As the chapter concludes Husserl has brought to light the essential correlation between noesis and noema. He has introduced the new concept of noema which is meant to cover all that is involved in “the perceived as such”, “the judged as such”, and he has also begun to recognize how differences in the noetic bring about changes in the noema. Only hinted at in this chapter is the complex manner in which sense-contents (what Husserl calls the “hyletic” contents) are actually part of the noetic character of the act. The object intended is characterized primarily as transcendent. In order for different noetic acts to be anchored to the same intentional object there must be a common “noematic core”. These are all discoveries on which the discussions in Chapter Four will build.引自 莫兰对第三编前几节的总结