Historians have traditionally used the discourses of free trade and laissez faire to explain the development of political economy during the Enlightenment. But from Sophus Reinert’s perspective, eighteenth-century political economy can be understood only in the context of the often brutal imperial rivalries then unfolding in Europe and its former colonies and the positive consequences of active economic policy. The idea of economic emulation was the prism through which philosophers, ministers, reformers, and even merchants thought about economics, as well as industrial policy and reform, in the early modern period. With the rise of the British Empire, European powers and others sought to selectively emulate the British model.
In mapping the general history of economic translations between 1500 and 1849, and particularly tracing the successive translations of the Bristol merchant John Cary’s seminal 1695 Essay on the State of England, Reinert makes a compelling case for the way that England’s aggressively nationalist policies, especially extensive tariffs and other intrusive market interventions, were adopted in France, Italy, Germany, and Scandinavia before providing the blueprint for independence in the New World. Relatively forgotten today, Cary’s work served as the basis for an international move toward using political economy as the prime tool of policymaking and industrial expansion.
Reinert’s work challenges previous narratives about the origins of political economy and invites the current generation of economists to reexamine the foundations, and future, of their discipline.
Awards
2012, Winner of the Joseph J. Spengler Best Book Prize
2012, Winner of the George L. Mosse Prize
3 有用 韦衡 2024-04-19 01:19:56 江苏
补标,History of Political Economy/Intellectual History补课。当我们在讨论“文本的旅行(翻译、传播与接受)”时,Reinert提供了一个此类题材的典范式写作。他的中心观点并不算最为新颖的:18世纪的政治经济学并非physiocrats与Adam Smith作为代表的“doctrines of free trade”,而是激烈的国际竞争之下的state... 补标,History of Political Economy/Intellectual History补课。当我们在讨论“文本的旅行(翻译、传播与接受)”时,Reinert提供了一个此类题材的典范式写作。他的中心观点并不算最为新颖的:18世纪的政治经济学并非physiocrats与Adam Smith作为代表的“doctrines of free trade”,而是激烈的国际竞争之下的state- interventionist approach,正因如此,在当时作为学科的政治经济学也同样与power、coercion 有关(Pincus的1688: The First Modern Revolution与Neither Machiavellian Moment nor [1/n] (展开)
0 有用 拉马克与达尔文 2024-06-28 18:35:54 北京
2012年美国历史学会乔治·莫斯奖得主 2012年美国与国际经济学史学会约瑟夫 J.斯宾格勒奖得主 断断续续读了几次,算是读过本书前言、第1章(理论部分)与结语。作者的意图比较清楚了。这本书的主题其实就是对一本书在欧洲的翻译史的梳理。哈佛的人写东西太文邹邹。