Annamarie Jagose knows that queer theory did not spring full- blown from the head of any contemporary theorist. It is the outcome of many different influences and sources, including the homophile movement, gay liberation, and lesbian feminism. In pointing to the history of queer theory--a history that all too often is ignored or elided--Jagose performs a valuable service.--Henr...
Annamarie Jagose knows that queer theory did not spring full- blown from the head of any contemporary theorist. It is the outcome of many different influences and sources, including the homophile movement, gay liberation, and lesbian feminism. In pointing to the history of queer theory--a history that all too often is ignored or elided--Jagose performs a valuable service.--Henry Abelove, co-editor of The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader
The political and academic appropriation of the term queer over the last several years has marked a shift in the study of sexuality from a focus on supposedly essential categories as gay and lesbian to more fluid or queer notions of sexual identity. Yet queer is a category still in the process of formation. In Queer Theory, Annamarie Jagose provides a clear and concise explanation of queer theory, tracing it as part of an intriguing history of same-sex love over the last century.
Blending insights from prominent theorists such as Judith Butler and David Halperin, Jagose argues that queer theory's challenge is to create new ways of thinking, not only about fixed sexual identities such as heterosexual and homosexual, but also about other supposedly essential notions such as sexuality and gender and even man and woman.
Queer is also productively informed by lesbian feminism in three crucial respects: its attention to the specificity og gender; its framing of sexuality as institutional rather than personal, and its critique of compulsory hetersexuality (查看原文)
Nationally and internationally, gay liberation was neither a monolithic nor even an entirely coherent social movement. It was organised around analyses of the structures of lesbian and gay oppression, and how such oppression might be overcome. Homosexuality was represented as an identity repressed by heterosexist power structures which privilege gender-asymmetry, sexual reproduction and the patriarchal nuclear family. Unlike the homophile
movement, gay liberation theorised that the system would never be radically transformed by those who were invested in it.
Dominant formulations of sex and gender categories (and the institutions which supported them) would be eradicated only by gay men and lesbians who, refusing to accept their subaltern status, would destroy the system through literal a... (查看原文)
0 有用 L.M.S 2021-07-23 10:49:37
酷儿理论入门很好的书，但如果没有相关知识基础，一下子看英文书可能有些难度。
0 有用 电胆马 2024-11-06 02:07:05 加拿大
Jagose, Annamarie. 1996. “Limits of Identity” Pp. 58-71 and “Queer” Pp. 72-100
2 有用 咸浣熊 2021-09-19 21:55:15
编年史和关键词都兼顾到。流水的酷儿理论，铁打的福柯（权力不是压迫而是生产性的，和德勒兹相会）和巴特勒（操演不是表演，不是穿上一件衣服那么简单）。行为/身份的两分、建构论也可以恐同、从乞求认同到身份政治、改良和运动、女同的隐身（身份嵌套的两难）与显现（赋予性别而非性取向优先权重）、贴合当下的姐妹/男人话语和国家主义酷儿.....酷儿理论、女性主义和后殖民等20世纪理论很多都是“拿来主义”的，面对现实... 编年史和关键词都兼顾到。流水的酷儿理论，铁打的福柯（权力不是压迫而是生产性的，和德勒兹相会）和巴特勒（操演不是表演，不是穿上一件衣服那么简单）。行为/身份的两分、建构论也可以恐同、从乞求认同到身份政治、改良和运动、女同的隐身（身份嵌套的两难）与显现（赋予性别而非性取向优先权重）、贴合当下的姐妹/男人话语和国家主义酷儿.....酷儿理论、女性主义和后殖民等20世纪理论很多都是“拿来主义”的，面对现实状况直接摘取近两个世纪的理论，因此模糊性和效力之间有张力。本书罗列的各种对酷儿理论的批评都太实在，反驳的底气都很弱。去批判“理所应当”是很可贵，只是身份和任何知识型一样有其必要的界限（看到能解释什么不能解释什么），试图挪用出一个没有排他性的术语，拼凑碎片去囊括一切是很徒劳而且容易被收编的。 (展开)
3 有用 Cory 2016-04-24 18:45:56
简明实用的入门书，编年史写法很适合初学者，梳理了酷儿理论的前身及发展，也提示了历时与共时层面的复杂牵连，如果联系到晚近关于时间性的讨论来看，大概是酷儿理论自身的queer asynchronies。不过毕竟是二十年前的书，新议题可参考Routledge的读本。
0 有用 Lucien在昂古莱 2022-01-30 10:33:14
很实用的入门教材