I. Introduction
1. Myths of LaPlacean Omniscience
Realism for Limited Beings in a Rich Messy World
Social Natures
Heuristics as Adaptations for the Real World
Nature as Backwoods Mechanic and Used-Parts Dealer
Error and Change
Organization and Aims of This Book
2. Normative Idealizations versus the Metabolism of Error
Inadequacies of Our Normative Idealizations
Satisficing, Heuristics, and Possible Behavior for Real Agents
The Productive Use of Error-Prone Procedures
3. Toward a Philosophy for Limited Beings
The Stance and Outlook of a Scientifically Informed Philosophy of Science
Ceteris Paribus, Complexity, and Philosophical Method
Our Present and Future Naturalistic Philosophical Methods
II. Problem-Solving Strategies for Complex Systems
4. Robustness, Reliability, and Overdetermination
Common Features of Concepts of Robustness
Robustness and the Structure of Theories
Robustness, Testability, and the Nature of Theoretical Terms
Robustness, Redundancy, and Discovery
Robustness, Objectification, and Realism
Robustness and Levels of Organization
Heuristics and Robustness
Robustness, Independence, and Pseudo-Robustness: A Case Study
5. Heuristics and the Study of Human Behavior
Heuristics
Reductionist Research Strategies and Their Biases
An Example of Reductionist Biases: Models of Group Selection
Heuristics Can Hide Their Tracks
Two Strategies for Correcting Reductionist Biases
The Importance of Heuristics in the Study of Human Behavior
6. False Models as Means to Truer Theories
Even the Best Models Have “Biases”
The Concept of a “Neutral Model”
How Models Can Misrepresent
Twelve Things To Do with False Models
Background of the Debate over Linkage Mapping in Genetics
Castle’s Attack on the “Linear Linkage” Model
Muller’s Data and the Haldane Mapping Function
Muller’s “Two-Dimensional” Arguments against Castle
Multiply-Counterfactual Uses of False Models
False Models Can Provide New Predictive Tests Highlighting Features of a Preferred Model
False Models and Adaptive Design Arguments
Summary and Conclusions
7. Robustness and Entrenchment: How the Contingent Becomes Necessary
Generative Entrenchment and the Architecture of Adaptive Design
Generative Systems Come To Dominate in Evolutionary Processes
Resistance to Foundational Revisions
Bootstrapping Feedbacks: Differential Dependencies and Stable Generators
Implications of Generative Entrenchment
Generative Entrenchment and Robustness
Conclusion
8. Lewontin’s Evidence (That There Isn’t Any)
Is Evidence Impotent, or Just Inconstant?
False Models as Means to Truer Theories
Narrative Accounts and Theory as Montage
III. Reductionism(s) in Practice
9. Complexity and Organization
Reductionism and the Analysis of Complex Systems
Complexity
Evolution, Complexity, and Organization
Complexity and the Localization of Function
10. The Ontology of Complex Systems: Levels of Organization, Perspectives, and Causal Thickets
Robustness and Reality
Levels of Organization
Perspectives: A Preliminary Characterization
Causal Thickets
11. Reductive Explanation: A Functional Account
Two Kinds of Rational Reconstruction
Successional versus Inter-Level Reduction
Levels of Organization and the Co-Evolution and Development of Interlevel Theories
Two Views of Explanation: Major Factors and Mechanisms versus Laws and Deductive Completeness
Levels of Organization and Explanatory Costs and Benefits
An Example: The Assumption of “the Purity of the Gametes” in the Heterozygote
Identificatory Hypotheses as Tools in the Search for Explanations
Appendix: Modifications Appropriate to a Cost-Benefit Version of Salmon’s Account of Explanation
12. Emergence as Non-Aggregativity and the Biases of Reductionism(s)
Reduction and Emergence
Aggregativity
Perspectival, Contextual, and Representational Complexities; or, “It Ain’t Quite So Simple as That!”
Adaptation to Fine- and Coarse-Grained Environments: Derivational Paradoxes for a Formal Account of Aggregativity
Aggregativity and Dimensionality
Aggregativity as a Heuristic for Evaluating Decompositions, and Our Concepts of Natural Kinds
Reductionisms and Biases Revisited
IV. Engineering an Evolutionary View of Science
13. Epilogue: On the Softening of the “Hard” Sciences
13. Epilogue: On the Softening of the “Hard” Sciences
From Straw-Man Reductionist to Lover of Complexity
Messiness in State-of-the-Art Theoretical Physics
Hidden Elegance and Revelations in Run-of-the-Mill Applied Science
“Pure” versus Applied Science, and What Difference Should It Make?
Hortatory Closure
Appendix A. Important Properties of Heuristics
Appendix B. Common Reductionistic Heuristics
Appendix C. Glossary of Key Concepts and Assumptions
Appendix D. A Panoply of LaPlacean and Leibnizian Demons
Notes
Bibliography
Credits
Index
· · · · · · (
收起)
1 有用 宇凡 2022-08-04 18:02:14
看了model一章和词汇表。。虽然很早看导师引用过Wimsatt关于emergence论述,现在才看,很有启发,尤其赞同对科学哲学的嘲讽,对哲学家式realism的批评。
1 有用 椰褐 2022-04-27 03:52:11
一本类似宣言的主张一种特定的分析哲学思路的论文集,主要思想不复杂了,就是我们的头脑是进化的产物,一些我们传统哲学中认为是“障碍”和“误导”和必须被“克服”的内容其实才是人类最重要的东西。人的厉害之处不是我们比计算机聪明,而是计算机需要用掉几个小镇电力才想得清楚的问题我们人类吃个苹果可以轻易解决。另一个核心思想是反对分析哲学内部的某种彻底性,但是这种反对恰恰是生物哲学的罩门,因为求极限或许也是一个人... 一本类似宣言的主张一种特定的分析哲学思路的论文集,主要思想不复杂了,就是我们的头脑是进化的产物,一些我们传统哲学中认为是“障碍”和“误导”和必须被“克服”的内容其实才是人类最重要的东西。人的厉害之处不是我们比计算机聪明,而是计算机需要用掉几个小镇电力才想得清楚的问题我们人类吃个苹果可以轻易解决。另一个核心思想是反对分析哲学内部的某种彻底性,但是这种反对恰恰是生物哲学的罩门,因为求极限或许也是一个人类进化出来的思路,放弃求极限事情或许反而变得无必要地复杂了。总体来说对相关研究者肯定是必读了。 (展开)
1 有用 宇凡 2022-08-04 18:02:14
看了model一章和词汇表。。虽然很早看导师引用过Wimsatt关于emergence论述,现在才看,很有启发,尤其赞同对科学哲学的嘲讽,对哲学家式realism的批评。
1 有用 椰褐 2022-04-27 03:52:11
一本类似宣言的主张一种特定的分析哲学思路的论文集,主要思想不复杂了,就是我们的头脑是进化的产物,一些我们传统哲学中认为是“障碍”和“误导”和必须被“克服”的内容其实才是人类最重要的东西。人的厉害之处不是我们比计算机聪明,而是计算机需要用掉几个小镇电力才想得清楚的问题我们人类吃个苹果可以轻易解决。另一个核心思想是反对分析哲学内部的某种彻底性,但是这种反对恰恰是生物哲学的罩门,因为求极限或许也是一个人... 一本类似宣言的主张一种特定的分析哲学思路的论文集,主要思想不复杂了,就是我们的头脑是进化的产物,一些我们传统哲学中认为是“障碍”和“误导”和必须被“克服”的内容其实才是人类最重要的东西。人的厉害之处不是我们比计算机聪明,而是计算机需要用掉几个小镇电力才想得清楚的问题我们人类吃个苹果可以轻易解决。另一个核心思想是反对分析哲学内部的某种彻底性,但是这种反对恰恰是生物哲学的罩门,因为求极限或许也是一个人类进化出来的思路,放弃求极限事情或许反而变得无必要地复杂了。总体来说对相关研究者肯定是必读了。 (展开)