Introductory book to natural theology and atheology.
Some arguments are quite obfuscating. Not really convinced by the Free Will Defence on the problem of evil. I still subscribe to Mackie's argument that it is logically possible for individuals to act freely but always go right.
2 有用 路德喵 2011-12-11 20:53:21
以自由意志來解釋為甚麼神可容許苦難存在，這書自七十年代扭轉了宗教哲學界對苦難問題的整個討論方向。但仍算是簡短可讀。
0 有用 Li 2010-10-05 02:14:42
主要关注Plantinga自己的OA
0 有用 a dime 2024-07-05 20:53:26 天津
老师说是通俗读物，但也非常考验耐心，似乎把作者著作简写在一本书里了。作为一个门外汉，我还是觉得他引用的神学争论本身更有趣。前半部分指出莱布尼茨神正论的缺陷——“最好的世界”不存在，指出无神论的前提错误，transworld depravity与自由意志的关系还挺有意思的，与奥古斯丁，加尔文total depravity概念有关。后半部分清晰地从宇宙论（阿奎纳的错误）、目的论（休谟有力的反驳）和本体论（安瑟尔谟及其反对者，康德认为存在不是实在的谓词）角度举出著名神学论述进行反复验证。
1 有用 人类人类 2015-10-14 00:28:56
精彩的论证！
1 有用 Maltesers 2016-10-11 04:43:19
Introductory book to natural theology and atheology. Some arguments are quite obfuscating. Not really convinced by the Free Will Defence on the problem of evil. I still subscribe to Mackie's argument that it is logically possible for individuals to act freely but always go right.