Weber warned that in a misguided attempt to exorcise the demons of Weimar, the creators of the Federal Republic's constitution had simply defined away the state of exception and the need for a strong executive. He claimed that for sure, the enormous vital power of the political, which had not been avoided during Weimar, seems to have been outwitted in the Basic Law. But it will nevertheless break into Germany from inside and outside. The existential, uncontrollable quality of the political could only be kept in check by a strong executive. Yet, that quality was not only to be feared - it was also to be cherished and celebrated. From such a perspective, liberal constitutions would always be too weak and too strong simultaneously: too weak to contain the political and yet too strong to let t... (查看原文)
扬-维尔纳·米勒 作者
汪杨
道德经
0 有用 迅疾 2014-05-23 00:10:37
当代德国部分不是很熟悉，跳着读完紧要的部分。其实我还是搞不明白“价值的僭政”是啥意思……智商不够用了……
1 有用 Archie 2014-03-13 17:50:33
#論國家與政治的正當性#一個後英雄時代能否在沒有敵對關係甚或缺乏某種同質性形式的條件下創造出新的超民族的同一性?是否超越主權的政治邏輯是可以想像的?他所建議的國家模式本質上是靜止的,實體性的以及威權主義的. 最終,面對他自己所察覺到的合法性戰勝正當性,功能戰勝實體的凱旋,他只有繳械投降.
0 有用 不懒奇特 2015-05-09 18:59:33
权力游戏
0 有用 行动视讯头 2012-11-25 13:06:28
翻译稍蛋疼，不过还能看过去。也是随便看看了解一下，不能算深究。
2 有用 九月 2011-09-21 14:17:37
可能是目前国内最全面的二手schmitt。无奈国际公法、政治神学、游击理论等方面的基础知识不够，很大部分被吃掉了，求盾哥解救……另外，翻译能不能不要用“列维·施特劳斯（Leo Strauss）”这种玩意来秀下限啊！！！