In this incisive book, Michel de Certeau considers the uses to which social representation and modes of social behavior are put by individuals and groups, describing the tactics available to the common man for reclaiming his own autonomy from the all-pervasive forces of commerce, politics, and culture. In exploring the public meaning of ingeniously defended private meanings, de...
In this incisive book, Michel de Certeau considers the uses to which social representation and modes of social behavior are put by individuals and groups, describing the tactics available to the common man for reclaiming his own autonomy from the all-pervasive forces of commerce, politics, and culture. In exploring the public meaning of ingeniously defended private meanings, de Certeau draws brilliantly on an immense theoretical literature to speak of an apposite use of imaginative literature.
作者简介
· · · · · ·
The late Michel de Certeau was Directeur d'Etudes at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales in Paris and Visiting Professor of French and Comparative Literature at University of California, San Diego.
The unchanging traveller is pigeonholed, numbered, and regulated in the grid of the railway car, which is a perfect actualization of the rational utopia.
Only a rationalized cell travels. A bubble of panoptic and classifying order, a closed and autonomous insularity - that is what can traverse space and make itself independent of local roots.
Inside, there is the immobility of an order. Here rest and dreams reign supreme. There is nothing to do, one is in the state of reason.
Between the immobility of the inside and that of the outside a certain quid pro quo is introduced, a slender blade that inverts their stability. The chiasm is produced by the windowpane and the rail. These are two themes found in Jules Verne, the Victor Hugo of travel literature: the porthole of the Nautilus, a transp... (查看原文)
The unconsciousness of the group studied was the price that had to be paid (the price it had to pay) for its coherence. A society could be a system only without knowing it. Whence the corollary: an ethnologist was required to know what the society was without knowing it. Today, an ethnologist would no longer dare to say (if not to think) that. How can Bourdieu compromise himself in this way in the name of sociology? (查看原文)
This is the first book I read In LSU. It changed my idea to the history. We make the history by the practice of everyday life. Based on post-structural theory, history was written by us, it is all abo...This is the first book I read In LSU. It changed my idea to the history. We make the history by the practice of everyday life. Based on post-structural theory, history was written by us, it is all about language rather than the events. The same events and materials may discovered and interpreted in different ways, now and in the future. It is a pro(展开)
sirius_flower
University of California Press2011版
江海一蓑翁
南京大学出版社2015版
Eco
南京大学出版社2009版
antiniu
南京大学出版社2009版
1 有用 如 2012-09-26 23:57:06
看题目貌似很浅显，其实内容非常深奥但是深入浅出〜其实针对日常的理论最为艰深吧...里面提出的很多概念是独创而且非常有趣的，值得细读的很棒的一本书。又没有中文版本哎...
13 有用 短章 2015-10-30 01:54:03
作者为“普通人”和日常生活 / 实践立传的野心已经被颂扬已久，这一点值得敬仰。为了达到目的火力全开，用康德索绪尔弗洛伊德一众人（偶尔还有易经的六十四卦）来攻击福柯和布迪厄，也是很具围观价值。只是，整本书里充斥着各种各样的二分法，其有效性是否全部值得信赖？别的先不提，把时间和空间对立，空间和地方对立，无视地理学者们的工作，这真的好吗？至于被广泛引用的 tactics和 strategy之区分，好像也... 作者为“普通人”和日常生活 / 实践立传的野心已经被颂扬已久，这一点值得敬仰。为了达到目的火力全开，用康德索绪尔弗洛伊德一众人（偶尔还有易经的六十四卦）来攻击福柯和布迪厄，也是很具围观价值。只是，整本书里充斥着各种各样的二分法，其有效性是否全部值得信赖？别的先不提，把时间和空间对立，空间和地方对立，无视地理学者们的工作，这真的好吗？至于被广泛引用的 tactics和 strategy之区分，好像也并非无懈可击的金科玉律。当这几样有问题的二分法交织在一起时，危险也就愈加突出了。 (展开)
1 有用 蒹葭 2011-09-27 09:28:01
這部書其實不容易看，主要是第2章前結構還算清楚，一般人也只關心strategy和tactic分野，就覺得簡單了。後頭才是重點。
1 有用 摸壹嗷 2020-03-29 12:44:52
为了写历史课的paper读到的意料之外的好书。主要思想很法国哲学，但作者把社会学写成了散文诗，遣词造句真的太诗化了。如果能读得下来法语原版应该更好吧。
1 有用 企鹅爸爸 2013-01-28 08:00:51
This is the first book I read In LSU. It changed my idea to the history. We make the history by the practice of everyday life. Based on post-structural theory, history was written by us, it is all abo... This is the first book I read In LSU. It changed my idea to the history. We make the history by the practice of everyday life. Based on post-structural theory, history was written by us, it is all about language rather than the events. The same events and materials may discovered and interpreted in different ways, now and in the future. It is a pro (展开)