Their movement was absolutely necessary, with a necessity which cannot be judged by any other tribunal. The privilege of the phoné does not depend upon a choice that could have been avoided. It responds to a moment of economy (let us say of the "life" of "history" or of "being as self-relationship" ). The system of "hearing (understanding)-oneself-speak" through the phonic substance—which presents itself as the nonexterior, nonmundane, therefore nonempirical or noncontingent signifier—has necessarily dominated the history of the world during an entire epoch, and has even produced the idea of the world, the idea of world-origin, that arises from the difference between the worldly and the non-wordly, the outside and the inside, ideality and nonideality, universal and nonuniversal, transcende... (查看原文)
序言 中译："字母产生前的文字", p1 原文："L'Ecriture avant le lettre", <<avertissement>> 英译：“Writing before the Letter", p.lxxxiv. 比较：ecriture译成”书写“较好，不是特指文字。 第一章 中译：“暴露出词汇的龌龊”,p7 原文：“dénonce la lâcheté du vo...
(展开)
Comparing Barthes, who particularly stresses the writerly text and its nonlinearity, Jacques Derrida emphasizes ‘textual openness, intertextuality, and the irrelevance of distinctions between inside and outside a particular text’ (Landow, 1997: 33). For D...
(展开)
春深
Johns Hopkins University Press1998版
1 有用 焦糖馆馆 2015-06-27
真会玩
0 有用 蝉 2014-02-27
: H02/2263-1
0 有用 [已注销] 2013-12-24
合家欢还是可以看看啦
0 有用 Hushnore 2011-11-27
据说有误译，我不知。
0 有用 遥 2011-05-27
看不懂*&@#XX%￥？？
0 有用 Xedtonishe 2020-06-05
书写不会在场，就像“无”不会在场，它们是缄默的。 理性中心主义和语音中心主义是建构着的阳具，“无”不出场也不发声，但它悄然解构着一切，因为它是创生无的无，创生神秘的神秘，这就是人文精神。
0 有用 青骓 2020-05-25
第一部分的分析实在妙绝。翻译差可。
0 有用 巴山精 2020-05-21
我太年轻当时看晕了
0 有用 枫林翠景 2020-05-11
书的内容是经典的，但是我对汪老师的翻译有所保留。题目的翻译首先就有问题。
0 有用 张尘 2019-12-17
翻译问题挺大，书还是不错的