On Feminine Sexuality, the Limits of Love and Knowledge

原文摘录   · · · · · · 

• What is jouissance? Here it amounts to no more than a negative instance (instance). Jouissance is what serves no purpose (ne sert à rien). I am pointing here to the reservation implied by the field of the right-to-jouissance. Right (droit) is not duty. Nothing forces anyone to enjoy (jouir) except the superego. The superego is the imperative of jouissance - Enjoy! p 2 Thus, I am leaving you to your own devices on this bed. I am going out, and once again I will write on the door so that, as you exit, you may perhaps recall the dreams you will have pursued on this bed. I will write the following sentence: "Jouissance of the Other," of the Other with a capital O, "of the body of the Other who symbolizes the Other, is not the sign of love." p 3 Then what is involved in love? Is love - as p... (查看原文)

  ! 1赞 2013-07-14 14:15:31

• Stated otherwise, I reduce the hypothesis, according to the very formulation that lends it substance, to the following: it is necessary to the functioning of llanguage. To say that there is a subject is nothing other than to say that there is a hypothesis. The only proof we have that the subject coincides with this hypothesis, and that it is the speaking individual on whom it is based, is that the signifier becomes a sign. It is because there is the unconscious - namely, llanguage, insofar as it is on the basis of the cohabitation with llanguage that a being known as speaking being is defined - that the signifier can be called upon to constitute a sign (faire signe). The signifier is a subject's sign. Qua formal medium (support), the signifier hits something other (atteint un autre) tha... (查看原文)

  ! 2013-07-14 14:22:04