作者:
Johannes Fabian 出版社: Columbia University Press 副标题: How Anthropology Makes Its Object 出版年: 2002-4-15 页数: 205 定价: USD 33.00 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780231125772
Fabian's study is a classic in the field that changed the way anthropologists relate to their subjects and is of immense value not only to anthropologists but to all those concerned with the study of man. A new foreward by Matti Bunzl brings the influence of Fabian's study up to the present. Time and the Other is a critique of the notions that anthropologists are "here and now,...
Fabian's study is a classic in the field that changed the way anthropologists relate to their subjects and is of immense value not only to anthropologists but to all those concerned with the study of man. A new foreward by Matti Bunzl brings the influence of Fabian's study up to the present. Time and the Other is a critique of the notions that anthropologists are "here and now," their objects of study are "there and then," and that the "other" exists in a time not contemporary with our own.
Fabian's argument is motivated by a contradiction inherent to the anthropological discipline: on the one hand, anthropological knowledge is produced in the course of fieldwork through the intersubjective communication between anthropologists and interlocutors; on the other hand, traditional forms of ethnographic representation require the constitutive suppression of the dialogical realities generating anthropological insights in the first place. In the objectifying discourses of a scientistic anthropology, "Others" thus never appear as immediate partners in a cultural exchange but as spatially and, more importantly, temporally distanced groups. (查看原文)
联想到Edward Said "The Orientalism"，好像Fabian给书中描述的现象做出了解释，其成因便是他的主要论点the differentiation of time，再一个就是他俩都对被研究对象自我描述/陈述的能力对这种文化之间双向或单方向的交流有所讨论。再缩小范围想到一个社会内同样的这种"we" con...
(展开)
哲夫成城
北京师范大学出版社2018版
springjournal
1 有用 cicada 2015-02-26 13:46:13
费边开篇就说时间、金钱和语言是交换价值的三种实在体现：后两种是当然，关于“时间”的说法值得继续推敲。对我个人来说，费边的讨论最有意义的部分是他对于传播模型的质疑，即是否存在所谓的“发出者（生产者）”与“接受者（消费者）”之间的时空差距。在我自己的讨论中，跟着费边的思路，可以认为“现代性”和“文学价值”这些概念并不是从西欧传播开来的，而是在全球性的地方互动中生发出来的概念综合，不同的地方性价值在互动... 费边开篇就说时间、金钱和语言是交换价值的三种实在体现：后两种是当然，关于“时间”的说法值得继续推敲。对我个人来说，费边的讨论最有意义的部分是他对于传播模型的质疑，即是否存在所谓的“发出者（生产者）”与“接受者（消费者）”之间的时空差距。在我自己的讨论中，跟着费边的思路，可以认为“现代性”和“文学价值”这些概念并不是从西欧传播开来的，而是在全球性的地方互动中生发出来的概念综合，不同的地方性价值在互动中中找到可以交换的表述方式。 (展开)
1 有用 日照充足 2022-02-11 14:23:06
Coevality 不同于simultaneity- 后者对时间的同质化，前者则是与他者时间遭遇的基本条件所在。
0 有用 绫懒遥 2019-02-08 10:55:36
201512-201902，一刷chapter1&2&5成功。202006chapter3&4补刷。
0 有用 鸿音 2021-03-05 21:44:47
一本关于（人类学西方理论话语）异时性（的霸权与对人类学研究对象的书写）的反思。对这种范式的突破则在于重视物质文化、实践论与对“时间”的再解读。
0 有用 鄭巨源 2023-09-23 16:13:22 浙江
虽然具体论述和章节安排略显杂乱，但全书呈现的理念和方法论极为精妙，值得重读。