On its first publication in 1973 Adam Kuper's entertaining history of half a century of British social anthropology provoked strong reactions. But his often irreverent account soon established itself as one of the introductions to anthropology. Since the second revised edition was published in 1983, important developments have occurred within British and European anthropology. ...
On its first publication in 1973 Adam Kuper's entertaining history of half a century of British social anthropology provoked strong reactions. But his often irreverent account soon established itself as one of the introductions to anthropology. Since the second revised edition was published in 1983, important developments have occurred within British and European anthropology. This third, enlarged and updated edition responds to these fresh currents. Adam Kuper takes the story up to the present day, and a new final chapter traces the emergence of a modern European social anthropology in contrast with developments in American cultural anthropology over the last two decades. Anthropology and Anthropologists provides a critical historical account of modern British social anthropology: it describes the careers of the major theorists, their ideas and their contributions in the context of the intellectual and institutional environments in which they worked.
喳精
商务印书馆2021版
示播列
商务印书馆2021版
江船火独明
商务印书馆2021版
马庄
商务印书馆2021版
0 有用 木少眠 2012-05-28 10:45:33
教材
0 有用 vermiglia 2014-07-28 12:17:38
学科发展史，穿插业界掌故，勾勒轮廓点到为止。
0 有用 微夫 2015-06-30 20:50:57
各种八卦
0 有用 Tayadawahkugh 2018-11-04 23:51:26
英国人类学历史
0 有用 Dynamo 2021-09-17 05:36:50
行内人写的英国人类学发展史，侧重Malinowski和Radcliffe-Brown其后直到1980s的学者，内容方面一半聊党争，一半写发展，偶尔浅谈理论，穿插无数八卦。作者对于马、布两人的思想脉络、个人性格，以及衍生出的两派纷争讲得蛮清晰，Edmund Leach部分还单独开了一章，真不错，我也喜欢Leach！此外Durkheim和Levi-Strauss俩法国人出镜率颇高，可见二人对英国学界影... 行内人写的英国人类学发展史，侧重Malinowski和Radcliffe-Brown其后直到1980s的学者，内容方面一半聊党争，一半写发展，偶尔浅谈理论，穿插无数八卦。作者对于马、布两人的思想脉络、个人性格，以及衍生出的两派纷争讲得蛮清晰，Edmund Leach部分还单独开了一章，真不错，我也喜欢Leach！此外Durkheim和Levi-Strauss俩法国人出镜率颇高，可见二人对英国学界影响之显著。读完后理论上的收获并不多，倒是给一众大学者的形象祛了魅。可能是我现在层次还是太低吧.....现在想想，要读学科史真心不该选这本的。 (展开)