第19页
- 页码:第19页
关于一个时代的精神状态与精神病理学之间的关系: In a way which we cannot yet properly understand, the shift between these two existential predicaments seems to be matched by a recent change in the dominant pattrns of psychopathology. It has frequently been remarked by psychoanalysts that the period in which hysterics and patients with phobias and fixations formed the bulk of their clientele, starting in their classical period with Freud, has recently given way to a time when the main complains centre around 'ego loss', or a sense of emptiness, flatness, futility, lack of purpose, or loss of self-esteem. Just what the relation is between these style of pathology and the non-pathological predicaments which parallel them is very unclear. In order even to have a serious try at understanding this, we would have to gain a better grasp of the structures of the self, something I want to attempt below. But it seems overwhelmingly plausible a priori that there is some relation; and that the comparatively recent shift in style of pathology reflects the generalization and popularization in our culture of that 'loss of horizon', which a few alert spirits were foretelling for a century or more.
hztz对本书的所有笔记 · · · · · ·
-
第17页
To the extent that one sees the finding of a believable framework as the object of a qu...
-
第18页
关于现代社会的“自我及人生意义的丧失”: We find the sense of life through articulating...
-
第19页
-
第20页
至少两点很有意思:1. 何为理性reason?;2. 疑似尼采vs苏格拉底。 the honour ethic... The ...
-
第21页
1. 柏拉图之后理论的重要性,对比福柯在主体解释学中指出的亚里士多德之后的理论化倾向。 Pla...
说明 · · · · · ·
表示其中内容是对原文的摘抄