Naomi Mitchison, daughter of a distinguished scientist, sister of geneticist J B S Haldane, was always interested in the sciences, especially genetics. Her novels did not tend to demonstrate this, and she did not publish a Science Fiction novel until almost forty years into her fiction-writing career. Isobel Murray's Introduction here argues that it is by no means 'pure' Science Fiction: the success of the novel depends not only on the extraordinarily variety of life forms its heroine encounters and attempts to communicate with on different worlds: she is also a very credible human, or Terran, with recognisibly human emotions and a dramatic emotional life. This novel works effectively for readers who usually eschew the genre and prefer more traditional narratives. Explorers like Mary are an elite class who consider curiosity to be Terrans' supreme gift, and in the novel she more than once takes risks that may destroy her life. Her voice, as she records her adventures and experiments, is individual, attractive and memorable. Isobel Murray is Emeritus Professor of Modern Scottish Literature at the University of Aberdeen.
0 有用 Eileen 2016-05-21 01:04:53
果然是“我们的征途是星辰大海”。。。。
0 有用 默默 2025-02-07 18:31:49 上海
每一次新世界的跨物种探索都是一次挑战认知边界的尝试。不过相对来说,Radiate和Epsie的part都太寻常了,不够mind-shattering,caterpillar和butterfly这一组确实有趣,最有趣也最震撼的是grafts这部分,有些温情版异形的感觉了,如果把这部分拓展下会是个超好看的故事。但是作者显然意不在讲故事而只是谈一些ideas,故事讲得太松散了,几乎无叙事技巧可言(但是走... 每一次新世界的跨物种探索都是一次挑战认知边界的尝试。不过相对来说,Radiate和Epsie的part都太寻常了,不够mind-shattering,caterpillar和butterfly这一组确实有趣,最有趣也最震撼的是grafts这部分,有些温情版异形的感觉了,如果把这部分拓展下会是个超好看的故事。但是作者显然意不在讲故事而只是谈一些ideas,故事讲得太松散了,几乎无叙事技巧可言(但是走philosophical sf的路子吧,语言又不够美)。另外让我在意的点是,Mary对任何物种都抱开放心态,实验室的好几个动物都是她的朋友都有自己的名字和性格,可他们的饲养员就从头到尾只是一个technician,不配有名字---这不也是另一种傲慢和隔离? (展开)
0 有用 伯德兰 2017-12-10 20:27:20
New Wave 作品之一,现在一流的科幻评论家对那个时代的作品几乎没有不染指的。不过研究生论文评论了两本女性乌托邦,略感审美疲劳了。