This best-selling, concise, inexpensive text offers a clear, lively introduction of the major philosophical theories of morality, explaining why each theory has been accepted by some thinkers but rejected by others. It is widely used not only in Introduction to Ethics courses, but also in Biomedical Ethics and Business Ethics courses as a brief, affordable text for the ethical ...
This best-selling, concise, inexpensive text offers a clear, lively introduction of the major philosophical theories of morality, explaining why each theory has been accepted by some thinkers but rejected by others. It is widely used not only in Introduction to Ethics courses, but also in Biomedical Ethics and Business Ethics courses as a brief, affordable text for the ethical theory portion of those courses. To illustrate the theories, and to reveal their implications, important current issues such as abortion, euthanasia, the treatment of non-human animals, and famine relief are discussed in depth. With the third edition comes a new chapter on feminist ethics and new sections on Baby Theresa and Tracy Latimer (chapter 1), how one could justify saying that the practices of another culture are wrong with female genital mutilation as the example used (chapter 2), whether it is possible to prove that ethical judgments are true or false (chapter 3), and whether utilitarianism is too demanding (chapter 8). The section on Natural Law has been rewritten to include a fuller description of Aristotle's world-view with a discussion of Aristotle's world view versus modern science (chapter 4). There is a smoother introduction to chapter 11 with The Prisoner's Dilemma described more clearly.
作者简介
· · · · · ·
作者简介
作者:(美国)斯图亚特·雷切尔斯 (Stuart Rachels) 译者:杨宗元
詹姆斯·雷切尔斯(James Rachels,1941-2003)亚拉巴马大学伯明翰分校哲学教授。著有《生命的终点:安乐死与道德》(The End Of Life:Euthanasia and Morality,1986)、《由动物创生——达尔文主义的道德意义》(Created from Animals:The Moral Implications of Darwinism,1990)、《哲学的问题》(Problems from Philosophy,2005)、《伦理学能够提供答案吗》(Can Ethics Provide Answers,1997)。
the fundamental mistake in the cultural differences argument is that it attempts to derive a substantive conclusion about a subject from the mere fact that people disagree about it. (查看原文)
第11章/读到马丁路德金那部分还是有被燃到。人类社会对不公平的观念以及制度的反抗,正是因为有了这些人的勇气和长期以来斗争才得以实现。想起我之前在看到刘擎教授愤愤地说出“让这个世界所有不好的option都消失”(BTW.后来这句话还被薛郎公开“讽”了一下)这句话的时候还在心里“嘲笑”他的不“入世”和象牙塔待久了的天真。可是现在更多的是shame on myself吧。好像没有人不会被“英雄”感动,但...第11章/读到马丁路德金那部分还是有被燃到。人类社会对不公平的观念以及制度的反抗,正是因为有了这些人的勇气和长期以来斗争才得以实现。想起我之前在看到刘擎教授愤愤地说出“让这个世界所有不好的option都消失”(BTW.后来这句话还被薛郎公开“讽”了一下)这句话的时候还在心里“嘲笑”他的不“入世”和象牙塔待久了的天真。可是现在更多的是shame on myself吧。好像没有人不会被“英雄”感动,但真到了自己要牺牲点啥的时候,却也不情不愿。即便这种“牺牲”经过漫长的时间,最后真的是有价值的也不行,因为谁都不想烧自己的寿命为系统/整体谋利,即便自己也在整体之中。说一千道一万,终于还是陷入囚徒困境。燃的情绪不出半小时就蔫了。想来,无非就是廉价的快消式情绪罢了。(展开)
0 有用 树眠 2024-04-09 23:39:23 加拿大
伦理学的入门教材,涵盖了大多数点,也不难读,书中的例子也很有趣,好书呀。
0 有用 立在青左 2022-06-15 04:44:37
The challenge of cultural relativism.
0 有用 Secondfiddle 2021-03-03 22:48:47
第11章/读到马丁路德金那部分还是有被燃到。人类社会对不公平的观念以及制度的反抗,正是因为有了这些人的勇气和长期以来斗争才得以实现。想起我之前在看到刘擎教授愤愤地说出“让这个世界所有不好的option都消失”(BTW.后来这句话还被薛郎公开“讽”了一下)这句话的时候还在心里“嘲笑”他的不“入世”和象牙塔待久了的天真。可是现在更多的是shame on myself吧。好像没有人不会被“英雄”感动,但... 第11章/读到马丁路德金那部分还是有被燃到。人类社会对不公平的观念以及制度的反抗,正是因为有了这些人的勇气和长期以来斗争才得以实现。想起我之前在看到刘擎教授愤愤地说出“让这个世界所有不好的option都消失”(BTW.后来这句话还被薛郎公开“讽”了一下)这句话的时候还在心里“嘲笑”他的不“入世”和象牙塔待久了的天真。可是现在更多的是shame on myself吧。好像没有人不会被“英雄”感动,但真到了自己要牺牲点啥的时候,却也不情不愿。即便这种“牺牲”经过漫长的时间,最后真的是有价值的也不行,因为谁都不想烧自己的寿命为系统/整体谋利,即便自己也在整体之中。说一千道一万,终于还是陷入囚徒困境。燃的情绪不出半小时就蔫了。想来,无非就是廉价的快消式情绪罢了。 (展开)
0 有用 江潋江袭明 2023-10-22 07:45:31 北京
补标。 暑假小学期伦理学教材,入门还行。
0 有用 温柔的食肉动物 2020-03-09 11:25:29
哲学课上的reading 入门