In this groundbreaking book, renowned art historian Hans Belting proposes a new anthropological theory for interpreting human picture making. Rather than focus exclusively on pictures as they are embodied in various media such as painting, sculpture, or photography, he links pictures to our mental images and therefore our bodies. The body is understood as a "living medium" that produces, perceives, or remembers images that are different from the images we encounter through handmade or technical pictures. Refusing to reduce images to their material embodiment yet acknowledging the importance of the historical media in which images are manifested, "An Anthropology of Images" presents a challenging and provocative new account of what pictures are and how they function. The book demonstrates these ideas with a series of compelling case studies, ranging from Dante's picture theory to post-photography. One chapter explores the tension between image and medium in two "media of the body", the coat of arms and the portrait painting. Another, central chapter looks at the relationship between image and death, tracing picture production, including the first use of the mask, to early funerary rituals in which pictures served to represent the missing bodies of the dead. Pictures were tools to re-embody the deceased, to make them present again, a fact that offers a surprising clue to the riddle of presence and absence in most pictures and that reveals a genealogy of pictures obscured by Platonic picture theory.
0 有用 6ans 2023-07-02 16:55:20 湖北
final project忘记标 很ambitious的framework但是有疏漏 特别是对于photography 就算是德语翻译来 belting还是很poetic
0 有用 未来主义修会® 2022-06-08 11:56:52
讲不清的,评论区都是各取所忆。有空还是得大概翻译翻。顶多与贝尔廷产生点情绪上的共鸣,亦即一种作为提供缺席与空洞之经验的图像的逝去,这种经验在技术化认知与虚拟影像之前的过去是与死亡及身体相关。前现代之后,柏拉图对前古典希腊的葬仪图像的内质的批判得到复兴,图像不再是死亡的身体的转替,也不再被赋予再社会化的潜能。制图在人类学的意义上即是对抗被空缺所扰乱的秩序,一种形而上的转变使观者与图像之间形成象征交换... 讲不清的,评论区都是各取所忆。有空还是得大概翻译翻。顶多与贝尔廷产生点情绪上的共鸣,亦即一种作为提供缺席与空洞之经验的图像的逝去,这种经验在技术化认知与虚拟影像之前的过去是与死亡及身体相关。前现代之后,柏拉图对前古典希腊的葬仪图像的内质的批判得到复兴,图像不再是死亡的身体的转替,也不再被赋予再社会化的潜能。制图在人类学的意义上即是对抗被空缺所扰乱的秩序,一种形而上的转变使观者与图像之间形成象征交换的关系。图像是沉默的,是指向死亡与身体的非在场,这从根本上相异于现代人对无需身体的影像世界的偏爱。 (展开)
11 有用 𝑾𝒂𝒍𝒅𝒆𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒂𝒎𝒌𝒆𝒊𝒕 2022-08-10 14:31:24
建议转战贝尔廷的文章Image, Medium, Body: A New Approach to Iconology,比直接读这本书更有效。原因不仅在于文章是书的简写版,而且在于文章是贝尔廷自己用英文写的,而书是从德文转译过来的。连贝尔廷自己都抱怨英译本不够好,或者说他所使用的术语本来就是不可译的。比如,英语里picture和image在德语里都是Bild,而Bild的语义模糊性恰恰符合贝尔廷的设... 建议转战贝尔廷的文章Image, Medium, Body: A New Approach to Iconology,比直接读这本书更有效。原因不仅在于文章是书的简写版,而且在于文章是贝尔廷自己用英文写的,而书是从德文转译过来的。连贝尔廷自己都抱怨英译本不够好,或者说他所使用的术语本来就是不可译的。比如,英语里picture和image在德语里都是Bild,而Bild的语义模糊性恰恰符合贝尔廷的设想:精神图像与物理制品是一体两面的。我很好奇,为什么贝尔廷在文中提了那么多次“图像(image)–媒介–身体”的三位一体,结果英译本的副标题却是“图画(picture)–媒介–身体”?如果按照贝尔廷的定义,“图画”是有“媒介”的“图像”,那么将“图画”与“媒介”放到同一层级的做法显然是有问题的。 (展开)
0 有用 一颗糖 2020-08-08 12:10:20
我生命里的很多事都解开了。观赏画作-ontological difference-death,现在的image已经沦为empirical image,而不是transcendental image. 。在一百三十几页,他规整克制的文笔写下:There is no way out. 我感受到了他的伤感。
1 有用 L 2020-01-09 04:33:55
强调image和picture之间的区隔:前者可以被包括人身体(具有perception和memory功能)在内的媒介物质化为后者,而媒介在此过程中也被激活。对于思考新旧媒介关系、处理intermediality比较有启发。比起一个好的理论家可能更是一个好的艺评人。