Few other economists have been read and cited as much as R.H. Coase, a scholar who approached economics as a philosopher: with contemplation, careful scrutiny of real conditions and consideration of the practical implications of theory. "These essays bear rereading. Coase's careful attention to actual institutions not only offers deep insight into economics but also provides th...
Few other economists have been read and cited as much as R.H. Coase, a scholar who approached economics as a philosopher: with contemplation, careful scrutiny of real conditions and consideration of the practical implications of theory. "These essays bear rereading. Coase's careful attention to actual institutions not only offers deep insight into economics but also provides the best argument for Coase's methodological position. The clarity of the exposition and the elegance of the style also make them a pleasure to read and a model worthy of emulation."--Lewis A. Kornhauser, Journal of Economic Literature
科思的两篇经典论文是非常可读,而且能轻易在网上找到...这本书里只有两篇论文是科思专门写的。至于那两篇论文值不值得购买这本书呢,那就看情况吧。我给四星也是这个原因;科思的"The Problem of Social Cost"够五星。另"Social Cost"里最精彩部分是科思批评庇古理论(及庇古税)的部分,请读下去吧(约六十页);只有前二十页是讲述著名的“科思定理”(斯蒂格勒语)。
这本薄薄的册子收录了科斯除 The Federal Communications Commission(1959)外几乎所有重要论文,是窥探科斯经济学思想的重要媒介。其中《企业的性质》一篇已经多次读过,对于《边际成本论争》一文也有粗略了解。此次回过头来细细精度,尤其重视查阅注释中的文献资料,对新制...
(展开)
0 有用 coldrush 2010-02-07 19:08:19
帅老头的精华尽在于此
1 有用 SuSo 2013-12-24 17:08:57
科思的两篇经典论文是非常可读,而且能轻易在网上找到...这本书里只有两篇论文是科思专门写的。至于那两篇论文值不值得购买这本书呢,那就看情况吧。我给四星也是这个原因;科思的"The Problem of Social Cost"够五星。另"Social Cost"里最精彩部分是科思批评庇古理论(及庇古税)的部分,请读下去吧(约六十页);只有前二十页是讲述著名的“科思定理”(斯蒂格勒语)。
0 有用 心海的水母 2019-05-10 09:46:01
祖师爷
0 有用 止疼片 2016-12-05 19:22:06
字字珠玑,老爷子的精华应该都在这本小册子里面了
0 有用 廖芜 2021-02-10 11:03:50
泛泛读过了重要的几篇