出版社: Oxford University Press
出版年: 1997-6-26
页数: 315
定价: USD 65.00
装帧: Paperback
ISBN: 9780198761235
内容简介 · · · · · ·
H L A Hart's The Concept of Law is the classic text for the study of jurisprudence and legal philosophy and is probably the most important work of legal philosophy written this century. This second edition is particularly valuable as it combines Hart's original text with a postscript, in which he responds to criticisms of his theory levelled by such notable scholars as Dworkin,...
H L A Hart's The Concept of Law is the classic text for the study of jurisprudence and legal philosophy and is probably the most important work of legal philosophy written this century. This second edition is particularly valuable as it combines Hart's original text with a postscript, in which he responds to criticisms of his theory levelled by such notable scholars as Dworkin, Fuller and Finnis. Written by him but only discovered after his death, it has been ably edited by Joseph Raz and Penelope Bulloch of Balliol College, Oxford.
作者简介 · · · · · ·
H.L.A. (Herbert) Hart (1907-1992)
was the son of a Jewish tailor of Polish and German descent. He was educated at Bradford Grammar School and New College Oxford, where he obtained a brilliant first class in Classical Greats. He practised at the Chancery Bar from 1932 to 1940 along with Richard (later Lord) Wilberforce. During the war, being unfit for active service, he worked i...
H.L.A. (Herbert) Hart (1907-1992)
was the son of a Jewish tailor of Polish and German descent. He was educated at Bradford Grammar School and New College Oxford, where he obtained a brilliant first class in Classical Greats. He practised at the Chancery Bar from 1932 to 1940 along with Richard (later Lord) Wilberforce. During the war, being unfit for active service, he worked in MI5. During this time his interests returned to philosophy and in 1945 he was appointed philosophy tutor at New College. He was strongly influenced by the linguistic philosophy then current in Oxford, but employed its techniques more constructively than did most members of the movement. In 1952, given his chancery background, he was persuaded by J.L. Austin to be a candidate for the Oxford chair of Jurisprudence when Professor Arthur Goodhart resigned. He was elected and held the chair until 1969.
From 1952 on he delivered the undergraduate lectures that turned into The Concept of Law (1961, posthumous second edition 1994). He also lectured on right and duties, but these lectures were never published. He held seminars with Tony Honoré on causation, leading to their joint work Causation in the Law (1959, second edition 1985). His visit to Harvard in 1956-7 led to his Holmes lecture on 'Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals' (1958) and a famous controversy with Lon Fuller. Returning to the UK he engaged in an equally famous debate with Patrick (later Lord) Devlin on the limits within which the criminal law should try to enforce morality. Hart published two books on the subject, Law, Liberty and Morality (1963) and The Morality of the Criminal Law (1965). A wider interest in criminal law, stimulated by Rupert (later Professor Sir Rupert) Cross was signalled by his 'Prolegomenon to the Principles of Punishment' (1959). Nine of his essays on the criminal law were collected in Punishment and Responsibility (1968). In 1968 he was asked by Oxford University to chair a commission on relations with junior members, then at a low ebb, and produced a notably perceptive and constructive report.
Feeling that his powers were waning Hart resigned his chair in 1969, to be succeeded by Ronald Dworkin, a severe critic of his legal philosophy. He now devoted himself mainly to the study of Bentham, whom, along with Kelsen, he regarded as the most important legal philosopher of modern times. Ten of his essays were collected in Essays on Bentham (1982). From 1973 to 1978 he was Principal of Brasenose College. In his last years he was much concerned to find a convincing reply to Dworkin's criticisms of his version of legal positivism. A sketch of Hart's reply is to be found in the postscript to the second edition of The Concept of Law.
Hart's main aim as a lecturer and writer was to tell the truth and be clear. He was the most widely read British legal philosopher of the twentieth century and his work will continue to be a focus of discussion.
喜欢读"The Concept of Law"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·
- Law's Empire 9.3
- 普通法传统 7.2
- 大师学述:富勒 8.6
- 法律的权威 8.4
- 身披法袍的正义 8.4
- 认真对待权利 8.4
- 法律、自由与道德 8.2
- 法律、语言与法律的确定性 8.1
The Concept of Law的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 30 条 )
《法律的概念》读书笔记(一至六章)
《法律的概念》第一章:恼人不休的问题
这篇书评可能有关键情节透露
1. 法理论的困惑 在法学发展过程中,“什么是法律”这个问题被不断讨论,并且各种学者和法律人对这个问题提出了多种不同的回答。但在其他的一些自然科学或医学学科,如“什么是化学?什么是医学?”这些问题并不会成为讨论的焦点。为什么会出现这样的情况呢? 大部分人可以很容... (展开)第三版导言的翻译问题
哈特法理论的三重变奏——以《法律的概念》为出发点
这篇书评可能有关键情节透露
赫伯特·哈特,被称为20世纪英美国家最伟大的法理学家,在哈特之前,英美国家的法理学界讨论的都是诸如“所有”、“占有”、“法人”等概念的酸腐学科,哈特以哲学的方法,以一般化的视角提出了一般化的、描述性的宏大叙述的法学理论,他的理论的诞生,对英美法系的意义相当重... (展开)許家馨:《法律的概念(第二版)》导读
哈特对于奥斯丁“以威胁为后盾的命令”法律模型的批判
这篇书评可能有关键情节透露
英国人哈特所著的《法律的概念》,第三版最早于1961年以英文出版。该书是哈特在法理学绪论课程的基础上写成的,授课对象是牛津大学的法科学生,被当作法理学的入门著作。用哈特本人的话来说,“法律人会将此书视为分析法学的一篇论文,因为它所关心的是阐明法律思维的一般架构... (展开)> 更多书评 30篇
这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部10 )
-
法律出版社 (2018)9.1分 457人读过
-
法律出版社 (2006)9.1分 509人读过
-
法律出版社 (2011)9.1分 327人读过
-
中国大百科全书出版社 (2003)8.3分 309人读过
在哪儿借这本书 · · · · · ·
以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )
- 我的原版书 (新月)
- 一个法科学生的原版书单 (一步天涯)
- APSA Benjamin E. Lippincott Award Books (Aragorn)
- 政治哲學 (又及)
- 近期待购之书 (Icarus2022)
谁读这本书? · · · · · ·
二手市场
· · · · · ·
订阅关于The Concept of Law的评论:
feed: rss 2.0
0 有用 昨夜闲潭梦落花 2021-12-09 14:49:56
没觉得见解深刻(出版年代久?);论证绵密,甚至有些繁琐,但条理分明,crystal cear 长句实在折磨人
0 有用 山洞人 2013-11-13 11:27:58
positivism的新生
0 有用 Wolfgang 2014-09-21 15:21:30
之前读过法律出版社两位台湾学者的译作,读完原版后还是发现了不少翻译中存在的问题。Zum Beispiel, 两位台湾前辈将Primary Rule和Secondary Rule分别翻译为初级规则和次级规则,相对于原生规则和次生规则的翻译,后者更加符合Pro. Hart的原意。
0 有用 文盲殿大学士 2013-08-19 22:41:09
还需要仔细消化消化。
0 有用 遠山 2013-01-21 19:24:24
英文还是有点弱啊……有时还要对照中译本…惭愧
0 有用 哈哈哈,哼 2023-08-19 21:15:55 江苏
从2022年3月开始到2023年8月17日毕,认真读完的第一本英文书。
0 有用 薄荷茶 2022-07-14 12:07:31
味道仿佛在嚼沙漠里曝晒了三天三夜的干毛巾
0 有用 昨夜闲潭梦落花 2021-12-09 14:49:56
没觉得见解深刻(出版年代久?);论证绵密,甚至有些繁琐,但条理分明,crystal cear 长句实在折磨人
0 有用 故事大王王老师 2021-09-24 12:42:09
属实喜欢不起来。
0 有用 工具人 2021-02-15 23:49:29
法律概念分析的方法论简介,法律规范性问题的提出,对命令理论的反驳,规则理论的替代和内在视角的阐明。哈特的书真是比德沃金清楚太多了。。。