作者:
Soren Kierkegaard 出版社: Penguin Classics 副标题: Dialectical Lyric by Johannes de Silentio 原作名: Frygt og Bæven. Dialektisk Lyrik af Johannes de Silentio 译者:
Alastair Hannay 出版年: 1986-1-7 页数: 160 定价: USD 15.00 装帧: Paperback 丛书:Penguin Classics ISBN: 9780140444490
Writing under the pseudonym of Johannes de silentio, Kierkegaard uses the form of a dialectical lyric to present his conception of faith. Abraham is portrayed as a great man, who chose to sacrifice his son, Isaac, in the face of conflicting expectations and in defiance of any conceivable ethical standard. The infamous and controversial 'teleological suspension of the ethical' c...
Writing under the pseudonym of Johannes de silentio, Kierkegaard uses the form of a dialectical lyric to present his conception of faith. Abraham is portrayed as a great man, who chose to sacrifice his son, Isaac, in the face of conflicting expectations and in defiance of any conceivable ethical standard. The infamous and controversial 'teleological suspension of the ethical' challenged the contemporary views of Hegel's universal moral system, and the suffering individual must alone make a choice 'on the strength of the absurd'. Kierkegaard's writings have inspired both modern Protestant theology and existentialism.
Penguin Classics (共1145册),
这套丛书还有
《Little Red Riding Hood, Cinderella, and Other Classic Fairy Tales of Charles Perrault》,《The Man Who Had All the Luck》,《Selected Poetry》,《Five Children and It》,《Fragments》 等。
Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling is a provocative study of the story of Abraham’s attempt to sacrifice Isaac. It highlights the most serious ethical-religious conflicts in human existence—what is condemned as murder in the ethical realm can be praised as...
(展开)
The Unspeakable Time of Fear and Trembling Thank God. I’m glad that I took a second read of this book. Reading Fear and Trembling is more than an intellectual activity. Kierkegaard requires the readers to empathise with him as he did with Abraham to embody...
(展开)
There was once a man, he had learned as a child that beautiful tale of how God tried Abraham, how he withstood the test, kept his faith and for the second time received a son against every expectation. When he became older he read the same story with even greater admiration, for life had divided what had been united in the child’s pious simplicity. The older he became the more often his though...
2020-01-26 17:032人喜欢
There was once a man, he had learned as a child that beautiful tale of how God tried Abraham, how he withstood the test, kept his faith and for the second time received a son against every expectation. When he became older he read the same story with even greater admiration, for life had divided what had been united in the child’s pious simplicity. The older he became the more often his thoughts turned to that tale, his enthusiasm became stronger and stronger, and yet less and less could he understand it. Finally it put everything else out of his mind; his soul had but one wish, actually to see Abraham, and one longing, to have been witness to those events. It was not the beautiful regions of the East, nor the earthly splendour of the Promised Land, he longed to see, not the God-fearing couple whose old age God had blessed, not the venerable figure of the patriarch stricken in years, not the youthful vigour God gave to Isaac - it would have been the same if it had taken place on a barren heath. What he yearned for was to accompany them on the three-day journey, when Abraham rode with grief before him and Isaac by his side. He wanted to be there at that moment when Abraham raised his eyes and saw in the distance the mountain in Moriah, the moment he left the asses behind and went on up the mountain alone with Isaac. For what occupied him was not the finely wrought fabric of imagination, but the shudder of thought.引自第44页
This passage from the Attunement alone stands as one of the finest manifestos of existentialism.
Whatever one generation learns from another, it can never learn from a predecessor the genuinely human factor. In this respect, every generation begins afresh, has no task other than that of any previous generation, and comes no further, provided the latter didn't shirk its task amd deceive itself. This authentically human factor is passion, in which the one generation also fully understands th...
2020-01-30 10:41
Whatever one generation learns from another, it can never learn from a predecessor the genuinely human factor. In this respect, every generation begins afresh, has no task other than that of any previous generation, and comes no further, provided the latter didn't shirk its task amd deceive itself. This authentically human factor is passion, in which the one generation also fully understands the other and understands itself. Thus no generaton has learned from another how to love, no generation can begin other than at the beginning, the task of no later generation is shorter than its predecessor’s, and if someone, unlike the previous generation, is unwilling to stay with love but wants to go further, then that is simply idle and foolish talk.引自第145页
The difference between the tragic hero and Abraham is obvious enough. The tragic hero stays within the ethical. He lets an expression of the ethical have its telos in a higher expression of the ethical; he reduces the ethical relation between father and son, or daughter and father, to a sentiment that has its dialectic in its relation to the idea of the ethical life. Here, then, there can be no...
2020-01-28 10:22
The difference between the tragic hero and Abraham is obvious enough. The tragic hero stays within the ethical. He lets an expression of the ethical have its telos in a higher expression of the ethical; he reduces the ethical relation between father and son, or daughter and father, to a sentiment that has its dialectic in its relation to the idea of the ethical life. Here, then, there can be no question of a teleological suspension of the ethical itself.引自第87页With Abraham it is different. In his action he overstepped the ethical altogether, and had a higher telos outside it, in relation to which he suspended it.引自第88页
Whatever one generation learns from another, it can never learn from a predecessor the genuinely human factor. In this respect, every generation begins afresh, has no task other than that of any previous generation, and comes no further, provided the latter didn't shirk its task amd deceive itself. This authentically human factor is passion, in which the one generation also fully understands th...
2020-01-30 10:41
Whatever one generation learns from another, it can never learn from a predecessor the genuinely human factor. In this respect, every generation begins afresh, has no task other than that of any previous generation, and comes no further, provided the latter didn't shirk its task amd deceive itself. This authentically human factor is passion, in which the one generation also fully understands the other and understands itself. Thus no generaton has learned from another how to love, no generation can begin other than at the beginning, the task of no later generation is shorter than its predecessor’s, and if someone, unlike the previous generation, is unwilling to stay with love but wants to go further, then that is simply idle and foolish talk.引自第145页
The difference between the tragic hero and Abraham is obvious enough. The tragic hero stays within the ethical. He lets an expression of the ethical have its telos in a higher expression of the ethical; he reduces the ethical relation between father and son, or daughter and father, to a sentiment that has its dialectic in its relation to the idea of the ethical life. Here, then, there can be no...
2020-01-28 10:22
The difference between the tragic hero and Abraham is obvious enough. The tragic hero stays within the ethical. He lets an expression of the ethical have its telos in a higher expression of the ethical; he reduces the ethical relation between father and son, or daughter and father, to a sentiment that has its dialectic in its relation to the idea of the ethical life. Here, then, there can be no question of a teleological suspension of the ethical itself.引自第87页With Abraham it is different. In his action he overstepped the ethical altogether, and had a higher telos outside it, in relation to which he suspended it.引自第88页
Whatever one generation learns from another, it can never learn from a predecessor the genuinely human factor. In this respect, every generation begins afresh, has no task other than that of any previous generation, and comes no further, provided the latter didn't shirk its task amd deceive itself. This authentically human factor is passion, in which the one generation also fully understands th...
2020-01-30 10:41
Whatever one generation learns from another, it can never learn from a predecessor the genuinely human factor. In this respect, every generation begins afresh, has no task other than that of any previous generation, and comes no further, provided the latter didn't shirk its task amd deceive itself. This authentically human factor is passion, in which the one generation also fully understands the other and understands itself. Thus no generaton has learned from another how to love, no generation can begin other than at the beginning, the task of no later generation is shorter than its predecessor’s, and if someone, unlike the previous generation, is unwilling to stay with love but wants to go further, then that is simply idle and foolish talk.引自第145页
The difference between the tragic hero and Abraham is obvious enough. The tragic hero stays within the ethical. He lets an expression of the ethical have its telos in a higher expression of the ethical; he reduces the ethical relation between father and son, or daughter and father, to a sentiment that has its dialectic in its relation to the idea of the ethical life. Here, then, there can be no...
2020-01-28 10:22
The difference between the tragic hero and Abraham is obvious enough. The tragic hero stays within the ethical. He lets an expression of the ethical have its telos in a higher expression of the ethical; he reduces the ethical relation between father and son, or daughter and father, to a sentiment that has its dialectic in its relation to the idea of the ethical life. Here, then, there can be no question of a teleological suspension of the ethical itself.引自第87页With Abraham it is different. In his action he overstepped the ethical altogether, and had a higher telos outside it, in relation to which he suspended it.引自第88页
清愁
贵州人民出版社1994版
源二爷
华夏出版社1999版
点点
华夏出版社2013版
MiracleGD
贵州人民出版社1994版
塵月🌒
华夏出版社2017版
Lichtung
孔默
华夏出版社2017版
2 有用 Lichtung 2020-01-31
重读一遍，泪流满面。果然上学的时候啥都不懂。信仰不是爱，不是美，不是星辰大海。信仰是转身背向全世界，是弃绝尘世的一切，是遁入不可言说之深处。信仰什么都不是，正因为如此，它超越了人，超越了万物的尺度，从恐惧与战栗的肉体里纵身跃出，成为绝对虚无中，只有你看得见的光。
0 有用 ste 2016-12-20
Kierkegaard is the other half of my soul!
0 有用 劣质以太 2021-03-14
The Shrinking Lonesome Sestina
0 有用 MellonCollie 2020-03-03
All you need to do is take a leap of faith. 以这激情爱着激情。
0 有用 里德尔 2020-03-15
某种意义上，和搏击俱乐部可能是一个故事。上帝是亚伯拉罕的泰勒·德顿。
0 有用 susan 2021-09-15
这个文字太晦涩了，感觉是个模仿圣经语言的精分的碎碎念。 notes；献祭是信仰，是个人的，保护儿子是伦理的，是群体的。作者认为个人性大于集体性（大概？），以及克尔凯郭尔将基督徒分为了无限放弃骑士（放弃伦理自我，放弃普遍性的基督徒）和信仰骑士（相信上帝的允诺，相信上帝不会拿走一切，相信自己凭借信仰可以重新得到一切的基督徒）两类。
0 有用 劣质以太 2021-03-14
The Shrinking Lonesome Sestina
0 有用 moormoorer 2021-03-06
大學時讀東西太急了；Johannes de silentio當然不是安靜的。
0 有用 （已隐身） 2021-02-18
有信仰的挣扎于自己与信仰，没信仰的挣扎于自己与无信仰，夹在中间的人更是虚无的挣扎，没有人逃得掉。成为一个虔诚的教徒好歹有一个永恒的课题……
0 有用 盗火者Howell 2021-01-19
Problema III特别棒，与Derrida的"The Gift of Death"对读极有意思。