I read the whole book page to page, even managed to translate two chapters of the book. Very Deleuzian. 2 or 3 years later, giving an after thouhgt, I would hold more suspicion on some of the arguments. Nevertheless, a fun book
I have only read the introduction and the first chapter which is most related to architecture. He's made convincing statements of a new philosophical altitude towards history. Also, De Landa's text is a perfect example to learn academic writing.
2 有用 城市笔记人 2008-10-16 11:50:04
I read the whole book page to page, even managed to translate two chapters of the book. Very Deleuzian. 2 or 3 years later, giving an after thouhgt, I would hold more suspicion on some of the arguments. Nevertheless, a fun book
0 有用 盈盈 2015-09-22 04:36:56
I have only read the introduction and the first chapter which is most related to architecture. He's made convincing statements of a new philosophical altitude towards history. Also, De Landa's text is a perfect example to learn academic writing.
1 有用 Shaw 2014-08-28 16:30:30
其实只读了语言部分, 其他的读不进去。语言部分还是挺好看的
0 有用 菲苾卡夫卡 2017-12-10 21:40:53
就是一锅大杂碎。
0 有用 脑阿姨 2012-11-04 15:13:11
只怪智商不够
0 有用 acid 2023-07-13 16:55:35 上海
初读,underwhelmingly puzzled
0 有用 Portia Charney 2023-07-31 01:04:14 广东
导的书借来看的 难懂绝对不是英文的问题
0 有用 InIn 2024-08-26 14:28:48 广东
好美
0 有用 曳尾.avi 2020-02-27 13:20:28
有种挺好玩也挺闲啊的感觉
0 有用 舒窈 2021-12-30 05:28:51
补标。AA DRL - Reading as Research 推荐书目。读完的感觉是可以帮助我们理解为什么材料是可计算的,为什么参数化可以和建筑以及建筑材料结合在一起。
0 有用 Xx 2018-11-22 01:54:25
像是小时候第一次看哈利波特的感觉
0 有用 嘎飞耳朵 2018-09-10 17:15:07
感觉读了一个发散思维的叨叨叨,冗长的章节始于一个还算清晰的开头,然后就不断发散,这一下那一下的,最后再圆回来。主线是物质能量世界的两种构成模式相互影响、动态共存,不断“相变”而非单线程递进的非线性历史,但真的缠绕太多细碎的内容进去了,读者还得不断提醒自己注意重点,看着真累。
0 有用 DrLeeChangSoo 2024-09-10 03:34:00 加拿大
对生态学的运用出神入化