From a Pulitzer Prize–winning investigative reporter at The New York Times comes the explosive story of the rise of the processed food industry and its link to the emerging obesity epidemic. Michael Moss reveals how companies use salt, sugar, and fat to addict us and, more important, how we can fight back.
From a Pulitzer Prize–winning investigative reporter at The New York Times comes the explosive story of the rise of the processed food industry and its link to the emerging obesity epidemic. Michael Moss reveals how companies use salt, sugar, and fat to addict us and, more important, how we can fight back.
In the spring of 1999 the heads of the world’s largest processed food companies—from Coca-Cola to Nabisco—gathered at Pillsbury headquarters in Minneapolis for a secret meeting. On the agenda: the emerging epidemic of obesity, and what to do about it.
Increasingly, the salt-, sugar-, and fat-laden foods these companies produced were being linked to obesity, and a concerned Kraft executive took the stage to issue a warning: There would be a day of reckoning unless changes were made. This executive then launched into a damning PowerPoint presentation—114 slides in all—making the case that processed food companies could not afford to sit by, idle, as children grew sick and class-action lawyers lurked. To deny the problem, he said, is to court disaster.
When he was done, the most powerful person in the room—the CEO of General Mills—stood up to speak, clearly annoyed. And by the time he sat down, the meeting was over.
Since that day, with the industry in pursuit of its win-at-all-costs strategy, the situation has only grown more dire.Every year, the average American eats thirty-three pounds of cheese (triple what we ate in 1970) and seventy pounds of sugar (about twenty-two teaspoons a day). We ingest 8,500 milligrams of salt a day, double the recommended amount, and almost none of that comes from the shakers on our table. It comes from processed food. It’s no wonder, then, that one in three adults, and one in five kids, is clinically obese. It’s no wonder that twenty-six million Americans have diabetes, the processed food industry in the U.S. accounts for $1 trillion a year in sales, and the total economic cost of this health crisis is approaching $300 billion a year.
In Salt Sugar Fat, Pulitzer Prize–winning investigative reporter Michael Moss shows how we got here. Featuring examples from some of the most recognizable (and profitable) companies and brands of the last half century—including Kraft, Coca-Cola, Lunchables, Kellogg, Nestlé, Oreos, Cargill, Capri Sun, and many more—Moss’s explosive, empowering narrative is grounded in meticulous, often eye-opening research.
Moss takes us inside the labs where food scientists use cutting-edge technology to calculate the “bliss point” of sugary beverages or enhance the “mouthfeel” of fat by manipulating its chemical structure. He unearths marketing campaigns designed—in a technique adapted from tobacco companies—to redirect concerns about the health risks of their products: Dial back on one ingredient, pump up the other two, and tout the new line as “fat-free” or “low-salt.” He talks to concerned executives who confess that they could never produce truly healthy alternatives to their products even if serious regulation became a reality. Simply put: The industry itself would cease to exist without salt, sugar, and fat. Just as millions of “heavy users”—as the companies refer to their most ardent customers—are addicted to this seductive trio, so too are the companies that peddle them. You will never look at a nutrition label the same way again.
“As a feat of reporting and a public service, Salt Sugar Fat is a remarkable accomplishment.”— The New York Times Book Review
0 有用 Parano 2018-06-17 10:36:03
Err
2 有用 VV和VV 2016-01-25 08:15:22
写的太墨迹了
3 有用 庄常飞 2013-07-11 09:07:46
好的地方:对食物和食物公司的描述很多细节,不少事实触目惊心。坏的地方:作者是一个超级糟糕的叙事者,内容结构乱七八糟,这可能和他是记者、只能写短文有关。
0 有用 Stellarator 2020-12-25 15:22:56
你美奇观集锦
0 有用 sfjf 2023-01-19 09:18:23 美国
第一次看如此贴近生活的non-fiction,感觉还挺有意思的。一些想法:1)我们现在能够读到这些,是因为这些上世纪和21世纪初加工食品大亨的时代正在落幕,大环境下人们的消费观念也已经有了转变。那现在正在发生的呢?似乎人们对所有新事物的理解都很有后置性。2)市场经济之下造出各种商品,或许损害了公共健康、但这些商人和发明者是纯粹的恶人吗?(我认为更接近Hannah Arendt所说的”thought... 第一次看如此贴近生活的non-fiction,感觉还挺有意思的。一些想法:1)我们现在能够读到这些,是因为这些上世纪和21世纪初加工食品大亨的时代正在落幕,大环境下人们的消费观念也已经有了转变。那现在正在发生的呢?似乎人们对所有新事物的理解都很有后置性。2)市场经济之下造出各种商品,或许损害了公共健康、但这些商人和发明者是纯粹的恶人吗?(我认为更接近Hannah Arendt所说的”thoughtlessness”) 新的科技起初总是让人兴奋的,商人发掘消费者的需求、逐利似乎也无可厚非。人类总是在发明他们无法控制的东西。 (展开)