In this new book, Slavoj Žižek and Glyn Daly engage in a series of entertaining conversations which illustrate the originality of Žižek’s thinking on psychoanalysis, philosophy, multiculturalism, popular/cyber culture, totalitarianism, ethics and politics.
An excellent introduction to one of the most engaging and controversial cultural theorists writing today.
In this new book, Slavoj Žižek and Glyn Daly engage in a series of entertaining conversations which illustrate the originality of Žižek’s thinking on psychoanalysis, philosophy, multiculturalism, popular/cyber culture, totalitarianism, ethics and politics.
An excellent introduction to one of the most engaging and controversial cultural theorists writing today.
Žižek is a Slovenian sociologist who trained as a Lacanian and uses Lacan to analyse popular culture and politics.
Illustrates the originality of Žižek’s thinking on psychoanalysis, philosophy, multi-culturalism, popular/cyber culture, totalitarianism, ethics and politics.
Provides a unique glimpse of Žižek’s humour and character and offers new material and fresh perspectives which will be of interest to followers of Žižek’s writings.
The true formula of materialism is not that there is some noumenal reality beyond our distorting perception of it. The only consistent materialist position is that the world does not exist - in the Kantian sense of the term, as a self-enclosed whole. The notion of the world as a positive universe presupposes an external observer, an observer not caught in it. The very position from which you can perceive the world as a self-enclosed whole is the position of an external observer. It is thus paradoxically this radical perspectivism which allows us to formulate a truly materialist position, not that the world exists outside our mind, but that our mind does not exist outside the world. Lenin put the accent on the wrong point. The problem of materialism is not 'does reality exist outside?' The ... (查看原文)
Split within object, deconstructionism as open towards otherness, death drive, object of desire and the object cause of desire, sexual difference, Kant and Sade (both as absolute autonomy, as against ...Split within object, deconstructionism as open towards otherness, death drive, object of desire and the object cause of desire, sexual difference, Kant and Sade (both as absolute autonomy, as against utilitarianism), two deleuzes, cognitivism (how to explain the surplus of consciousness), event and the paradox of autopoeisis, impossible as real(展开)
1/聊他怎么跟“斯共”打交道的部分是最有趣的。2/很想知道失业那四年（还带一个孩子）他在想什么。3/套用马基雅维利的话：深刻认识意识形态的性质的应该是那些对意识形态毫不在乎的人；同样，深刻认识那些人的性质的应该是意识形态专家（真正的专家似乎应该研究那些人“本身”）。4/符号实践理论的部分，就我读懂的部分，看起来像是老马44手稿里这句话的长注释：“一个人认识到自己在法、政治等等中过着外化生活的人，就...1/聊他怎么跟“斯共”打交道的部分是最有趣的。2/很想知道失业那四年（还带一个孩子）他在想什么。3/套用马基雅维利的话：深刻认识意识形态的性质的应该是那些对意识形态毫不在乎的人；同样，深刻认识那些人的性质的应该是意识形态专家（真正的专家似乎应该研究那些人“本身”）。4/符号实践理论的部分，就我读懂的部分，看起来像是老马44手稿里这句话的长注释：“一个人认识到自己在法、政治等等中过着外化生活的人，就是在这种外化生活本身中过着自己的真正的人的生活。因此，与自身相矛盾的，既与知识又与对象的本质相矛盾的自我肯定、自我确证，是真正的知识和真正的生活。”这解释了为什么不可能的the Real一直在发生，但它极端的创伤性内核让我们很难对它说yes I said yes I will yes(展开)
![[斯洛文尼亚] 斯拉沃热·齐泽克](https://img9.doubanio.com/img/author/medium/public/1494572431.36.jpg)
斯拉沃热·齐泽克 作者
碎步湖上
江苏人民出版社2005版
2 有用 フ 2015-01-03 04:42:21
Split within object, deconstructionism as open towards otherness, death drive, object of desire and the object cause of desire, sexual difference, Kant and Sade (both as absolute autonomy, as against ... Split within object, deconstructionism as open towards otherness, death drive, object of desire and the object cause of desire, sexual difference, Kant and Sade (both as absolute autonomy, as against utilitarianism), two deleuzes, cognitivism (how to explain the surplus of consciousness), event and the paradox of autopoeisis, impossible as real (展开)
0 有用 离净语 2015-07-20 17:57:25
确实比著作要易懂……
0 有用 想本雅明迟了迟 2020-07-29 03:59:13
make a decision and act!
0 有用 郭若若 2012-05-14 22:34:33
oh my god this guy is so interesting!
0 有用 Agilulfo 2024-02-23 23:00:59 上海
1/聊他怎么跟“斯共”打交道的部分是最有趣的。2/很想知道失业那四年（还带一个孩子）他在想什么。3/套用马基雅维利的话：深刻认识意识形态的性质的应该是那些对意识形态毫不在乎的人；同样，深刻认识那些人的性质的应该是意识形态专家（真正的专家似乎应该研究那些人“本身”）。4/符号实践理论的部分，就我读懂的部分，看起来像是老马44手稿里这句话的长注释：“一个人认识到自己在法、政治等等中过着外化生活的人，就... 1/聊他怎么跟“斯共”打交道的部分是最有趣的。2/很想知道失业那四年（还带一个孩子）他在想什么。3/套用马基雅维利的话：深刻认识意识形态的性质的应该是那些对意识形态毫不在乎的人；同样，深刻认识那些人的性质的应该是意识形态专家（真正的专家似乎应该研究那些人“本身”）。4/符号实践理论的部分，就我读懂的部分，看起来像是老马44手稿里这句话的长注释：“一个人认识到自己在法、政治等等中过着外化生活的人，就是在这种外化生活本身中过着自己的真正的人的生活。因此，与自身相矛盾的，既与知识又与对象的本质相矛盾的自我肯定、自我确证，是真正的知识和真正的生活。”这解释了为什么不可能的the Real一直在发生，但它极端的创伤性内核让我们很难对它说yes I said yes I will yes (展开)