A bold rethinking of the most powerful political idea in the world—democracy—and the story of how radical democracy can yet transform America
Democracy has been the American religion since before the Revolution—from New England town halls to the multicultural democracy of Atlantic pirate ships. But can our current political system, one that seems responsive only to the wealthi...
A bold rethinking of the most powerful political idea in the world—democracy—and the story of how radical democracy can yet transform America
Democracy has been the American religion since before the Revolution—from New England town halls to the multicultural democracy of Atlantic pirate ships. But can our current political system, one that seems responsive only to the wealthiest among us and leaves most Americans feeling disengaged, voiceless, and disenfranchised, really be called democratic? And if the tools of our democracy are not working to solve the rising crises we face, how can we—average citizens—make change happen?
David Graeber, one of the most influential scholars and activists of his generation, takes readers on a journey through the idea of democracy, provocatively reorienting our understanding of pivotal historical moments, and extracts their lessons for today—from the birth of Athenian democracy and the founding of the United States of America to the global revolutions of the twentieth century and the rise of a new generation of activists. Underlying it all is a bracing argument that in the face of increasingly concentrated wealth and power in this country, a reenergized, reconceived democracy—one based on consensus, equality, and broad participation—can yet provide us with the just, free, and fair society we want.
The Democracy Project tells the story of the resilience of the democratic spirit and the adaptability of the democratic idea. It offers a fresh take on vital history and an impassioned argument that radical democracy is, more than ever, our best hope.
“Written in a brash, engaging style, the book is also a philosophical inquiry into the nature of debt—where it came from and how it evolved.” —The New York Times Book Review
“Fresh ... fascinating ... thought-provoking [and] exceedingly timely.”— Financial Times
“The book is more readable and entertaining than I can indicate. . . . Graeber is a scholarly researcher, an activist and a public intellectual. His field is the whole history of social and economic transactions.” — Peter Carey , The Observer
“One of the year’s most influential books. Graeber situates the emergence of credit within the rise of class society, the destruction of societies based on ‘webs of mutual commitment’ and the constantly implied threat of physical violence that lies behind all social relations based on money.”—Paul Mason, The Guardian
“Part anthropological history and part provocative political argument, it’s a useful corrective to what passes for contemporary conversation about debt and the economy.”—Jesse Singal, The Boston Globe
“Terrific . . . In the best anthropological tradition, he helps us reset our everyday ideas by exploring history and other civilizations, then boomeranging back to render our own world strange, and more open to change.” — Raj Patel, The Globe and Mail
作者简介
· · · · · ·
David Graeber is an American anthropologist, political activist and author. He is currently a professor at the London School of Economics and was formerly an associate professor of anthropology at Yale University. David also played a role in the Global Justice Movement and was one of the earlier organisers of Occupy Wall Street. He is the author of numerous books including The ...
David Graeber is an American anthropologist, political activist and author. He is currently a professor at the London School of Economics and was formerly an associate professor of anthropology at Yale University. David also played a role in the Global Justice Movement and was one of the earlier organisers of Occupy Wall Street. He is the author of numerous books including The Democracy Project, and Debt: The First 5,000 Years (2011)
目录
· · · · · ·
Introduction
1. The Beginning Is Near
2. Why Did It Work?
3. “The Mob Begin to Think and to Reason”: The Covert History of Democracy
4. How Change Happens
5. Breaking the Spell
· · · · · ·
(更多)
Introduction
1. The Beginning Is Near
2. Why Did It Work?
3. “The Mob Begin to Think and to Reason”: The Covert History of Democracy
4. How Change Happens
5. Breaking the Spell
Dedication
Acknowledgments
Notes
· · · · · · (收起)
原文摘录 · · · · · ·
Marisa came to that next GA, and during breakout we got the idea of initiating a Trainings working group. Our group was composed mainly of young activists who had cut their teeth at Bloombergville. They were enthusiastic about the idea of consensus process and direction action, but few has any real experience with either. Process at first was a shambles -- many participants didn't seem to understand that a block (that is, a veto--normally to be appealed to only as a last resort) was different than a "no" vote, and even facilitates, who were supposed to be running the meetings, tended to start each discussion of proposals not by asking if anyone had clarifying questions or concerns, but by simply saying, "Okay, that's the proposal. Any blocks?" Apart from trainings on democratic process, th... (查看原文)
Marisa came to that next GA, and during breakout we got the idea of initiating a Trainings working group. Our group was composed mainly of young activists who had cut their teeth at Bloombergville. They were enthusiastic about the idea of consensus process and direction action, but few has any real experience with either. Process at first was a shambles -- many participants didn't seem to under...
2015-02-25 12:24
Marisa came to that next GA, and during breakout we got the idea of initiating a Trainings working group. Our group was composed mainly of young activists who had cut their teeth at Bloombergville. They were enthusiastic about the idea of consensus process and direction action, but few has any real experience with either. Process at first was a shambles -- many participants didn't seem to understand that a block (that is, a veto--normally to be appealed to only as a last resort) was different than a "no" vote, and even facilitates, who were supposed to be running the meetings, tended to start each discussion of proposals not by asking if anyone had clarifying questions or concerns, but by simply saying, "Okay, that's the proposal. Any blocks?" Apart from trainings on democratic process, there was a shortage basic street skills: we needed to find people to provide legal trainings, if nothing else so everyone would know what to do if they were arrested, as some of us were definitely going to be, whether or not we decided to do anything illegal. We need more, still: medical training, to know what to do if someone next to them was injured and civil disobedience training...引自 MEETING
Marisa came to that next GA, and during breakout we got the idea of initiating a Trainings working group. Our group was composed mainly of young activists who had cut their teeth at Bloombergville. They were enthusiastic about the idea of consensus process and direction action, but few has any real experience with either. Process at first was a shambles -- many participants didn't seem to under...
2015-02-25 12:24
Marisa came to that next GA, and during breakout we got the idea of initiating a Trainings working group. Our group was composed mainly of young activists who had cut their teeth at Bloombergville. They were enthusiastic about the idea of consensus process and direction action, but few has any real experience with either. Process at first was a shambles -- many participants didn't seem to understand that a block (that is, a veto--normally to be appealed to only as a last resort) was different than a "no" vote, and even facilitates, who were supposed to be running the meetings, tended to start each discussion of proposals not by asking if anyone had clarifying questions or concerns, but by simply saying, "Okay, that's the proposal. Any blocks?" Apart from trainings on democratic process, there was a shortage basic street skills: we needed to find people to provide legal trainings, if nothing else so everyone would know what to do if they were arrested, as some of us were definitely going to be, whether or not we decided to do anything illegal. We need more, still: medical training, to know what to do if someone next to them was injured and civil disobedience training...引自 MEETING
Marisa came to that next GA, and during breakout we got the idea of initiating a Trainings working group. Our group was composed mainly of young activists who had cut their teeth at Bloombergville. They were enthusiastic about the idea of consensus process and direction action, but few has any real experience with either. Process at first was a shambles -- many participants didn't seem to under...
2015-02-25 12:24
Marisa came to that next GA, and during breakout we got the idea of initiating a Trainings working group. Our group was composed mainly of young activists who had cut their teeth at Bloombergville. They were enthusiastic about the idea of consensus process and direction action, but few has any real experience with either. Process at first was a shambles -- many participants didn't seem to understand that a block (that is, a veto--normally to be appealed to only as a last resort) was different than a "no" vote, and even facilitates, who were supposed to be running the meetings, tended to start each discussion of proposals not by asking if anyone had clarifying questions or concerns, but by simply saying, "Okay, that's the proposal. Any blocks?" Apart from trainings on democratic process, there was a shortage basic street skills: we needed to find people to provide legal trainings, if nothing else so everyone would know what to do if they were arrested, as some of us were definitely going to be, whether or not we decided to do anything illegal. We need more, still: medical training, to know what to do if someone next to them was injured and civil disobedience training...引自 MEETING
3 有用 代替你 2018-02-02
讀的是中文版《為什麼上街頭》因為衆所不知的原因無法在豆瓣開條目,書中講述當局如何瓦解佔領華爾街的手段,包括公然非禮女性參與者,無差別暴力攻擊,無原則隨機逮捕,利用黑幫份子襲擊參與者等等手段都似曾相識,想不到某政府居然向美帝學習。
0 有用 Chopin J.F.YU 2019-11-05
1)繁體中譯本,《為什麼上街頭?:新公民運動的歷史、危機和進程》;2)似乎持有任何立場的讀者都可以從中獲取自己需要的論據,尤其聯繫當下H城所發生的事情;3)以第三章為代表,闡述蠻多對資本主義、新自由主義與民主體制的批判與反思,但很顯然這樣的批判與站在我朝角度的批判,又不是一回事;4)當論述具體施行的情境時,在我看來很多推論都很勉強,而且作者「充滿話術」的寫作技巧,往往掩蓋了一些潛在的致命性問題。。... 1)繁體中譯本,《為什麼上街頭?:新公民運動的歷史、危機和進程》;2)似乎持有任何立場的讀者都可以從中獲取自己需要的論據,尤其聯繫當下H城所發生的事情;3)以第三章為代表,闡述蠻多對資本主義、新自由主義與民主體制的批判與反思,但很顯然這樣的批判與站在我朝角度的批判,又不是一回事;4)當論述具體施行的情境時,在我看來很多推論都很勉強,而且作者「充滿話術」的寫作技巧,往往掩蓋了一些潛在的致命性問題。。。 (展开)
0 有用 Maryjanesue 2013-11-21
书到还前看最快……
0 有用 何阿嵐 2019-09-06
只取一段。「令人奇怪的是,這種工具意然沒有更早就獲得驗證—它是絕佳的解決方法,可解決數千來人們有大型集會中想必一再遭到的問題(中略),這個技巧非常簡單。一人高聲講話,每說大約十幾個字就停頓一下,讓聽得見的人們複述剛才他們聽到的話,如此一來,所說的話可傳播到兩倍距離。這不僅實用而且會產生奇特,極具民主精神的效果。阻止了高談闊論,若你知道有一千個人都在等你說的每個字,每個人都懂得到避免不必要漫談,其次... 只取一段。「令人奇怪的是,這種工具意然沒有更早就獲得驗證—它是絕佳的解決方法,可解決數千來人們有大型集會中想必一再遭到的問題(中略),這個技巧非常簡單。一人高聲講話,每說大約十幾個字就停頓一下,讓聽得見的人們複述剛才他們聽到的話,如此一來,所說的話可傳播到兩倍距離。這不僅實用而且會產生奇特,極具民主精神的效果。阻止了高談闊論,若你知道有一千個人都在等你說的每個字,每個人都懂得到避免不必要漫談,其次,參與者不得不仔細傾聽別人說的話。」要如何實踐民主精神,還有漫長的路要學習。 (展开)
0 有用 小卫 2017-02-28
mark专门讲民主的第三章 http://www.newsocialist.org/760-the-democracy-project-a-review
0 有用 Chopin J.F.YU 2019-11-05
1)繁體中譯本,《為什麼上街頭?:新公民運動的歷史、危機和進程》;2)似乎持有任何立場的讀者都可以從中獲取自己需要的論據,尤其聯繫當下H城所發生的事情;3)以第三章為代表,闡述蠻多對資本主義、新自由主義與民主體制的批判與反思,但很顯然這樣的批判與站在我朝角度的批判,又不是一回事;4)當論述具體施行的情境時,在我看來很多推論都很勉強,而且作者「充滿話術」的寫作技巧,往往掩蓋了一些潛在的致命性問題。。... 1)繁體中譯本,《為什麼上街頭?:新公民運動的歷史、危機和進程》;2)似乎持有任何立場的讀者都可以從中獲取自己需要的論據,尤其聯繫當下H城所發生的事情;3)以第三章為代表,闡述蠻多對資本主義、新自由主義與民主體制的批判與反思,但很顯然這樣的批判與站在我朝角度的批判,又不是一回事;4)當論述具體施行的情境時,在我看來很多推論都很勉強,而且作者「充滿話術」的寫作技巧,往往掩蓋了一些潛在的致命性問題。。。 (展开)
0 有用 何阿嵐 2019-09-06
只取一段。「令人奇怪的是,這種工具意然沒有更早就獲得驗證—它是絕佳的解決方法,可解決數千來人們有大型集會中想必一再遭到的問題(中略),這個技巧非常簡單。一人高聲講話,每說大約十幾個字就停頓一下,讓聽得見的人們複述剛才他們聽到的話,如此一來,所說的話可傳播到兩倍距離。這不僅實用而且會產生奇特,極具民主精神的效果。阻止了高談闊論,若你知道有一千個人都在等你說的每個字,每個人都懂得到避免不必要漫談,其次... 只取一段。「令人奇怪的是,這種工具意然沒有更早就獲得驗證—它是絕佳的解決方法,可解決數千來人們有大型集會中想必一再遭到的問題(中略),這個技巧非常簡單。一人高聲講話,每說大約十幾個字就停頓一下,讓聽得見的人們複述剛才他們聽到的話,如此一來,所說的話可傳播到兩倍距離。這不僅實用而且會產生奇特,極具民主精神的效果。阻止了高談闊論,若你知道有一千個人都在等你說的每個字,每個人都懂得到避免不必要漫談,其次,參與者不得不仔細傾聽別人說的話。」要如何實踐民主精神,還有漫長的路要學習。 (展开)
3 有用 代替你 2018-02-02
讀的是中文版《為什麼上街頭》因為衆所不知的原因無法在豆瓣開條目,書中講述當局如何瓦解佔領華爾街的手段,包括公然非禮女性參與者,無差別暴力攻擊,無原則隨機逮捕,利用黑幫份子襲擊參與者等等手段都似曾相識,想不到某政府居然向美帝學習。
0 有用 小卫 2017-02-28
mark专门讲民主的第三章 http://www.newsocialist.org/760-the-democracy-project-a-review
0 有用 Maryjanesue 2013-11-21
书到还前看最快……