出版社: Harvard University Press
出版年: 1980-7-26
页数: 192
定价: USD 25.00
装帧: Paperback
ISBN: 9780674598461
内容简介 · · · · · ·
If there is such a thing as essential reading in metaphysics or in philosophy of language, this is it.
Ever since the publication of its original version, Naming and Necessity has had great and increasing influence. It redirected philosophical attention to neglected questions of natural and metaphysical necessity and to the connections between these and theories of referenc...
If there is such a thing as essential reading in metaphysics or in philosophy of language, this is it.
Ever since the publication of its original version, Naming and Necessity has had great and increasing influence. It redirected philosophical attention to neglected questions of natural and metaphysical necessity and to the connections between these and theories of reference, in particular of naming, and of identity. From a critique of the dominant tendency to assimilate names to descriptions and more generally to treat their reference as a function of their Fregean sense, surprisingly deep and widespread consequences may be drawn. The largely discredited distinction between accidental and essential properties, both of individual things (including people) and of kinds of things, is revived. So is a consequent view of science as what seeks out the essences of natural kinds. Traditional objections to such views are dealt with by sharpening distinctions between epistemic and metaphysical necessity; in particular by the startling admission of necessary a posteriori truths. From these, in particular from identity statements using rigid designators whether of things or of kinds, further remarkable consequences are drawn for the natures of things, of people, and of kinds; strong objections follow, for example to identity versions of materialism as a theory of the mind.
This seminal work, to which today's thriving essentialist metaphysics largely owes its impetus, is here published with a substantial new Preface by the author.
作者简介 · · · · · ·
Saul Aaron Kripke is an American philosopher and logician now emeritus from Princeton and professor of philosophy at CUNY Graduate Center. He has been immensely influential in a number of fields related to logic and philosophy of language. Much of his work remains unpublished or exists only as tape-recordings and privately circulated manuscripts. He is nonetheless widely regard...
Saul Aaron Kripke is an American philosopher and logician now emeritus from Princeton and professor of philosophy at CUNY Graduate Center. He has been immensely influential in a number of fields related to logic and philosophy of language. Much of his work remains unpublished or exists only as tape-recordings and privately circulated manuscripts. He is nonetheless widely regarded as the foremost philosopher of the turn of the millenium, and was the winner of the 2001 Schock Prize in Logic and Philosophy.
原文摘录 · · · · · ·
喜欢读"Naming and Necessity"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·
Naming and Necessity的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 18 条 )
克里普克反驳物理主义的论证
叶闯:克里普克指称理论的语用学论证
【转】洪汉鼎:克里普克的命名和必然性理论
十一月廿七(十二月一日)
Strongart教授:洛必达法则与火烧赤壁
> 更多书评 18篇
论坛 · · · · · ·
在这本书的论坛里发言这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部8 )
-
上海译文出版社 (2005)8.4分 251人读过
-
上海译文出版社 (2001)8.2分 73人读过
-
上海译文出版社 (2016)8.9分 55人读过
-
Wiley-Blackwell (1981)9.3分 53人读过
以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )
- 到手哲学外文读物 (切)
- Saul Kripke (当且仅当)
- MIT Linguistics and Philosophy (恩布勒姆)
- 语言学是一个学科群 (NADPH)
- 专名的摹状词理论 (当且仅当)
谁读这本书? · · · · · ·
二手市场
· · · · · ·
- 在豆瓣转让 有356人想读,手里有一本闲着?
订阅关于Naming and Necessity的评论:
feed: rss 2.0
0 有用 水晶糯米大食怪 2022-09-27 12:49:07 美国
恨你
0 有用 不必再见了 2011-01-10 19:29:19
http://socialistica.lenin.ru/analytic/txt/k/kripke_1.htm
0 有用 Q 2011-12-21 21:56:00
Rereading Kripke's groundbreaking classic now. I'd say very "Platonic"
0 有用 安左 2016-10-06 06:14:06
其实我觉得即便是empirical investigation的结果也是有historical and social的成分的吧。始终没有办法完全接受rigid designator的设定。但是第三讲扯到身心问题是个蛮不错的动作,虽然基于前面并没有很说服我所以从结果上讲并不是那么满意。但above all these,“迄今为止能够做到的最好”也确实是实证科学的一个特点,从这个角度上讲这本书还是给出... 其实我觉得即便是empirical investigation的结果也是有historical and social的成分的吧。始终没有办法完全接受rigid designator的设定。但是第三讲扯到身心问题是个蛮不错的动作,虽然基于前面并没有很说服我所以从结果上讲并不是那么满意。但above all these,“迄今为止能够做到的最好”也确实是实证科学的一个特点,从这个角度上讲这本书还是给出了一个很不错的方向。 (展开)
0 有用 一味愚 2011-12-30 21:12:22
这本书有时间一定要好好读。
0 有用 项平 2023-09-16 18:10:50 甘肃
可能我关于transworld identification的直觉都是从起点网文来的……
0 有用 水晶糯米大食怪 2022-09-27 12:49:07 美国
恨你
0 有用 Mockingbird 2022-07-04 23:58:09
大体来说,命名理论或者名称理论能够被视作20世纪分析哲学或者语言哲学的一个主要方面,各方探讨的焦点可以被总结为这样一个设问:一个名称的实质为何?Kripke的论证基本分成“破”和“立”两部分。就驳论环节来说,首当其冲的是以Frege和Russel为发端的描述语理论,即,一个名称的实质在于它能够被还原为一系列的描述语,后者相应构成了名称之意义的语义来源。Late Wittgenstein和Searl... 大体来说,命名理论或者名称理论能够被视作20世纪分析哲学或者语言哲学的一个主要方面,各方探讨的焦点可以被总结为这样一个设问:一个名称的实质为何?Kripke的论证基本分成“破”和“立”两部分。就驳论环节来说,首当其冲的是以Frege和Russel为发端的描述语理论,即,一个名称的实质在于它能够被还原为一系列的描述语,后者相应构成了名称之意义的语义来源。Late Wittgenstein和Searle也顺着这一理路发展了描述语“家族”之不完全集合的形态。然而,根据Kripke的论证,语义内部的还原主义似乎总无法避开“循环论证”的知识论缺陷,况且这样的还原也不能经过模态逻辑之“可能世界”的检验。因此,妥善的解决方案应当把问题域确立在语义外部论的维度,通过社会历史情境的“命名仪式”予以因果联结。 (展开)
0 有用 地上丝绒 2022-06-07 20:54:22
两个烂尾楼,克里普克真聪明呀
0 有用 Athanatos 2022-05-29 21:48:12
这肯定不是我最后一次读这本书。