The ‘should be’ kills life, and an epic hero constructed out of what ‘should be’ will always be but a shadow of the living epic man of historical reality, his shadow but never his original image, and his given world of experience and adventure can only be a watered-down copy of reality, never its core and essence. Utopian stylisation of the epic inevitably creates distance, but such distance lies between two instances of the empirical, so that the sorrow and majesty created by this distance can only make for a rhetorical tone. This distance may produce marvellous elegiac lyricism, but it can never, in itself, put real life into a content that transcends being, or turns such content into self-sufficient reality. (查看原文)
0 有用 南池子 2011-11-24 15:13:34
像诗歌一样的文学批评。
0 有用 林檎 2012-09-07 09:52:42
翻譯和編輯的漏洞太明顯
0 有用 张不三 2012-02-10 09:13:38
相当华丽,相当抽象
0 有用 艾吉奥 2018-08-09 17:44:06
他读他之前的小说。注意时间分界。