一点记录
书很好,权威著作。作为选编文集,有韦伯的详细介绍,政治倾向和思想缘由(Introduction: the man and his work),这之后有四大部分,分别是science and politics(收录两篇演讲稿),power, religion, social structures。最后一部分里还讲了日本与中国的社会治理和政治概况。
时间原因,只读了第二部分Power中的一节“Class, Status, Party”,其实讲的是社会分层stratification。三者分别对应property, social prestige, political power。其实就是社会学界公认的“财富、声望和权力”吧,之前在杨继绳先生的《中国现当代阶层分析》一书中看到就是如此分类,想必是借鉴了韦伯。韦伯把经济和物质条件放在第一来考量,可见马克思对其影响。不过韦伯的“class”和马克思的略有不同,他仅用经济和市场上的property来界定class。status group是有social honor (prestige)决定的,常常体现在styles of life上,但是根本上、长远上还是经济因素占先,这个观点肯定是启迪了Boudieu的,即taste是一种social distinction。最后一个政治权力的,不多言了。综合说来:social order = distribution of honor - status groups; economic order - distribution of wealth = class; political order = distribution of power = parties。
引一句话作结,跟上文讲的马克思和布尔迪昂有承前启后的表达:With some over-simplication, one might thus say that 'classes' are stratified according to their relations to the production and acquisition of goods; whereas 'status groups' are stratified according to the principles of their consumption of goods as represented by special 'styles of life'. (p.193)
时间原因,只读了第二部分Power中的一节“Class, Status, Party”,其实讲的是社会分层stratification。三者分别对应property, social prestige, political power。其实就是社会学界公认的“财富、声望和权力”吧,之前在杨继绳先生的《中国现当代阶层分析》一书中看到就是如此分类,想必是借鉴了韦伯。韦伯把经济和物质条件放在第一来考量,可见马克思对其影响。不过韦伯的“class”和马克思的略有不同,他仅用经济和市场上的property来界定class。status group是有social honor (prestige)决定的,常常体现在styles of life上,但是根本上、长远上还是经济因素占先,这个观点肯定是启迪了Boudieu的,即taste是一种social distinction。最后一个政治权力的,不多言了。综合说来:social order = distribution of honor - status groups; economic order - distribution of wealth = class; political order = distribution of power = parties。
引一句话作结,跟上文讲的马克思和布尔迪昂有承前启后的表达:With some over-simplication, one might thus say that 'classes' are stratified according to their relations to the production and acquisition of goods; whereas 'status groups' are stratified according to the principles of their consumption of goods as represented by special 'styles of life'. (p.193)
有关键情节透露