作者:
Albert O. Hirschman 出版社: Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 副标题: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States 出版年: 1970-1-1 页数: 176 定价: USD 27.00 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780674276604
An innovator in contemporary thought on economic and political development looks here at decline rather than growth. Albert O. Hirschman makes a basic distinction between alternative ways of reacting to deterioration in business firms and, in general, to dissatisfaction with organizations: one, "exit," is for the member to quit the organization or for the customer to switch to ...
An innovator in contemporary thought on economic and political development looks here at decline rather than growth. Albert O. Hirschman makes a basic distinction between alternative ways of reacting to deterioration in business firms and, in general, to dissatisfaction with organizations: one, "exit," is for the member to quit the organization or for the customer to switch to the competing product, and the other, "voice," is for members or customers to agitate and exert influence for change "from within." The efficiency of the competitive mechanism, with its total reliance on exit, is questioned for certain important situations. As exit often undercuts voice while being unable to counteract decline, loyalty is seen in the function of retarding exit and of permitting voice to play its proper role. The interplay of the three concepts turns out to illuminate a wide range of economic, social, and political phenomena. As the author states in the preface, "having found my own unifying way of looking at issues as diverse as competition and the two-party system, divorce and the American character, black power and the failure of 'unhappy' top officials to resign over Vietnam, I decided to let myself go a little."
作者简介
· · · · · ·
Albert O. Hirschman was Professor of Social Science, Emeritus, at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, following a career of prestigious appointments, honors, and awards. Perhaps the most widely known and admired of his many books are Exit, Voice, and Loyalty and The Passions and the Interests (Princeton).
目录
· · · · · ·
1. Introduction and Doctrinal Background
Enter “exit” and “voice”
Latitude for deterioration, and slack in economic thought
Exit and voice as impersonations of economics and politics
2. Exit
How the exit option works
· · · · · ·
(更多)
1. Introduction and Doctrinal Background
Enter “exit” and “voice”
Latitude for deterioration, and slack in economic thought
Exit and voice as impersonations of economics and politics
2. Exit
How the exit option works
Competition as collusive behavior
3. Voice
Voice as a residual of exit
Voice as an alternative to exit
4. A Special Difficulty in Combining Exit and Voice
5. How Monopoly Can Be Comforted by Competition
6. On Spatial Duopoly and the Dynamics of Two-Party Systems
7. A Theory of Loyalty
The activation of voice as a function of loyalty
Loyalist behavior as modified by severe initiation and high penalties for exit
Loyalty and the difficult exit from public goods (and evils)
8. Exit and Voice in American Ideology and Practice
9. The Elusive Optimal Mix of Exit and Voice
Appendixes
A. A simple diagrammatic representation of voice and exit
B. The choice between voice and exit
C. The reversal phenomenon
D. Consumer reactions to price rise and quality decline in the case of several connoisseur goods
E. The effects of severity of initiation on activism: design for an experiment (in collaboration with Philip G. Zimbardo and Mark Snyder)
Index
· · · · · · (收起)
这句话是今天下午在图书馆看Albert O. Hirschman的Exit, Voice, and Loyalty的时候想到的。 前段时间在吴国光老师家闲扯淡的时候他讲到这本书很有意思,我就特地找来看。这书本来是写给经济学家的,副标题是responses to decline in Firms, Organizations, and the State. ...
(展开)
1 有用 immersonst 2012-11-14 12:15:24
喜欢~
1 有用 makzhou 2020-10-24 20:57:33
很多年后重新读这本书,反而觉得不如初时那么优雅,但作为理解组织的佳作,还是很推荐。
1 有用 暮兮云 2021-03-30 09:45:35
晚期资本主义社会中,太容易的exit看似创造很多选择,其实可能选什么都一样烂;不完全的公共部门改革中,exit系统性地优于voice,资源大量向私人部门逃逸,公共部门烂而不倒;灯塔主义调子太高,以道德的力量阻却exit、强迫voice,容易认知失调撕裂社会;聪明的威权主义禁止voice的同时选择性地开放exit,将最vocal的异议者排除到边界之外。好的理论就是,在写成后五十年后的世界中依然像影子... 晚期资本主义社会中,太容易的exit看似创造很多选择,其实可能选什么都一样烂;不完全的公共部门改革中,exit系统性地优于voice,资源大量向私人部门逃逸,公共部门烂而不倒;灯塔主义调子太高,以道德的力量阻却exit、强迫voice,容易认知失调撕裂社会;聪明的威权主义禁止voice的同时选择性地开放exit,将最vocal的异议者排除到边界之外。好的理论就是,在写成后五十年后的世界中依然像影子一样无处不在。 (展开)
1 有用 林中空地 2013-06-21 16:25:44
a theory of loyalty
0 有用 Lane 2022-11-17 01:15:19 北京
对照中文读的,虽然我认为赫希曼还是过于经济学理性人,但是,不能否认,这个模型在转化到现实中时,具有深刻洞察力。能激发一堆反驳它的东西,也是一种理论的生命力
0 有用 Lane 2022-11-17 01:15:19 北京
对照中文读的,虽然我认为赫希曼还是过于经济学理性人,但是,不能否认,这个模型在转化到现实中时,具有深刻洞察力。能激发一堆反驳它的东西,也是一种理论的生命力
0 有用 刺猬猬四五六 2022-11-14 16:17:16 北京
Hirschman! 我最爱的经济学家!
1 有用 xxxxwulala 2022-09-11 14:20:58 北京
其实只给四星半,详见书评。
1 有用 辰 2022-05-26 03:41:55
Exit 和 voice 做为顾客、成员的两种选择手段,在不同的组织里使用的效果也有差异;而组织若要防止溃败,如何善用这两种手段来获取loyalty ?P.S.英文原版比中译本更清晰简洁
1 有用 LumosObliviate 2022-04-10 12:40:48
人类思想的光辉不因时间而褪色