How Soon Is Now? performs a powerful critique of modernist temporal regimes through its revelatory exploration of queer ways of being in time and the potential queerness of time itself. Carolyn Dinshaw focuses on medieval tales of asynchrony and on engagements with these medieval temporal worlds by amateur readers centuries later. In doing so, she illuminates forms of desirous, embodied being that are out of sync with ordinarily linear measurements of everyday life, that involve multiple temporalities, that precipitate out of time altogether. Dinshaw claims the possibility of a fuller, denser, more crowded now that theorists tell us is extant but that often eludes our temporal grasp. Whether discussing Victorian men of letters who parodied the Book of John Mandeville, a fictionalized fourteenth-century travel narrative, or Hope Emily Allen, modern co-editor of the early-fifteenth-century Book of Margery Kempe, Dinshaw argues that these and other medievalists outside the academy inhabit different temporalities than modern professionals operating according to the clock. How Soon Is Now? clears space for amateurs, hobbyists, and dabblers who approach medieval worlds from positions of affect and attachment, from desires to build other kinds of worlds. Unruly, untimely, they urge us toward a disorderly and asynchronous collective.
0 有用 0k119xtycuffir 2025-05-21 09:36:28 四川
酷儿性的时间维度,对nostalgia的重解:不仅是对理想化的过去的向往/逃避,可能也是一种生存策略,尤其对于那些与“家”的关系被扰乱的人(各种酷儿)来说。将queer拓展到特定的时间体验/存在方式,强调非线性、非同步性、依恋性和情感投入在构建替代性时间认知中的重要性…(我对这种拓展持审慎态度…)
0 有用 Barroquería 2024-06-12 08:28:38 美国
queer intimacy—experiences of non-contemporaneous contemporaneity-in archives