By bringing queer theory to bear on ideas of diaspora, Gayatri Gopinath produces both a more compelling queer theory and a more nuanced understanding of diaspora. Focusing on queer female diasporic subjectivity, Gopinath develops a theory of diaspora apart from the logic of blood, authenticity, and patrilineal descent that she argues invariably forms the core of conventional formulations. She examines a range of South Asian diasporic literature, film, and music in order to suggest alternative ways of conceptualizing community and collectivity across disparate geographic locations. Her deft readings challenge nationalist ideologies by bringing to light that which has been rendered illegible or impossible within diaspora: the impure, inauthentic, and non-reproductive.
Gopinath juxtaposes diverse texts to indicate the range of oppositional practices, subjectivities, and visions of collectivity that fall outside not only mainstream narratives of diaspora, colonialism, and nationalism but also most projects of liberal feminism and gay and lesbian politics and theory. She considers British Asian music of the 1990s alongside alternative media and cultural practices. Among the fictional works she discusses are V. S. Naipaul’s classic novel A House for Mr. Biswas, Ismat Chugtai’s short story “The Quilt,” Monica Ali’s Brick Lane, Shyam Selvadurai’s Funny Boy, and Shani Mootoo’s Cereus Blooms at Night. Analyzing films including Deepa Mehta’s controversial Fire and Mira Nair’s Monsoon Wedding, she pays particular attention to how South Asian diasporic feminist filmmakers have reworked Bollywood’s strategies of queer representation and to what is lost or gained in this process of translation. Gopinath’s readings are dazzling, and her theoretical framework transformative and far-reaching.
3 有用 吃点麦片 2022-05-08 13:46:18
通过’home’的概念(homeland / domestic home),将queer之于heterosexuality的关系和diaspora之于nation的关系并列,论证female diasporic subjectivity比gay male/son更queer,连接queer and feminist stances.
1 有用 ᨳ͛☆ഒ 2025-05-26 15:35:15 陕西
半文盲觉得有些部分真的比较难读,早早去看了《我美丽的洗衣店》和《爱火》。主要在讲南亚侨民文化中被主流叙事消音的酷儿欲望与身份政治,以文学、电影、音乐等文化文本为切入点,揭示全球化与民族主义话语下酷儿主体如何通过公共文化实践重构“家”与“归属”的意义。民族主义话语压抑(不管是传统还是后期殖民政府带来的偏向性法律,还是现在印度政府在清洁印度计划暗含德女性规训)这一部分我想到了去年看的《生命与言辞》,不... 半文盲觉得有些部分真的比较难读,早早去看了《我美丽的洗衣店》和《爱火》。主要在讲南亚侨民文化中被主流叙事消音的酷儿欲望与身份政治,以文学、电影、音乐等文化文本为切入点,揭示全球化与民族主义话语下酷儿主体如何通过公共文化实践重构“家”与“归属”的意义。民族主义话语压抑(不管是传统还是后期殖民政府带来的偏向性法律,还是现在印度政府在清洁印度计划暗含德女性规训)这一部分我想到了去年看的《生命与言辞》,不过那个是在创伤背景之下的。 (展开)
1 有用 Micco_D 2025-04-28 01:53:35 美国
开创性研究,思路清晰;看了intro和East Is East相关部分,感觉具体分析写得比intro深刻,intro看似论证了许多合理性批判性重要性,但有些联系不是很必然,比如global capitalism的部分。所选文本能否真的达到queering批判的效果也值得商榷,Mina的queerness感觉很勉强,我也不太能接受把queerness和difference/alternative几乎... 开创性研究,思路清晰;看了intro和East Is East相关部分,感觉具体分析写得比intro深刻,intro看似论证了许多合理性批判性重要性,但有些联系不是很必然,比如global capitalism的部分。所选文本能否真的达到queering批判的效果也值得商榷,Mina的queerness感觉很勉强,我也不太能接受把queerness和difference/alternative几乎等同。。 (展开)