Perhaps the most important work of philosophy written in the twentieth century, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus was the only philosophical work that Ludwig Wittgenstein published during his lifetime. Written in short, carefully numbered paragraphs of extreme brilliance, it captured the imagination of a generation of philosophers. For Wittgenstein, logic was something we use to c...
Perhaps the most important work of philosophy written in the twentieth century, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus was the only philosophical work that Ludwig Wittgenstein published during his lifetime. Written in short, carefully numbered paragraphs of extreme brilliance, it captured the imagination of a generation of philosophers. For Wittgenstein, logic was something we use to conquer a reality which is in itself both elusive and unobtainable. He famously summarized the book in the following words: 'What can be said at all can be said clearly; and what we cannot talk about we must pass over in silence.' David Pears and Brian McGuinness received the highest praise for their meticulous translation. The work is prefaced by Bertrand Russell's original introduction to the first English edition.
Routledge Classics(共182册),
这套丛书还有
《The Dogma of Christ》《How the Irish Became White》《Wickedness》《Sex and Repression in Savage Society》《King Solomon's Ring》
等
。
本来是随手翻看书评,找了篇点赞最多的点进去。一下被那种清晰、有力、简洁的语言吸引了。 明明是”枯燥“”正经“的哲学论文,书评的最后一段却出人意料地拨动人的心弦:So this book is a kind of curative "nonsense", like a purgative for the soul; it is meant to clean...
(展开)
0 有用 蒲花柳絮 2011-12-03 22:20:44
由德文翻译而来,翻译的比较简单易读。个别翻译有争论,多参考些相关资料就无碍了。
0 有用 lubo 2013-02-16 23:27:27
第1遍。
0 有用 小葡萄 2014-03-13 22:33:28
一周目
0 有用 S/Z 2013-05-30 11:05:22
highly overrated…nothing really original & creative...Frege+Husserl would be enough...
0 有用 豆友140080754 2020-08-01 11:30:11
Bedeutung译成了meaning而不是reference,中译则为指称。Walt大佬说每一种翻译都包含了理解,中译可能出于Frege的区分才这么做。黄敏的笺释有详细一些的解释,这里仅仅是指称的可能。
0 有用 moria 2023-11-01 14:50:03 北京
凡是不可评价的书,要保持沉默。
0 有用 ChristopherTin 2023-08-02 23:01:24 美国
这部著作维特根斯坦论述了关于支撑我们思维的基本结构的根本问题,以及受到这些结构的必然限制意味着什么。同时,维特根斯坦认为,西方传统的哲学和解决都是因为对符号系统原则的无知和对语言的误用而产生,所以西方哲学根本就是一派胡言。而维特根斯坦想通过自己的著作把这些思想的管道从多年积累的污垢中解放出来。 要理解这些问题,你需要对罗素、弗雷格有深入的了解;或者你必须要弄懂这些建议涉及到的思维、知识、语言、科学... 这部著作维特根斯坦论述了关于支撑我们思维的基本结构的根本问题,以及受到这些结构的必然限制意味着什么。同时,维特根斯坦认为,西方传统的哲学和解决都是因为对符号系统原则的无知和对语言的误用而产生,所以西方哲学根本就是一派胡言。而维特根斯坦想通过自己的著作把这些思想的管道从多年积累的污垢中解放出来。 要理解这些问题,你需要对罗素、弗雷格有深入的了解;或者你必须要弄懂这些建议涉及到的思维、知识、语言、科学等问题的逻辑分析以及世界本质的构成、唯我论的真理性; 对于维特根斯坦的论断,是如此一针见血,如此铿锵有力,以至于让人不假思索地就会同意他的观点。然而,经过一番思考,我有所保留。但就像大多数优秀的哲学著作一样,即使不接受其论断,阅读它也是有益的。 (展开)
0 有用 豆友270625758 2023-05-13 20:44:33 福建
德英对照版五过
0 有用 豆友265782719 2023-03-12 12:22:00 福建
德英对照版第五过
0 有用 阿匪 2023-03-08 13:07:17 美国
大部分都没看到懂,不过logical space的比喻真的很有想像力。不同的objects因其内在的逻辑性质,通过各种潜在的命题相连,组成一个整体的网络。在某种意义上和柏拉图的语言哲学相呼应:forms之间的关系构成一个多面而有机的living creature,而不同forms拼合而成的speech同样也因此分沾了生命力。