The summary of a deductive argument takes the last point, puts it above, and adds a "because" to cover the first two points. Inductive reasoning brings together a set of like conclusions and draws an inference based on seeing a similarity between them. Prefer inductive reasoning to deductive reasoning at the key line level, because it is easier for the reader to absorb.
2020-04-30 00:41
The summary of a deductive argument takes the last point, puts it above, and adds a "because" to cover the first two points.
Inductive reasoning brings together a set of like conclusions and draws an inference based on seeing a similarity between them.
Prefer inductive reasoning to deductive reasoning at the key line level, because it is easier for the reader to absorb.
A deductive relationship is established if the second point comments on the first, leading to a “therefore” conclusion. Inductive relationship resides in the structure of the sentence. Look for similarity in either the subjects or the predicates, and draw your inference based on that similarity. If there is no similarity, you can draw no inference, and the points do not belong in the document.
2020-04-20 06:59
A deductive relationship is established if the second point comments on the first, leading to a “therefore” conclusion. Inductive relationship resides in the structure of the sentence. Look for similarity in either the subjects or the predicates, and draw your inference based on that similarity. If there is no similarity, you can draw no inference, and the points do not belong in the document.
The introduction will always be in the form of a story - that is, it will establish a familiar situation, bring into play a complication that in turn triggers a question, and then answer that question. The story form is a most useful device in organizing a reader's prior knowledge, and once mastered will enable you to work out the structure of most short documents very quickly, particularly onc...
2020-04-20 02:29
The introduction will always be in the form of a story - that is, it will establish a familiar situation, bring into play a complication that in turn triggers a question, and then answer that question. The story form is a most useful device in organizing a reader's prior knowledge, and once mastered will enable you to work out the structure of most short documents very quickly, particularly once you recognize that introductions tend to fall into a limited number of common patterns.
To order the idea top down. It is very easy to communicate your ideas arranged in a pyramidal form by simply starting from the top and moving down each leg of the pyramid. The statement of the main idea will cause the reader to question the basis for making that point and the next level of the pyramid answers that question. The writer can continue this question/answer dialogue until all the ide...
2015-05-25 20:41
To order the idea top down. It is very easy to communicate your ideas arranged in a pyramidal form by simply starting from the top and moving down each leg of the pyramid. The statement of the main idea will cause the reader to question the basis for making that point and the next level of the pyramid answers that question. The writer can continue this question/answer dialogue until all the ideas in the pyramid is communicated to the reader.
The mind cannot hold more than about seven items in its short time memory at any one time. Therefore, we should categorize the items into logical group so that they can be contained.
Controlling the sequence in which you present your idea is the single most important act necessary to clear writing.
The clearest written document presents its idea consistently from the top down, in a pyramidal structure, even though the thinking will have been started from bottom up.
S-Complication-Q Why SCQ The narrative flow lends a feeling of plausibility to the writer's particular interpretation,which by its nature must be a biased selection of the relevant fact. This feeling of plausibility constricts the readers ability to interpret the situation differently,in much the same way that a trial lawyers opening statement seeks to gave the jury a framework in which to rece...
2013-07-30 16:02
S-Complication-Q
Why SCQ
The narrative flow lends a feeling of plausibility to the writer's particular interpretation,which by its nature must be a biased selection of the relevant fact. This feeling of plausibility constricts the readers ability to interpret the situation differently,in much the same way that a trial lawyers opening statement seeks to gave the jury a framework in which to receive the evidence to come.
The TOP-DOWN Approach S=They requested change C=You asked if it makes sense Q=Does it make sense? THE BOTTOM-UP APPROACH 3-step process 1.list all the points you think you want to make. 2.Work out the relationships between them. 3.Draw conclusions
2013-07-24 00:41
The TOP-DOWN Approach
TOP-DOWN
S=They requested change
C=You asked if it makes sense
Q=Does it make sense?
THE BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
3-step process
1.list all the points you think you want to make.
2.Work out the relationships between them.
3.Draw conclusions
The summary of a deductive argument takes the last point, puts it above, and adds a "because" to cover the first two points. Inductive reasoning brings together a set of like conclusions and draws an inference based on seeing a similarity between them. Prefer inductive reasoning to deductive reasoning at the key line level, because it is easier for the reader to absorb.
2020-04-30 00:41
The summary of a deductive argument takes the last point, puts it above, and adds a "because" to cover the first two points.
Inductive reasoning brings together a set of like conclusions and draws an inference based on seeing a similarity between them.
Prefer inductive reasoning to deductive reasoning at the key line level, because it is easier for the reader to absorb.
A deductive relationship is established if the second point comments on the first, leading to a “therefore” conclusion. Inductive relationship resides in the structure of the sentence. Look for similarity in either the subjects or the predicates, and draw your inference based on that similarity. If there is no similarity, you can draw no inference, and the points do not belong in the document.
2020-04-20 06:59
A deductive relationship is established if the second point comments on the first, leading to a “therefore” conclusion. Inductive relationship resides in the structure of the sentence. Look for similarity in either the subjects or the predicates, and draw your inference based on that similarity. If there is no similarity, you can draw no inference, and the points do not belong in the document.
The introduction will always be in the form of a story - that is, it will establish a familiar situation, bring into play a complication that in turn triggers a question, and then answer that question. The story form is a most useful device in organizing a reader's prior knowledge, and once mastered will enable you to work out the structure of most short documents very quickly, particularly onc...
2020-04-20 02:29
The introduction will always be in the form of a story - that is, it will establish a familiar situation, bring into play a complication that in turn triggers a question, and then answer that question. The story form is a most useful device in organizing a reader's prior knowledge, and once mastered will enable you to work out the structure of most short documents very quickly, particularly once you recognize that introductions tend to fall into a limited number of common patterns.
时间的玫瑰
民主与建设出版社2002版
秋叶
民主与建设出版社2002版
，
民主与建设出版社2002版
雷达
南海出版社2010版
糖鱼
民主与建设出版社2002版
叶小鱼
南海出版社2010版
雪小豹说
民主与建设出版社2002版
金台望道
南海出版公司2013版
leo张大志
南海出版社2010版
The summary of a deductive argument takes the last point, puts it above, and adds a "because" to cover the first two points. Inductive reasoning brings together a set of like conclusions and draws an inference based on seeing a similarity between them. Prefer inductive reasoning to deductive reasoning at the key line level, because it is easier for the reader to absorb.
0 有用 Nameless 2020-02-20
写petition都厉害了起来
0 有用 笑一步是好青年 2019-04-03
"why are you telling me this?" "We should...why?...ok How?" "Bottom up is easier to grab than top down."
0 有用 dz902 2014-03-15
如果每篇文章，每本书都这么逻辑清晰，结构明白就好了。写作者和问题解决者都应该读一读。稍啰嗦繁复，如果能简练成为手册一样的口袋书，就完美了。
0 有用 6:01 AM 2019-11-13
The Consulting Bible
0 有用 地中海胖叔 2018-09-08
书写得很好。内容是关于思维方法，很基础的那些，对于现在的我已经没什么帮助。
0 有用 paracelsus 2020-12-29
这本书也是二八原则，读了前半基本就够了。
0 有用 南宫云 2020-11-18
Mutually Exclusive and Collectively Exhaustive
0 有用 就逛一圈儿 2020-05-08
这本书是15年刚当上部门总监的时候，集团HR总监推荐每人必读的书籍。能够非常清晰地帮助大家树立思路，第一遍读完觉得帮助很大，等到第二遍读完并且做成PPT给新人进行培训的时候，加深了金字塔原理的理解。 基本上现在其他人跟我讲一件事情，多么复杂的事情在脑海里面也能一层一层地区分开来，这个时候get到对方的点是多么的重要。 强烈推荐！！！！
0 有用 Nameless 2020-02-20
写petition都厉害了起来
0 有用 icy 2020-02-02
很多人推荐的一本书，借着2020特殊的春节长假把英文版和中文版都看了。用自己的一句话总结就是，把“对疑惑的回应或者新的思考”以一座一座金字塔的形式展示出来，铺垫在“故事”的结构下。 具体来说，任何写作和思考都是对疑惑的回应，或者产生新的观点。这是思考的初衷和写作的原点。而每个产生的观点又可能会引起新的疑惑，总而产生纵向结构。有时为了解释一个观点，需要组织多个同类事物来解释（归纳），或组织完整的推... 很多人推荐的一本书，借着2020特殊的春节长假把英文版和中文版都看了。用自己的一句话总结就是，把“对疑惑的回应或者新的思考”以一座一座金字塔的形式展示出来，铺垫在“故事”的结构下。 具体来说，任何写作和思考都是对疑惑的回应，或者产生新的观点。这是思考的初衷和写作的原点。而每个产生的观点又可能会引起新的疑惑，总而产生纵向结构。有时为了解释一个观点，需要组织多个同类事物来解释（归纳），或组织完整的推论链条（演绎）。那么一个塔尖下可由多个相互联系的想法支撑。出售这个观点（selling, writing, consulting, whatever...）时，既需要向读者点明背景和共识，也需要描绘困难困惑，然后回答读者在面对困惑时自然而然问出的问题——以整理成金字塔结构的思考为答案。 (展开)