to your real work. Musicians often seem to work in record stores. A hacker working on some programming language or operating system might likewise be able to get a day job using it.
Johnson wrote in the preface to his Shakespeare: "He has long outlived his century, the term commonly fixed as the test of literary merit. Whatever advantages he might once derive from personal allusions, local customs, or temporary opinions, have for many years been lost; and every topick of merriment or motive of sorrow, which the modes of artificial life afforded him, now only obscure the scenes which they once illuminated. The effects of favour and competition are at an end; the tradition of his friendships and his enmities has perished; his works support no opinion with arguments, nor supply any faction with invectives; they can neither indulge vanity nor gratify malignity, but are read without any other reason than the desire of pleasure, and are therefore praised only as pleasure is obtained...."
话说,我就是倾向于前期的过度设计... (收起)Everyone by now presumably knows about the danger of premature optimization. I think we should be just as worried about premature design—deciding too early what a program should do. The right tools can help us avoid this danger. A good programming language should, like oil paint, make it easy to change your mind. Dynamic typing is a win here because you don't have to commit to specific data representations up front. But the key to flexibility, I think, is to make the language very abstract. The easiest program to change is one that's short.
2011-06-06 20:09:54 回应
-
第9页
Sometimes, particularly in university math and science departments, nerds deliberately exaggerate their awkwardness in order to seem smarter. (更多)Sometimes, particularly in university math and science departments, nerds deliberately exaggerate their awkwardness in order to seem smarter. (收起)2011-08-13 18:10:31 回应
-
第12页
Now most kids have little idea what their parents do in their distant offices, and see no connection between schoolwork and the work they'll do as adults. ...... What happened? We're against a hard one here. The cause of this problem is the same as the cause of so many present ills: specialization. (更多)Now most kids have little idea what their parents do in their distant offices, and see no connection between schoolwork and the work they'll do as adults.......What happened? We're against a hard one here. The cause of this problem is the same as the cause of so many present ills: specialization. (收起)2011-08-13 18:31:49 回应
-
chapter 6
a) It's about wealth. Startups are evaluated just by how much wealth they can created. b) Customers are an effective sign to recognize the value of your products. c) Measurement and leverage is the factor of wealth. Once your work is easy to be measured and has much leverage, wealth is a lot closer to you. In an other word , you could double your income as you work two times harder. Worked... (更多)a) It's about wealth. Startups are evaluated just by how much wealth they can created. b) Customers are an effective sign to recognize the value of your products.c) Measurement and leverage is the factor of wealth. Once your work is easy to be measured and has much leverage, wealth is a lot closer to you. In an other word , you could double your income as you work two times harder. Worked ten times harder,you might earn thirty times or more. Thankfully, starting up a company is good way to kick both above. d) Difficulty is a proved way to prevent competiters,especially in big company. As far as I am concerned, technology is an aspect, which is a trap for some tech-addicts at the situation that sources badly limited in startups. (收起)2012-02-13 22:30:54 回应
-
1. Why Nerds Ard Unpopular
Alberti, arguably the archetype of the Renaissance Man, writes that "no art, however minor, demands less than total dedication if you want to excel in it." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Battista_Alberti (更多)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Battista_Alberti (收起)Alberti, arguably the archetype of the Renaissance Man, writes that "no art, however minor, demands less than total dedication if you want to excel in it."
2012-02-01 16:53:06 回应
-
Chapter 9. Taste for Makers
onesuper (穷则独善其身,达则兼济姑娘)
Good design is: simple timeless solves the right problem suggestive often slightly funny hard looks easy uses symmetry resembles nature redesign can copy often strange happens in chunks often daring (更多)Good design is:simpletimelesssolves the right problemsuggestiveoften slightly funnyhard looks easyuses symmetry resembles natureredesigncan copyoften strange happens in chunksoften daring (收起)2012-01-15 18:00:33 回应
书评 · · · · · · (共97条) 我来评论这本书
热门评论 最新评论
黑客与画家
-
- Fenng(感谢豆瓣对我Blog的赞助...) URL: http://www.dbanotes.net/review/Hackers_and_Painters.html 四月份读的最好的一本书是 Paul Graham 的大作 《黑客与画家》(中文版),这是一本能引发技术人思考的佳作,真正意义上的黑客精神、创业(Start-up)、编程语言,是这本技术散...... (25回应)2011-05-06 81/86有用来自 人民邮电出版社2011版
数字时代的手工艺人
-
- 师北宸(有人带来了狗屁和五十分) (这是给《商业价值》写的《黑客与画家》,信息量比之前更多一些。) 《黑客与画家》是一本为黑客正名的技术散文集。一提到“熊猫烧香”、网络游戏盗号木马以及某某公司网站系统被人入侵的消息,人们总会联想到是“黑客”干的。实际上,黑客的本意并非如此。在计算机世界中,“黑客”(hacker)指专家级程序员,“黑客”象征着第一...... (5回应)2011-06-15 28/32有用来自 人民邮电出版社2011版
近期几本计算机人士或非计算机人士要读的图书
-
- 风中 第一本:《黑客与画家》 第二本:《新机器的灵魂》 第三本:《设计原本》 《黑客与画家》从书名我们都能看出书中的内容并不深奥,作者最大的目的就是,通过这本书让普通读者理解我们所处的这个计算机时代,揭示它的发展轨迹,帮助你看清我们现在的位置和将来的方向。 《黑客与画家》这本书和另一本获得过普策利奖的...... (8回应)2011-04-19 38/45有用来自 人民邮电出版社2011版
《黑客与画家》读书笔记
-
- iamsujie(iamsujie.com) 这本书是硅谷创业之父,Y Combinator创始人Paul Graham的文集。之所以叫这个名字,是因为作者认为黑客(并非负面的那个意思)与画家有着极大的相似性,他们都是在创造,而不是完成某个任务。 为什么要看这本书?逻辑如下:未来的人类生活不仅是人与人的互动,而是越来越多的与计算机互动,所以必须理解计算机,其关键...... (7回应)2011-06-01 24/27有用来自 人民邮电出版社2011版
《黑客与画家》--真正思考者的文字
-
- 秋叶(不为金钱喜,不为红颜悲) 如果要我评选2011年IT人文类最佳书籍的话,阮一峰翻译的《黑客与画家》毫无疑问是最好的一本,没有之一。 甚至我认为这是近几年在国内出版的类似书籍中最好的一本,很有可能在未来几年还能保持这个地位。 假如你是一个像在互联网行业创业的人,假如你是一个想找到新的实业投资机会的人,假如你是一个想了解顶级人物是如何思...... (10回应)2011-10-14 27/31有用来自 人民邮电出版社2011版
值得一看
-
- Samuel.D(ipensieristretti & ilvisosciol) 书名有标题党的嫌疑,差点就因为书名导致我不想去读他。引起我注意的其实是LISP这个关键字,读完但发现确实有干货。总的来Paul在IT创业方面很有一套,但是技术方面的观点还不能完全消化,或许是阅历不足?过些日子再仔细读读吧 抱歉。。评论太短了......2011-12-15 2/2有用来自 人民邮电出版社2011版
学思维学见解
-
- vancexu(I fight for dream) 前有人做长篇,我简述。 IT相关人员推荐看。可以跟作者学: 思维方法, 人生追求, 行业方向, 创业知识, 技术卓识。 本书是散文集,设计内容广泛。但主线是:启发人们变成黑客那样独特的人(黑客:简单解释为专家级程序员,非坏人)。 作者生动的语言+独到的见解,真正让读者跟着思考,不知不觉就跟着牛人作者......2012-02-12 来自 人民邮电出版社2011版
一点点关于社会进程的感想
-
- 跌宕的月光 看了很多书评,里边很多提到了IT创业,lisp语言等等。我想这些内容非常棒,也是一个主要的内容,上边很多读者都有所提及,而且评价的相当棒。 不过,我在“如何创造财富”这一章,倒是看到了一些关于历史进程很重要的观点:17世纪的英国,就像现在很多第三世界国家一样,当官还是得到财富最多的工作。而贿赂(corruptio......2012-02-12 来自 人民邮电出版社2011版
太啰嗦了!又是一本赚稿费的书
-
- alava 太啰嗦了!又是一本赚稿费的书。或许只有不是以写书为职业的人才能写出真正的好书,因为他们时间有限,也不想凑字数赚稿费,所以总是力求以最简介的语言把问题写清楚...(评论竟然也有字数限制!难道豆瓣也要靠字数来吸引读者?)......2012-02-12 来自 人民邮电出版社2011版
读 Hackers 的几点收获
-
- uNiCorn 同时喜欢画画和编程的同学,感觉都有点小清新 不是在写代码,而是在创作产品 收获较多的几点就是: 1. 要做可衡量和可放大的事情,才是能够赚钱 悲催,在大公司被磨砺的不行,干好干坏没有太大区别,在大公司优秀了好几年才明白这个道理,其实拿的都差不多,看来要早点看这个书才对 2. List语言 ......2012-02-06 来自 人民邮电出版社2011版
读到关注财富分化这一章了
-
- 骑木马的哥哥(没有伞的孩子,只有努力奔跑) 很好的书,让我开阔了编程的思维。并不是为了单纯的编程而编程,而是用编程语言创造出人们需要的东西。目前正在读,很棒的书!从这本了解了编程的本质,最重要的是关于创业,很喜欢里面的思维,把一些当今现实的东西用简单的例子描述出来。就像第一章,书呆子为什么不受欢迎,书上例句了生动的例子。当然里面有关创业的方法可以借鉴,毕竟这是国......2012-02-05 来自 人民邮电出版社2011版
书中对极权的抨击
-
- zxg0809101112 书中对极权的抨击给我留下了很深的印象。 我本以为有那些想法是因为我太愤青了,看了这本书后,我才明白:对极权的厌恶是技术人员的天性。 抱歉,你的评论太短了。 抱歉,你的评论太短了。 抱歉,你的评论太短了。 抱歉,你的评论太短了。 抱歉,你的评论太短了。 抱歉,你的评论太短了。 抱歉,你的评论太......2012-01-05 来自 人民邮电出版社2011版
"Hackers & Painters"的论坛 · · · · · ·
| 在某人blog提到这本书 | 来自Alvin | 2010-08-29 |
在哪儿买这本书? · · · · · ·
- 亚马逊 (RMB 114.00)
- 查看1家网店价格 (114.00元起)
- 加入购书单 多本比价 批量购买 已在购书单
这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部5 )
- 人民邮电出版社版 2011-4 / 2754人读过 / 有售
- O'Reilly版 2006-02-01 / 16人读过
- O'Reilly Media, Inc.版 May, 2004 / 186人读过
- オーム社版 2005-1 / 0
以下豆列推荐 · · · · · · (全部)
- [BooX]一周一书 (LInd)
- 计算机原理 —— To 小男 (九间)
- READ@KINDLE (LInd)
- Read on Kindle (iamxhu)
- Good Books (不勇敢的心)
谁读这本书?
喜欢这本书的人关注的活动 · · · · · ·
订阅关于Hackers & Painters的评论:
feed: rss 2.0











