出版社: University Of Chicago Press
出版年: 1996-12-15
ISBN: 9780226458083
页数: 212
装帧: Paperback
定价: USD 13.00
内容简介 · · · · · ·
Since the publication of this book in 1962, Kuhn's writings (and many of his ideas, such as "paradigm shift") have been highly influential in academic and popular discourse. This book is must-reading for anyone studying the history and philosophy of science specifically, or cultural or technological change generally.
Since Kuhn does not permit truth to be a criterion of scienti...
Since the publication of this book in 1962, Kuhn's writings (and many of his ideas, such as "paradigm shift") have been highly influential in academic and popular discourse. This book is must-reading for anyone studying the history and philosophy of science specifically, or cultural or technological change generally.
Since Kuhn does not permit truth to be a criterion of scientific theories, he would presumably not claim his own theory to be true. But if causing a revolution is the hallmark of a superior paradigm, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions has been a resounding success.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions的创作者
· · · · · ·
-
托马斯·库恩 作者 -
作者简介 · · · · · ·
Thomas Samuel Kuhn (surname pronounced /ˈkuːn/; July 18, 1922 – June 17, 1996) was an American physicist who wrote extensively on the history of science and developed several important notions in the sociology and philosophy of science.
喜欢读"The Structure of Scientific Revolutions"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 187 条 )
科学革命之路上的八卦
被现代科学证伪的理论真的应该被鄙视吗? ——谈库恩《科学革命的结构》
这篇书评可能有关键情节透露
中学时,政治老师谈到牛顿,曾痛心疾首地说“牛顿是一位多么伟大的物理学家,可是他晚年时用了几十年的时候去证明‘上帝是第一推动力’,并写了几百页的废纸。如果他能把这些时间拿去研究别的东西,那对科学是多么有意义的一件事啊。” 无论从唯物主义,还是以当代科学的眼光... (展开)【转】伊安·哈金:《科学革命的结构》50周年纪念
无责任简介:托马斯•库恩《科学革命的结构》
论坛 · · · · · ·
在这本书的论坛里发言这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部15 )
-
北京大学出版社 (2012)9.0分 3868人读过
-
北京大学出版社 (2004)8.8分 1661人读过
-
北京大学出版社 (2022)9.2分 1121人读过
-
University Of Chicago Press (2012)8.9分 154人读过
以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )
- 哲学宅男理想书架 (hkstehtstark)
- 【MIT】麻省理工--脑与认知科学--阅读书目 (Shawn™)
- Glen Weyl的价格理论书单(威力加强版) (Yii)
- The 100 Best Non-Fiction Books of the Century (ZG)
- 1000+ 豆瓣9.0+的書 (Python)
谁读这本书? · · · · · ·
二手市场
· · · · · ·
订阅关于The Structure of Scientific Revolutions的评论:
feed: rss 2.0










1 有用 Welfare 2013-10-12 05:37:30
Ask your research if it "again gives me hope and joy in life...I believe it is again possible to march forward."pp84; Recognize sth.has gone fundamentally wrong, and your training has equipped you to ... Ask your research if it "again gives me hope and joy in life...I believe it is again possible to march forward."pp84; Recognize sth.has gone fundamentally wrong, and your training has equipped you to deal with it;Able and beautiful to solve problems that alternative old paradigms failed;Explain phenomena previously unknown/link lower level theories (展开)
2 有用 sankomi 2018-01-12 09:05:12
从人文学科的角度思考Kuhn对“范式”的界定很有意思。Kuhn认为科学的发展不是线性积累,而是范式转移;范式之间不存在优劣之分,而是反映了人类在特定历史语境下对世界不同的认知。这背后的历史观也是当代人文学科的基本假设。但换个角度看,用paradigm来描述人文学科似乎又不太妥当。科学的新范式一旦形成,就相应生成了一系列待解决的问题。Kuhn把科学家的任务描述为"puzzle-solving",想方... 从人文学科的角度思考Kuhn对“范式”的界定很有意思。Kuhn认为科学的发展不是线性积累,而是范式转移;范式之间不存在优劣之分,而是反映了人类在特定历史语境下对世界不同的认知。这背后的历史观也是当代人文学科的基本假设。但换个角度看,用paradigm来描述人文学科似乎又不太妥当。科学的新范式一旦形成,就相应生成了一系列待解决的问题。Kuhn把科学家的任务描述为"puzzle-solving",想方设法证实或证伪现存的假设。而对人文学科来说,发现和提出问题的过程本身就是困难的。人文学界似乎没有某个范式的影响可以大到提出universal的问题。人文学者挑战现存范式的热情往往大于应用某个范式的热情,这是好事,但其实也是个致命的问题。 (展开)
0 有用 真猪奶茶 2017-07-24 15:02:00
~~~
0 有用 Len 2013-08-26 00:49:59
生词不多,阅读完全无障碍
0 有用 伞保护协会 2012-01-19 07:33:43
2011Fall TA