作者:
Kevin Passmore 出版社: Oxford University Press, USA 副标题: A Very Short Introduction 出版年: 2002-11-28 页数: 176 定价: USD 11.95 装帧: Paperback 丛书:Very Short Introductions ISBN: 9780192801555
What is fascism? Is it revolutionary? Or is it reactionary? This book argues that it is both: fascism unleashes violence against the left and ethnic minorities, but also condemns the bourgeoisie for its 'softness'. Kevin Passmore opens his book with a series of 'scenes from fascist life' - a secret meeting of the Romanian Iron Guard; Mussolini meeting the king of Italy; a rally...
What is fascism? Is it revolutionary? Or is it reactionary? This book argues that it is both: fascism unleashes violence against the left and ethnic minorities, but also condemns the bourgeoisie for its 'softness'. Kevin Passmore opens his book with a series of 'scenes from fascist life' - a secret meeting of the Romanian Iron Guard; Mussolini meeting the king of Italy; a rally of Hungarian doctors calling for restrictions on the number of Jews entering the profession; the shooting of 1800 Jews by Reserve Police Battalion 101 at Jozefow in Poland in July 1942. He then looks at the paradoxes of fascism through its origins in the political and social crisis of the late nineteenth century, the history of fascist movements and regimes in Italy and Germany, and the fortunes of 'failed' fascist movements in Romania, Hungary and Spain. He shows how fascism used and uses propaganda and popular culture to propagate itself and how it exported its ideas outside Europe, through Nazi and Spanish post-war escape routes to Latin America, for instance. The book concludes with a discussion of the recent revival of the extreme right in Austria, Italy, France, and Russia.
Quite rightly, readers might ask what is the point of this book if it can't provide a once-and-for-all definition that enables them to recognize and understand fascism. If readers bear with me, I hope to show that our inablitiy to pin fascism down does not mean that we can't say anything at all, or that it's all just a matter of opinion. Scepticism towards definitions does not mean that we can do without them together. To begin with, readers rightly expect me to tell them what I shall include in the book, but they must remember that what I include is a choice, and that I could have chosen differently. Thus, I cover movements and regimes that called themselves fascist or were called fascist by their enemies or by shcolars. I made that choice because I suspect that readers will be interested... (查看原文)
Academics are better equipped to explore the systems of political labelling that pertain in particular circumstances, how labels were used, and what they meant to protagonists. In that sense, the concept of fascism is essential to understanding the past: while we may be aware of the impossibility of defining fascism, protagonists believed that the concept was very real, and what they thought fascism was shaped their views and they ways groups responded to each other. So rather than engage in the fruitless debate about whether Nazism was a form of fascism, we may explore the ways in which Nazis used the label or rejected it, how they interpreted the Italian regime, what they took from it, and how they combined their borrowings from Fascism with other ideas and practice. (查看原文)
2014版~一开始，作者解释了无法定义fascism，因为它既是A又不是A，但是无法定义不代表不可以讨论，然后他说 “To begin with, readers rightly expect me to tell them what I shall include in the book, but they must remember that what I include is a choic...2014版~一开始，作者解释了无法定义fascism，因为它既是A又不是A，但是无法定义不代表不可以讨论，然后他说 “To begin with, readers rightly expect me to tell them what I shall include in the book, but they must remember that what I include is a choice, and that I could have chosen differently. ” 这样的“摊牌”点亮了一本小书。(展开)
1 有用 一个劳动人民 2011-03-11 14:42:41
看完之后，我觉得，即使在今天，法西斯主义仍然充满诱惑力
0 有用 艾習角™ 2012-07-23 14:57:11
翻过。只看了缘起。
1 有用 Jeanne d'Hsiu 2024-01-14 22:18:41 福建
法西斯简单而言，就是民族与国家高于一切，国家深入一切。社会主义的阶级斗争削弱国家，那就必须镇压，但这并不代表资本主义可以大行其道，相反，资本也必须受国家节制，宗教力量女性力量也是如此，既是极左，也是极右，既反左，也反右。
0 有用 Fay 2022-06-27 20:30:44
2014版~一开始，作者解释了无法定义fascism，因为它既是A又不是A，但是无法定义不代表不可以讨论，然后他说 “To begin with, readers rightly expect me to tell them what I shall include in the book, but they must remember that what I include is a choic... 2014版~一开始，作者解释了无法定义fascism，因为它既是A又不是A，但是无法定义不代表不可以讨论，然后他说 “To begin with, readers rightly expect me to tell them what I shall include in the book, but they must remember that what I include is a choice, and that I could have chosen differently. ” 这样的“摊牌”点亮了一本小书。 (展开)
0 有用 废梁 2015-09-16 07:49:55
读书要戒骄戒躁，在此之前要选对书