作者:
Tzvetan Todorov 出版社: Cornell University Press 副标题: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre 译者:
Richard Howard 出版年: 1975-5 页数: 180 定价: USD 16.95 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780801491467
In The Fantastic, Tzvetan Todorov seeks to examine both generic theory and a particular genre, moving back and forth between a poetics of the fantastic itself and a metapoetics or theory of theorizing, even as he suggest that one must, as a critic, move back and forth between theory and history, between idea and fact. His work on the fantastic is indeed about a historical pheno...
In The Fantastic, Tzvetan Todorov seeks to examine both generic theory and a particular genre, moving back and forth between a poetics of the fantastic itself and a metapoetics or theory of theorizing, even as he suggest that one must, as a critic, move back and forth between theory and history, between idea and fact. His work on the fantastic is indeed about a historical phenomenon that we recognize, about specific works that we may read, but it is also about the use and abuse of generic theory.
As an essay in fictional poetics, The Fantastic is consciously structuralist in its approach to the generic subject. Todorov seeks linguistic bases for the structural features he notes in a variety of fantastic texts, including Potocki's The Sargasso Manuscript, Nerval's Aurélia, Balzac's The Magic Skin, the Arabian Nights, Cazotte's Le Diable Amoureux, Kafka's The Metamorphosis, and tales by E. T. A. Hoffman, Charles Perrault, Guy de Maupassant, Nicolai Gogol, and Edgar A. Poe.
作者简介
· · · · · ·
Tzvetan Todorov is Director of Research at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique in Paris. A native of Bulgaria living in France for over four decades, he is among the most influential literary and cultural theorists writing today. Among his many books available in English translation are Theories of the Symbol and Symbolism and Interpretation, both available from Co...
Tzvetan Todorov is Director of Research at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique in Paris. A native of Bulgaria living in France for over four decades, he is among the most influential literary and cultural theorists writing today. Among his many books available in English translation are Theories of the Symbol and Symbolism and Interpretation, both available from Cornell.
目录
· · · · · ·
Foreword, by Robert Scholes
1. Literary Genres
2. Definition of the Fantastic
3. The Uncanny and the Marvelous
4. Poetry and Allegory
5. Discourse of the Fantastic
· · · · · ·
(更多)
Foreword, by Robert Scholes
1. Literary Genres
2. Definition of the Fantastic
3. The Uncanny and the Marvelous
4. Poetry and Allegory
5. Discourse of the Fantastic
6. Themes of the Fantastic: Introduction
7. Themes of the Self
8. Themes of the Other
9. Themes of the Fantastic: Conclusion
10. Literature and the Fantastic
Index
· · · · · · (收起)
Celle-là même par quoi Frye s'oppose nettement à l'attitue structuraliste, se rattachant plutôt à une tradition où l'on peut ranger les noms de Jung Bachelard ou Gibert Durand (si différentes que soient leurs œvures). (查看原文)
逻辑结构特别清楚，一上来就划分了阵营，荣格巴什拉弗莱都被划到了结构主义的对立面。终章提到巴塔耶 Le bleu du ciel：Todorov认为Gautier当年不敢写（只敢遮遮掩掩的靠吸血鬼绕弯表达）的恋尸癖情节今天巴大爷敢明目张胆的写出来是因为psychoanalysis的诞生。换言之，今天的psychoanalysis已经取代了当年Fantastique的社会功能。末章讨论《变形记》极好。...逻辑结构特别清楚，一上来就划分了阵营，荣格巴什拉弗莱都被划到了结构主义的对立面。终章提到巴塔耶 Le bleu du ciel：Todorov认为Gautier当年不敢写（只敢遮遮掩掩的靠吸血鬼绕弯表达）的恋尸癖情节今天巴大爷敢明目张胆的写出来是因为psychoanalysis的诞生。换言之，今天的psychoanalysis已经取代了当年Fantastique的社会功能。末章讨论《变形记》极好。分析fantastique-uncanny与侦探小说的相似性，以及关于最小叙事二次平衡的提法，乃《散文诗学》本色出演。结尾是非常有布朗肖色彩的一笔。(展开)
记得博尔赫斯在前言里老会说这么一句话，本篇除了这个这个这个，其他的都是幻想故事tales of the fantastic，但按todorov的分法，JLB写的显然大多是the marvelous，总感觉分得太细了，Chanady区分过the fantastic和魔幻现实，但难道真正容易混淆的不应该是the marvelous和魔幻现实么
renardyy
四川大学出版社2015版
问道木南
四川大学出版社2015版
万戈
四川大学出版社2015版
0 有用 花岗岩下的花生 2014-07-13 23:18:36
虽然是theory.但明显比他的老师Roland Barth好读多了。读的好爽。Fantastic但就是比较模棱两可的主题，能如此细致透彻的分析。真真是好厉害的
0 有用 fish 2014-12-03 08:33:21
期末写论文时看的参考书。这本书解了我不少长期以来的困惑，有点明白自己为什么在这么多题材中对fantastic stories情有独钟了。
0 有用 若口引陆 2022-07-18 21:39:56
真的是一本很经典、精彩的形式主义论著。
2 有用 野次馬 2015-09-12 15:41:45
逻辑结构特别清楚，一上来就划分了阵营，荣格巴什拉弗莱都被划到了结构主义的对立面。终章提到巴塔耶 Le bleu du ciel：Todorov认为Gautier当年不敢写（只敢遮遮掩掩的靠吸血鬼绕弯表达）的恋尸癖情节今天巴大爷敢明目张胆的写出来是因为psychoanalysis的诞生。换言之，今天的psychoanalysis已经取代了当年Fantastique的社会功能。末章讨论《变形记》极好。... 逻辑结构特别清楚，一上来就划分了阵营，荣格巴什拉弗莱都被划到了结构主义的对立面。终章提到巴塔耶 Le bleu du ciel：Todorov认为Gautier当年不敢写（只敢遮遮掩掩的靠吸血鬼绕弯表达）的恋尸癖情节今天巴大爷敢明目张胆的写出来是因为psychoanalysis的诞生。换言之，今天的psychoanalysis已经取代了当年Fantastique的社会功能。末章讨论《变形记》极好。分析fantastique-uncanny与侦探小说的相似性，以及关于最小叙事二次平衡的提法，乃《散文诗学》本色出演。结尾是非常有布朗肖色彩的一笔。 (展开)
0 有用 octopusion 2019-03-19 04:44:23
这本书是我从电影类型追溯到文学类型的奇妙旅行。
0 有用 若口引陆 2022-07-18 21:39:56
真的是一本很经典、精彩的形式主义论著。
0 有用 Neptune. 2021-04-14 20:37:08
每年讀它每年忘掉然後每年再讀它
0 有用 Henry Porter 2020-07-16 09:26:43
记得博尔赫斯在前言里老会说这么一句话，本篇除了这个这个这个，其他的都是幻想故事tales of the fantastic，但按todorov的分法，JLB写的显然大多是the marvelous，总感觉分得太细了，Chanady区分过the fantastic和魔幻现实，但难道真正容易混淆的不应该是the marvelous和魔幻现实么
0 有用 octopusion 2019-03-19 04:44:23
这本书是我从电影类型追溯到文学类型的奇妙旅行。
0 有用 Lily Tian 2018-12-16 19:08:59
虽说literary genre的划分源于主观，但是genre的划分对于更好研究文学作品仍十分有必要。只是要懂得变通，不要在文学研究时被genre捆住手脚。一切都是为了更好理解与欣赏文学作品而服务！