The Milgram experiment was a series of seminal social psychology experiments conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram, which measured the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience. Milgram first described his research in 1963 in an article published in the Jou...
The Milgram experiment was a series of seminal social psychology experiments conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram, which measured the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience. Milgram first described his research in 1963 in an article published in the Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,and later discussed his findings in greater depth in his 1974 book, Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View.
The experiments began in July 1961, three months after the start of the trial of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem. Milgram devised the experiments to answer this question: "Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?"
作者简介
· · · · · ·
Dr. Stanley Milgram (August 15, 1933 – December 20, 1984) was a social psychologist at Yale University, Harvard University and the City University of New York. While at Harvard, he conducted the small-world experiment (the source of the six degrees of separation concept), and while at Yale, he conducted the Milgram experiment on obedience to authority. He also introduced the co...
Dr. Stanley Milgram (August 15, 1933 – December 20, 1984) was a social psychologist at Yale University, Harvard University and the City University of New York. While at Harvard, he conducted the small-world experiment (the source of the six degrees of separation concept), and while at Yale, he conducted the Milgram experiment on obedience to authority. He also introduced the concept of familiar strangers.
Can human nature be changed in such a way that man will forget his longing for freedom, for dignity, for integrity, for love—that is to say, can man forget he is human? Or does human nature have a dyn...Can human nature be changed in such a way that man will forget his longing for freedom, for dignity, for integrity, for love—that is to say, can man forget he is human? Or does human nature have a dynamism which will react to the violation of these basic human needs by attempting to change an inhuman society into a human one? (展开)
活幻の廢物
新华出版社2013版
Tigris
新华出版社2013版
男秘
新华出版社2015版
乡村土狼
新华出版社2015版
2 有用 长亭 2014-03-30 12:37:10
第一次一天读完一本英文书，也是读过最负能量的一本书。我个人更倾向于服从是个人道德感中的个体层面让步于集体层面的一个例子。从进化的观念讲，这种群体道德感也是有利于群体延续的。下一步应该思考的是权威的服从者应该承担多少责任？另外，我不太认同作者的实验伦理。他认为这种情感压力是被者的个人选择的结果，而我认为这种压力恰恰在于被试者需要做出选择本身。真是既无beneficiary也无consentment。
1 有用 丸子焦躁了 2010-01-27 07:19:45
執手相看淚眼。
0 有用 Coraggiosa 2020-08-20 23:04:57
所以也不用说xx人不行了，奴性深植于人性，只有靠inconvenient political-philosophical education不断刺激才能做好现代人。
0 有用 怪味胡豆 2019-12-19 12:55:43
Coursera的social phychology里面看到的
0 有用 ISOlation 2019-10-15 02:08:46
令人沮丧的事实。
0 有用 Coraggiosa 2020-08-20 23:04:57
所以也不用说xx人不行了，奴性深植于人性，只有靠inconvenient political-philosophical education不断刺激才能做好现代人。
0 有用 怪味胡豆 2019-12-19 12:55:43
Coursera的social phychology里面看到的
0 有用 ISOlation 2019-10-15 02:08:46
令人沮丧的事实。
1 有用 筱叮当 2018-03-07 00:08:59
Can human nature be changed in such a way that man will forget his longing for freedom, for dignity, for integrity, for love—that is to say, can man forget he is human? Or does human nature have a dyn... Can human nature be changed in such a way that man will forget his longing for freedom, for dignity, for integrity, for love—that is to say, can man forget he is human? Or does human nature have a dynamism which will react to the violation of these basic human needs by attempting to change an inhuman society into a human one? (展开)
0 有用 Fedrick 2016-05-13 16:03:34
很赞的书，讲了很多深刻影响社会的潜在心理机制