Skeptical and heuristic realism are easily conflated. The difference is this. Skeptical realism denies that moral considerations should have any weight in reasoning about international conduct, either because they have no meaning or because there is no reason to take an interest in them. Heuristic realism, while allowing in principle that moral considerations can have weight (and that we may have reason to take an interest in them), argues as a matter of historical fact that the attempt to apply these considerations in practical reasoning tends to produce undesirable outcomes or even to be self-defeating. To put the difference another way, skeptical realism is a philosophical doctrine, whereas heuristic realism is casuistical—that is, concerned with the application of principles to practic... (查看原文)
0 有用 埃里克·布莱尔 2013-03-16 16:59:10
世界主义。one available choice
0 有用 洛极克猫😺 2013-10-29 11:41:02
看了第三部分，不是太懂，把罗尔斯的正义论推到国际层面可能吗？
0 有用 侠大卷 2023-01-17 21:15:34 广东
1周极限看完此书 世界主义我点了
0 有用 UMleader 2020-07-17 23:50:11
曾经试图改进和发展罗尔斯理论的学者。但是这本书看起来也不太复合国际关系学科的审美，基本就是把应用于国内的理论套到了国际上
0 有用 弈心者歌 2017-07-17 16:45:57
国际正义分配
0 有用 侠大卷 2023-01-17 21:15:34 广东
1周极限看完此书 世界主义我点了
0 有用 UMleader 2020-07-17 23:50:11
曾经试图改进和发展罗尔斯理论的学者。但是这本书看起来也不太复合国际关系学科的审美，基本就是把应用于国内的理论套到了国际上
0 有用 弈心者歌 2017-07-17 16:45:57
国际正义分配
0 有用 洛极克猫😺 2013-10-29 11:41:02
看了第三部分，不是太懂，把罗尔斯的正义论推到国际层面可能吗？
0 有用 埃里克·布莱尔 2013-03-16 16:59:10
世界主义。one available choice