作者:
Annette B. Weiner
出版社: University of California Press
副标题: The Paradox of Keeping-while-giving
出版年: 01 April, 1992
页数: 264
定价: $25.00
装帧: Paperback
ISBN: 9780520076044
出版社: University of California Press
副标题: The Paradox of Keeping-while-giving
出版年: 01 April, 1992
页数: 264
定价: $25.00
装帧: Paperback
ISBN: 9780520076044
以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )
- study of food and eating (白开水心)
- 最喜欢的民族志top10 (越洋鲫鱼)
- Anthropology (多阿多糯)
- 书单|人类学 (复健太空人)
- History 382 Reciprocity Archive (Мишка)
谁读这本书? · · · · · ·
二手市场
· · · · · ·
- 在豆瓣转让 有65人想读,手里有一本闲着?
订阅关于Inalienable Possessions的评论:
feed: rss 2.0
1 有用 化城 2017-03-06 23:14:19
Exchange theory, what drives exchange is not the hau but the desire to keep inalienable objects. The keeping of “inalienable possession” “confirms difference rather than equivalence” and serves as “a... Exchange theory, what drives exchange is not the hau but the desire to keep inalienable objects. The keeping of “inalienable possession” “confirms difference rather than equivalence” and serves as “a possible future claim and potential source of power”(1992: 10). (展开)
0 有用 奥博洛莫夫 2023-11-15 17:34:55 中国香港
好喜欢好喜欢Weiner,无论是想法还是语言论证,最契合的了
0 有用 越洋鲫鱼 2022-06-14 21:40:11
太难啃了,对非太平洋民族志专家毫不友好。在理论、材料和写作方法上都是Graeber那本《value》的先声。人类学的礼物理论的转向之作,1.在反reciprocity上走出了开创性道路,打开了完全不同的理论可能 2.把女性再生产的价值理论拉入政治领域,展示女性参政的方式,打通gender、gift和hierarchy表征的理论关联
0 有用 奥博洛莫夫 2023-11-15 17:34:55 中国香港
好喜欢好喜欢Weiner,无论是想法还是语言论证,最契合的了
0 有用 越洋鲫鱼 2022-06-14 21:40:11
太难啃了,对非太平洋民族志专家毫不友好。在理论、材料和写作方法上都是Graeber那本《value》的先声。人类学的礼物理论的转向之作,1.在反reciprocity上走出了开创性道路,打开了完全不同的理论可能 2.把女性再生产的价值理论拉入政治领域,展示女性参政的方式,打通gender、gift和hierarchy表征的理论关联
1 有用 化城 2017-03-06 23:14:19
Exchange theory, what drives exchange is not the hau but the desire to keep inalienable objects. The keeping of “inalienable possession” “confirms difference rather than equivalence” and serves as “a... Exchange theory, what drives exchange is not the hau but the desire to keep inalienable objects. The keeping of “inalienable possession” “confirms difference rather than equivalence” and serves as “a possible future claim and potential source of power”(1992: 10). (展开)