作者:
Richard Rorty 出版社: Harvard University Press 副标题: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America 出版年: 1999-9-1 页数: 176 定价: USD 23.50 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780674003125
The author argues that the Left wing in America sees the sins of America's past poisoning hope for the future, and challenges the "lost" generation of the Left to understand the role it might play in the tradition of democratic intellectual labour that started with writers like Walt Whitman and John Dewey. The book traces the source of the debilitating mentality of shame in the...
The author argues that the Left wing in America sees the sins of America's past poisoning hope for the future, and challenges the "lost" generation of the Left to understand the role it might play in the tradition of democratic intellectual labour that started with writers like Walt Whitman and John Dewey. The book traces the source of the debilitating mentality of shame in the Left of how national pride and American patriotism come to seem an endorsement of atrocites - from slavery to the slaughter of Native Americans, from the felling of ancient forests to the Vietnam War. At the centre of this history is the conflict between the Old Left and the New that arose during the Vietnam War era. The author describes how the paradoxical victory of the antiwar movement, ushering in the Nixon years, encouraged a disillusioned generation of intellectuals to pursue "High Theory" at the expense of considering the place of ideas in our common life. He sees a retreat from secularism and pragmatism, and decries the tendency of the heirs of the New Left to theorize about the United States from a distance instead of participating in the civic work of shaping our national future. Richard Rorty looks to redress the imbalance in American cultural life by rallying those on the Left to the civic engagement and inspiration needed for "achieving our country".
Richard Rorty (1931–2007) authored several landmark books and essay collections, including Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature; The Consequences of Pragmatism; Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity; and Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America. He taught at Wellesley College, Princeton University, the University of Virginia, and Stanford University.
目录
· · · · · ·
American National Pride: Whitman and Dewey
The Eclipse of the Reformist Left
A Cultural Left
Appendixes
Movements and Campaigns
The Inspirational Value of Great Works of Literature
· · · · · ·
(更多)
American National Pride: Whitman and Dewey
The Eclipse of the Reformist Left
A Cultural Left
Appendixes
Movements and Campaigns
The Inspirational Value of Great Works of Literature
Notes
Acknowledgments
Index
· · · · · · (收起)
不仅仅在于罗蒂在那一段话里是否作出了某个惊人的预言,而在于那种对六十年代转型后美国左翼的督促乃至苛责放在今天格外有意义。回到一种建立在American Exceptionalism之上的liberal/humanistic national pride也许不是唯一最佳的出路,但新一代的左翼确实必须从安于用抽象的“意识形态”或“权力”揭穿社会政治结构的本质而不去参与、发动、辩论具体的政治经济政策的现...不仅仅在于罗蒂在那一段话里是否作出了某个惊人的预言,而在于那种对六十年代转型后美国左翼的督促乃至苛责放在今天格外有意义。回到一种建立在American Exceptionalism之上的liberal/humanistic national pride也许不是唯一最佳的出路,但新一代的左翼确实必须从安于用抽象的“意识形态”或“权力”揭穿社会政治结构的本质而不去参与、发动、辩论具体的政治经济政策的现状中走出来了。(展开)
3 有用 Manchild 2013-01-05 10:46:39
国家如同个人,没有稳固的先验本质。国家也在尼采的"self-making"过程中,罗蒂在非马克思的传统里整理美国的左翼传统,评判文化左翼和改良左翼在改善国家的实际效果。最后还是回到学科范畴,摈弃Jameson的抽象旁观者似的姿态。[不少观点其实都有待商榷,行文风格如同先知]
4 有用 Rilkelee 2017-01-29 14:12:15
不仅仅在于罗蒂在那一段话里是否作出了某个惊人的预言,而在于那种对六十年代转型后美国左翼的督促乃至苛责放在今天格外有意义。回到一种建立在American Exceptionalism之上的liberal/humanistic national pride也许不是唯一最佳的出路,但新一代的左翼确实必须从安于用抽象的“意识形态”或“权力”揭穿社会政治结构的本质而不去参与、发动、辩论具体的政治经济政策的现... 不仅仅在于罗蒂在那一段话里是否作出了某个惊人的预言,而在于那种对六十年代转型后美国左翼的督促乃至苛责放在今天格外有意义。回到一种建立在American Exceptionalism之上的liberal/humanistic national pride也许不是唯一最佳的出路,但新一代的左翼确实必须从安于用抽象的“意识形态”或“权力”揭穿社会政治结构的本质而不去参与、发动、辩论具体的政治经济政策的现状中走出来了。 (展开)
0 有用 鄙德 2022-04-06 06:45:56
1.罗蒂对马克思的误读下,他批判的其实是被吸纳到列宁和斯大林主义中的orthedox Marxism。2.罗蒂强调一种不同于马克思主义者的,改良主义的旧左派在这个不平等逐渐扩大的全球化时代之必要,因而辛辣地批评了美国六十年代兴起的新左派/文化左派,甚至直言cultural politics不是真正的politics。虽然明显有拉偏架之嫌,但罗蒂的目标是明确的,即找回参与以及能改变社会现状的左翼。3... 1.罗蒂对马克思的误读下,他批判的其实是被吸纳到列宁和斯大林主义中的orthedox Marxism。2.罗蒂强调一种不同于马克思主义者的,改良主义的旧左派在这个不平等逐渐扩大的全球化时代之必要,因而辛辣地批评了美国六十年代兴起的新左派/文化左派,甚至直言cultural politics不是真正的politics。虽然明显有拉偏架之嫌,但罗蒂的目标是明确的,即找回参与以及能改变社会现状的左翼。3.结尾部分,通过对新自由主义和全球化的一瞥,罗蒂在上世纪末对右翼民粹主义做出了令人惊讶的准确预言。 (展开)
1 有用 暮色·朝阳 2020-07-23 10:16:30
The leftist thinker I like! 每个段落都很精辟,不愧是大哲学家。第三章里对近几十年兴起的文化左派和身份政治的批判,尤其是对美国政治衰败的神预测,在2016年大选后还在网上被热议了一阵子。
0 有用 木其水 2017-12-09 20:01:25
罗蒂是个好老师