Max Stirner (1806-1856) is recognized in the history of political thought because of his egoist classic The Ego and Its Own. Stirner was a student of Hegel, and a critic of the Young Hegelians and the emerging forms of socialist and communist thought in the 1840s. Max Stirner's Dialectical Egoism: A New Interpretation examines Stirner's thought as a critique of modernity, by which he meant the domination of culture and politics by humanist ideology. In Stirner's view, 'humanity' is the supreme being of modernity and 'humanism' is the prevailing legitimation of social and political domination. Welsh traces Stirner's thought from his early essays to The Ego and Its Own and Stirner's responses to his critics. He also examines how Benjamin Tucker, James L. Walker, and Dora Marsden applied Stirner's dialectical egoism to the analysis of (a) the transformations of capitalism, (b) culture, ethics, and mass psychology, and (c) feminism, socialism, and communism. All three viewed Stirner as a champion of individuality against the collectivizing and homogenizing forces of the modern world. Welsh also takes great care to dissociate Stirner's thought from that of the other great egoist critic of modernity, Friedrich Nietzsche. He argues that the similarities in the dissidence of Stirner and Nietzsche are superficial. The book concludes with an interpretation of Stirner's thought as a form of dialectical egoism that includes (a) a multi-tiered analysis of culture, society, and individuality; (b) the basic principles of Stirner's view of the relationship between individuals and social organization; and (c) the forms of critique he employs. Stirner's critique of modernity is a significant contribution to the growing literature on libertarianism, dialectical analysis, and post-modernism.
0 有用 小小王2.0 2023-12-31 18:20:21 北京
只读了施蒂纳部分。算是施蒂纳研究中比较优秀的。把施蒂纳放置在黑格尔哲学和青年黑格尔派的框架下进行考察。把施蒂纳的书归结为现代戏批判,辩证利己主义批判。作者认为,在施蒂纳看来,现代性就是“思想的统治”或者说人本主义的抽象和集体范畴对思想和行动的统治。而施蒂纳的辩证利己主义批判就是为了促进个人的自我解放,主张个人对自己的生活、身体、思想和行动拥有所有权。感觉作者把施蒂纳的理论过于美化了,没有意识到施蒂... 只读了施蒂纳部分。算是施蒂纳研究中比较优秀的。把施蒂纳放置在黑格尔哲学和青年黑格尔派的框架下进行考察。把施蒂纳的书归结为现代戏批判,辩证利己主义批判。作者认为,在施蒂纳看来,现代性就是“思想的统治”或者说人本主义的抽象和集体范畴对思想和行动的统治。而施蒂纳的辩证利己主义批判就是为了促进个人的自我解放,主张个人对自己的生活、身体、思想和行动拥有所有权。感觉作者把施蒂纳的理论过于美化了,没有意识到施蒂纳的一些突出的问题,比如他没有区分国家和社会,没有正确理解资本的运动等等。这也是马克思所说的,苦于资本主义不发达的问题。个人认为,马克思比施蒂纳突出的地方是他所理解的“思想的统治”是商品货币资本范畴的统治,而不是人的范畴的统治。 (展开)
0 有用 小小王2.0 2023-12-31 18:20:21 北京
只读了施蒂纳部分。算是施蒂纳研究中比较优秀的。把施蒂纳放置在黑格尔哲学和青年黑格尔派的框架下进行考察。把施蒂纳的书归结为现代戏批判,辩证利己主义批判。作者认为,在施蒂纳看来,现代性就是“思想的统治”或者说人本主义的抽象和集体范畴对思想和行动的统治。而施蒂纳的辩证利己主义批判就是为了促进个人的自我解放,主张个人对自己的生活、身体、思想和行动拥有所有权。感觉作者把施蒂纳的理论过于美化了,没有意识到施蒂... 只读了施蒂纳部分。算是施蒂纳研究中比较优秀的。把施蒂纳放置在黑格尔哲学和青年黑格尔派的框架下进行考察。把施蒂纳的书归结为现代戏批判,辩证利己主义批判。作者认为,在施蒂纳看来,现代性就是“思想的统治”或者说人本主义的抽象和集体范畴对思想和行动的统治。而施蒂纳的辩证利己主义批判就是为了促进个人的自我解放,主张个人对自己的生活、身体、思想和行动拥有所有权。感觉作者把施蒂纳的理论过于美化了,没有意识到施蒂纳的一些突出的问题,比如他没有区分国家和社会,没有正确理解资本的运动等等。这也是马克思所说的,苦于资本主义不发达的问题。个人认为,马克思比施蒂纳突出的地方是他所理解的“思想的统治”是商品货币资本范畴的统治,而不是人的范畴的统治。 (展开)