No one has been more influential in the contemporary practice of art history than Erwin Panofsky, yet many of his early seminal papers remain virtually unknown to art historians. As a result, Michael Ann Holly maintains, art historians today do not have access to the full range of methodological considerations and possibilities that Panofsky's thought offers, and they often rem...
No one has been more influential in the contemporary practice of art history than Erwin Panofsky, yet many of his early seminal papers remain virtually unknown to art historians. As a result, Michael Ann Holly maintains, art historians today do not have access to the full range of methodological considerations and possibilities that Panofsky's thought offers, and they often remain unaware of the significant role art history played in the development of modern humanistic thought. Placing Panofsky's theoretical work first in the context of the major historical paradigms generated by Hegel, Burckhardt, and Dilthey, Holly shows how these paradigms themselves became the grounds for creative controversy among Panofsky's predecessors Riegl, Wolfflin, Warburg, and Dvorak, among others. She also discusses how Panofsky's struggle with the terms and concepts of neo-Kantianism produced in his work remarkable parallels with the philosophy of Ernst Cassirer. Finally, she evaluates Panofsky's better known and later "iconological" studies by reading them against the earlier essays and by comparing his earlier ideas with the vision that has inspired recent work in the philosophy of history, semiotics, and the philosophy of science."
－
Paperback, 272 pages
Published February 6th 2015 by Cornell University Press (first published December 1984)
Original Title: Panofsky and the Foundations of Art History
迈克尔·安·霍利 作者
1 有用 不验证不让胡说 2011-01-11 00:19:16
requires re-reading at a later date, perhaps in conjunction with Podro and et cetera.
0 有用 SHAW的黏土磚 2013-02-05 22:19:55
是本好书。让我兢兢战战地通读过后明白了两点：对panofsky理论的理解远没有自己想象的那样深入；第二点，正是因为如此，对之的运用没有夸张到过度阐释的地步，大体上样子还过得去。
0 有用 :D 2022-01-04 19:33:35
第二章写潘氏与沃尔夫林尤好，导言的介绍也切中要害。后几章写卡西尔有点泛泛。是了解潘氏早年学术背景的好材料。
0 有用 𝑾𝒂𝒍𝒅𝒆𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒂𝒎𝒌𝒆𝒊𝒕 2021-09-07 14:13:47
友情四星。不可否认，此书是关于潘诺夫斯基的重要论著，但阅读体验确实一言难尽。前三章（论黑格尔布克哈特狄尔泰、论沃尔夫林、论李格尔）的条理还算清晰，给人启发也大，值回部分票价。但越到后面，越暴露出Holly的问题：逻辑过于缠绕，导致失去焦点，流于散漫杂乱。尤其是论卡西尔一章，本可以写得异常精彩，《透视》一文亦大有挖掘空间，结果远不如Wood的英译本前言来得切中要害。最后一章更懒得说了，根本就是不知所... 友情四星。不可否认，此书是关于潘诺夫斯基的重要论著，但阅读体验确实一言难尽。前三章（论黑格尔布克哈特狄尔泰、论沃尔夫林、论李格尔）的条理还算清晰，给人启发也大，值回部分票价。但越到后面，越暴露出Holly的问题：逻辑过于缠绕，导致失去焦点，流于散漫杂乱。尤其是论卡西尔一章，本可以写得异常精彩，《透视》一文亦大有挖掘空间，结果远不如Wood的英译本前言来得切中要害。最后一章更懒得说了，根本就是不知所云。果然，还是我的期望值太高了吗。 (展开)
0 有用 huck 2014-04-22 09:23:37
面对图像时代，我们越来越有必要重拾大潘神的理论武器了。德玛西亚！