A greatly expanded edition of a masterpiece by a world-class pianist and writer on music.This outstanding book treating the three most beloved composers of the Vienna School is basic to any study of Classicalera music. Drawing on his rich experience and intimate familiarity with the works of these giants, Charles Rosen presents his keen insights in clear and persuasive language...
A greatly expanded edition of a masterpiece by a world-class pianist and writer on music.This outstanding book treating the three most beloved composers of the Vienna School is basic to any study of Classicalera music. Drawing on his rich experience and intimate familiarity with the works of these giants, Charles Rosen presents his keen insights in clear and persuasive language.For this expanded edition, now available in paperback for the first time, Rosen has provided a new, 64-page chapter on the later years of Beethoven and the musical conventions he inherited from Haydn and Mozart. The author has also written an extensive new preface in which he responds to other writers who have commented on his ideas.
Rosen论三位作曲家器乐作品的文字,外人没法插嘴。放眼天下音乐学家,死的活的都算上,Rosen也就是对Donald F. Tovey一人比较服气而已。Rosen记性好,耳朵好,又敢说。莫扎特的钢琴协奏曲,几张唱片,几本谱子,够啃一辈子的,跟Rosen学习怎么啃,学会了就是一辈子受用了。 不...
(展开)
4 有用 烛光前 2011-02-01 22:15:16
It's such a marvelous work that it compels me to take a full-detailed note. Started reading on Jan. 4.
1 有用 蟫尾 2022-02-20 02:11:12
读了一个月。此书可能是音乐分析的最佳范例:音与音、乐章与乐章、曲与曲之间,原来充满着呼应和对比。要是不厘清理解这些关系,我们对音乐的所谓高谈阔论或许只是空谈。Rosen的独出机杼在于指出了海顿、莫扎特音乐的“新”和贝多芬相对的“旧”:前二者尝试着revolutionise conventions;而出乎意料的是,贝多芬其实很少打破既定规则,相反,穷尽既有规则的一切潜力,才是他的原创性所在。我也很欣... 读了一个月。此书可能是音乐分析的最佳范例:音与音、乐章与乐章、曲与曲之间,原来充满着呼应和对比。要是不厘清理解这些关系,我们对音乐的所谓高谈阔论或许只是空谈。Rosen的独出机杼在于指出了海顿、莫扎特音乐的“新”和贝多芬相对的“旧”:前二者尝试着revolutionise conventions;而出乎意料的是,贝多芬其实很少打破既定规则,相反,穷尽既有规则的一切潜力,才是他的原创性所在。我也很欣赏Rosen的观点,即我们课堂上所学的Classical Style恐怕无法解释三位大师的ingenuity, 而Classical Style, 其实是后人的总结,不是既定的创作规则。In short, it’s a masterpiece! (展开)
0 有用 bnxkhvs 2019-10-29 23:10:15
017
1 有用 珈琲貓少女 2020-04-21 23:33:04
📍4/21/20