In 1968, at the height of the Cultural Revolution, the Chinese Communist Party endorsed a radical new system of healthcare delivery for the rural masses. Soon every village had at least one barefoot doctor to provide basic medical care, which integrated the villages into a regional network of healthcare services for the very first time. The barefoot doctors were portrayed natio...
In 1968, at the height of the Cultural Revolution, the Chinese Communist Party endorsed a radical new system of healthcare delivery for the rural masses. Soon every village had at least one barefoot doctor to provide basic medical care, which integrated the villages into a regional network of healthcare services for the very first time. The barefoot doctors were portrayed nationally and internationally as revolutionary heroes, wading undaunted through rice-paddies to bring effective, low-cost care to poor peasants.
This book is the first comprehensive study to reach beyond the nostalgic view of barefoot doctors that dominates present scholarship on public health in China. Author Xiaoping Fang provides evidence drawn from local archives during the Cultural Revolution and personal interviews with patients and doctors, contextualizing it within the broader history of medicine in revolutionary and post-reform China. His data demonstrates that the key impact of the barefoot doctor program was its introduction of modern Western medicine into villages that were hitherto dominated by traditional Chinese medicine. Although traditional methods were marginalized by the innovations and improved outcomes Western medicine brought, Chinese medicine continued to exist as an alternative approach.
This book ultimately offers a powerful and carefully contextualized critique of conventional views on the role of barefoot doctors, their legacy, and their impact, both in rural areas and in China as a whole, while making theoretical contributions to the Chinese social historiography of medicine.
Barefoot Doctors and Western Medicine in China的创作者
· · · · · ·
6 有用 钝刀龙戈 2017-06-09 16:37:52
讲中国故事的英文书都不难读。史料很丰富,但作者似乎没有仔细鉴别,因此还达不到专业历史学的水准。比如邓小平的“穿鞋医生”论,最后“皮鞋”一说据考证是被捏造(杨念群),作者却直接相信了那个时期的《人民日报》报道。
0 有用 Fringe 2019-10-06 12:21:43
没有中译本,目前赤脚医生研究的创新之作,丰富、多元的史料以及新颖的观点值得医学史学者驻足研习。
1 有用 Dan_Moto 2019-11-24 23:39:36
这是一本很详实的医学人类学著作,也因此有一些史料的选择欠缺。提出的观点可能会觉得很有新意(毕竟与官方宣传不同),却与我在调研中在其他地方观察到的一致,或许这就是现代性的中国叙事在现代性和民族性双重性话语下的有趣张力。
0 有用 人间别久不成悲 2023-07-28 14:34:56 新疆
翻阅。在用土方子治病的同时,赤脚医生们也在传播西医。毛时代农村医疗体系崩塌不在于民众不接受,而是医生不干了——没有人是魔鬼,但也没人是天生的天使
0 有用 Sisyphebel 2024-09-02 13:10:09 美国
也許7/10? 紮實。通過杭州村鎮一帶的資料作為切入點理解赤腳醫生. 成書時期其實很反應的是寫作的zeitgeist (2000年初到2010年)— 整體上還是偏market liberalism 以及一種(Anglophone?)universalism。 西醫是否就是現代性/現代化 依然會是一個點(當然中西醫二元對立 另說)— 但是其實說白了就是一個實用性(西藥/消炎藥確實會相對來說更實用)的... 也許7/10? 紮實。通過杭州村鎮一帶的資料作為切入點理解赤腳醫生. 成書時期其實很反應的是寫作的zeitgeist (2000年初到2010年)— 整體上還是偏market liberalism 以及一種(Anglophone?)universalism。 西醫是否就是現代性/現代化 依然會是一個點(當然中西醫二元對立 另說)— 但是其實說白了就是一個實用性(西藥/消炎藥確實會相對來說更實用)的考量。 倒是好奇赤腳醫生所帶來的「現代性」/「職業化」 和49年以前具體有什麼區別呢? 以及覺得這本書如果是在當下寫 可能會變化很多吧(太多太多的變化了). 只能說all history is contemporary history. 能討論得還有很多… (展开)